A Methodology of Teaching Fundamentals of Art and Design
Keywords:
Fine Art research and approach, foundations in art & design, art composition analysis and development, teaching methodology, theory, teaching groundwork & practiceAbstract
The focus of this paper is to present a methodology of teaching fundamentals of Art & Design course base on analysis of artworks, mainly paintings, aimed at supporting art & design teaching practice at the foundation year level. The main argument is that this kind of analytical research and its application has not (always) been comprehensive and may not have been guided by sufficient assessment of teaching of the fundamentals of
composition.
The cases here are derived from my teaching practice and research in design studios of the Foundation Studies courses at the School of Architecture and Design and are supported by the students’ outcomes in these related studio courses.
The conceptual background of the program puts forward that design develops its theory from practice through the iterative creative process of “thinking through making†as it was demonstrated by the teachers in the foundation courses at the Bauhaus. (Lecanides-Arnott, 2014; Ranjan, 2005).
As a teaching methodology in question, this paper argues in favor of a direct teaching approach to core ideas relating to composition at the foundation year level of Art and Design. This may question educational methodologies concerned with the teaching of the fundamentals of art & design in general, where students are to discover compositional core ideas, processes and application within rather intuitive and indirect learning processes. Although in other teaching methodologies, the elements of composition may be referred to and may be demonstrated in lectures, analysis, projects, processes and critiques, little evidence remains to show how students are consciously aware of their significance and use.
The methodology presented in this paper urges for a more direct process of discovery and assimilation of the core ideas related to composition by the students: as firsthand research and development on their behalf. This research maintains that when core ideas are presented, synthesized and applied at an early stage in art & design teaching, students forge a deeper understanding of composition that empowers their visual thinking processes, analysis capacities, synthesis, self-critique and application.
This research considers the transmission of core ideas related to composition as a fundamental objective in art and design learning and practice. It looks at ways of expanding the findings acquired through the analysis of artworks to notable applications in art & design, where core ideas become the basis for explorations of more complex or rather different compositional structures in diverse media.
The paper also argues that most “significant†artworks are based, whether it be intuitive (visual) or intentional (rational / mathematical), on a relative and proportional relation among the “parts†that constitute the “wholeâ€. When examined, the compositions demonstrate an inherent structural complexity comparable with a mathematical relativity among their visual constituents.
Core ideas are presented within an itemized framework of an analysis process. A case is made that the breakdown of an artwork to its essential components will help to produce essential compositional outcomes [regarded as "schemas" or blueprints] that can be used in further design applications and developments.
Then it looks at methods on how to reinvest the outcomes of the analysis in projects that would carry further the understanding and the applications of the acquired concepts, thinking processes and approaches.
Based on the notion of de-construction / re-construction, a case is made of certain possibilities of the use of the outcomes of the analysis as systems to produce novel art & design exercises and projects [new outcomes].
Such a methodology can be developed into a well-grounded and rich set of open art & design teaching approach appropriate to the needs of instructing students at introductory undergraduate levels in art, design and those in preparation for architecture schools; particularly in countries where undergraduate students have had little creative training or insufficient art education at secondary and high schools.
Â
Â
References
• Lecanides-Arnott M. (2014). Drawing as “learning to seeâ€: A strategy to locate the “white/open spaceâ€
that encourages intuitive thinking in designers. Studies in Material Thinking, Vol. 10 (February 2014),
the Art of Research, www.materialthinking.org
•
Ranjan, M. P. (2005). Lessons from Bauhaus, Ulm and NID: Role of basic design in post-graduate education. Proceedings of Design Education: Tradition and Modernity International Conference, DETM 05, Ahmedabad, National Institute of Design, 2 – 4, March 2005
• Dewey, J. (2010). Democracy and Education: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education. Indo-European Publishing. Retrieved 20 May 2013
• Stolterman, E. (2008). The Nature of Design Practice and Implications for Interaction Design Research. International Journal of Design, Vol. 2(1) April 2008
• D’Andrea Cennini, Cennino (1954). The Craftsman’s Handbook, trans. Daniel V. Thompson, Jr. (New York: Dover Publications, 1954), p.7
• Dewey, J. (2010).The educational balance, efficiency and thinking (EET). In Simpson, D.J., & Stack, S.F. (Eds), Teachers, leaders and schools: Essays by John Dewey (41-45). Carbonale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press
• Nelson, G. H. and Stolterman, E. (2003). The Design Way. Intentional change in an unpredictable world. Foundations and Fundamentals of Design Competence. Englewood Cliffs, Educational Technology Publications
• Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books
• Wilson, S. (1969). Early educational reformers and contemporary architectural education. Architectural Science Review, 12(4), 99-104
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
- Papers must be submitted on the understanding that they have not been published elsewhere (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, or thesis) and are not currently under consideration by another journal published by any other publisher.
- It is also the authors responsibility to ensure that the articles emanating from a particular source are submitted with the necessary approval.
- The authors warrant that the paper is original and that he/she is the author of the paper, except for material that is clearly identified as to its original source, with permission notices from the copyright owners where required.
- The authors ensure that all the references carefully and they are accurate in the text as well as in the list of references (and vice versa).
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
- The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.
