Do Post-Reading-Questions in EFL / ESL Reading Textbooks Improve Cognitive Skills?
Keywords:
cognitive processes, Bloom’s revised taxonomy, lower- / higher-order thinking skills, post-reading questionsAbstract
In the present study we investigate the characteristics of post-reading questions in EFL / ESL reading textbooks for lower English proficiency students. Two types of textbooks were compared using Bloom’s Revised taxonomy. One type aims at improving not only learners’ English skills but also enhancing their critical thinking skills whereas the other type intend to improve learners’ reading skills as well as their English skills. The focus of this investigation is on whether there are any differences in the cognitive skills that learners are expected to employ while using these textbooks and if so how they differ. The results illustrate that the two types of textbooks actually show different patterns of usage in the cognitive process. While the cognitive skills enhancing textbooks use a variety of cognitive processes (12 of 19 subcategories), the reading skills textbooks use only 7 of them. As reading skills textbooks are widely used at university in Japan, teachers who would like to develop a wider variety of cognitive skills have to prepare additional / other questions when the questions in textbooks seem insufficient for the purpose. One of the teaching implications from this study is the use of the first language and short answer questions.References
OECD. “21st Century Skills and Competences for New Millennium Learners in OECD Countries, EDU Working paper†no. 41. 2009. Retrieved fromhttp://www.oecd.org/officialdocu ments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=EDU/W -KP(2009)20-&doclanguage=en，
Takeo Tanaka. “Yoi hatsumon, warui hatsumon: jyugyo wo kaeru hatsumonn towa†[Good questions and bad questions: what are the questions to change classrooms]. Eigo Kyoiku, 59 (1), 10-13. 2010.
Takeo Tanaka & Chisato Tanaka, “Eigo Kyoshi no tameno Hatsumon Technique†[Designing of English classrooms: Reading Comprehenshion, Focusiong on the quesiotns] Tokyo: Taishukan shoten. 2009.
Seiji Fukazawa, “Dokkai wo sokushin-suru hatsumon zukuri no jyuyosei – Koto gakko eigo reading kyokashochu no setsumon-bunseki wo toshite†[Significance of Designing Questions to Enhance Reading Comprehension: Through the analysis of post-reading questions in senior high school English textbooks in Japan]. Bulletin of the Graduate School of Education, Hiroshima University. Part. II. 57, 169-176. 2008.
Seiko Hirai (Ed.), “A Study of language education based on the theories of bilingualism: the effectiveness of CALP-oriented teaching methodologies†Report on study 23520699 Grants-in Aid for Scientific Research C. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science(JSPS), 2014.
Lorin W. Anderson and David R. Krathwohl (Eds.), “A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of educational objectives, abridged edition†New York: Longman. 2001.
Benjamin S. Bloom, Max D. Engelhart, Edward J. Furst, Walker H. Hill, & David R. Krathwohl “Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain†New York: David McKay Company. 1956.
Takeo Tanaka, Katsumasa Shimada & Hiroyuki Kondo, “Suiron hatsumon wo tori ireta eigo reading shidoâ€[English Reading Guidance for Incorporating Inferential Questions] Sanseido Co Ltd., 74-87, 2015
Yoshio Katayama, Eiichi Endo, Akira Sasaki & Mikio Matsumura, “Shin eigo ka kyouiku no kenkyu†[New Study on English Education]. Taishukan Publishing Co., Ltd, 1994.
Tom Hutchinson, Alan Waters, English for Specific Purposes, Cambridge University Press, 1987
Carl B, Smith, Dorra M. Ellis and Eugene Read, “The Importance of Expository Text: Reading and Writingâ€. Retrieved form https://files.eFric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED480886.pdf (Viewed on 17th of February, 2018)
Ronald B. Gillam, Elizabeth D. Pena & Lynda Miler, “Dynamic Assessment of Narrative and Expository Discourseâ€, Bulletin of the Topics in Language Discourse; Research Library 33-47, Nov.,1999.
Anne P. Sweet and Catherine E. Snow (Eds.), Rethinking reading comprehension. New York: Guilford. 2003
IT Training Services, Penn State University 2017, Writing Effective Quiz Questions. Retrieved from http://personal.psu.edu/bxb11/QuizQuestions/QuizQuestions_print.html (Viewed on 17th of February, 2018)
Tsuneo Takahashi & Masao Takahashi, “Eigo reading shido no kiso†[Basics of Teaching English Reading]. Tokyo: Kenkyusha. 1987
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
- Papers must be submitted on the understanding that they have not been published elsewhere (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, or thesis) and are not currently under consideration by another journal published by any other publisher.
- It is also the authors responsibility to ensure that the articles emanating from a particular source are submitted with the necessary approval.
- The authors warrant that the paper is original and that he/she is the author of the paper, except for material that is clearly identified as to its original source, with permission notices from the copyright owners where required.
- The authors ensure that all the references carefully and they are accurate in the text as well as in the list of references (and vice versa).
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
- The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.
