Literature and the Endangered World: A Comparative Study of Selected Works of Eastern and Western Poets


  • Saroja Dhanapal Taylor's University
  • Kalai Vaani Rajandram


Ecocriticism, stylistics, DAIDO ecocriticism analysis


Ecocriticism is a new field of enquiry and being so there is yet to be a consensus as to its definition. Glotfelty (1996) defines ecocriticism as “the study of the relationship between literature and the physical environment.â€Â  As we are aware, debates on the environmental problems faced by mankind is raging on around the world. According to Hong (2008) ecocriticism is a newly-emerging literary theory standing out in the late 20th century. Siddiqui (2012) defines ecocriticism as an interdisciplinary mode of thinking which studies environmental issue and literature. Kerridge (1998) claims ecocriticism seeks to evaluate text and ideas in terms of their coherence and usefulness as responses to environmental crisis. Buell (2001) claims that there are several defining motifs or topoi in toxic discourse; shock of awakened perception, disenchantment from the illusion of a green oasis accompanied or precipitated by totalising images of a world without refuge from toxic penetration and linking environmental reform with social justice against  a common enemy of corporate greed. However, he goes on to add that, there is a gamut of possible reactions including outrage, acquiescence, impotence, denial and desperation (Buell, 2001, 36). In this paper, the researchers analysed the link between literature and environment with focus on one genre which is poetry. In addition to analysing the link, the researchers will also do a comparative analysis of selected works of Western and Asian poets. The purpose is to identify the similarities and differences in the approaches adopted by these poets using Buell’s identification of motif’s and reactions towards the destruction of nature at the expense of development. Buell’s identification of the various reactions towards the dying environment was adapted to form the framework identified as the DAIDO ecocriticism analysis which was used to analyse the poets’ perceptions, language and treatment of the subject matter through the stylistic analysis.


Ariffin, Mohammad Sidik. “All The Trees Are Falling Down: Environmental Concern Of A Malaysian Poetâ€. Second International Seminar, Institut Peradaban Melayu Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, 2 September 2008.Web. 14 February 2013.

Bennett, Michael. 2001. “Anti- Pastoralism, Frederick Douglass and the Nature of Slaveryâ€. In Beyond Nature Writing: Expanding the Bondaries of Ecocritisism, edited by Karla Armbruster and Kathleen R. Wallace, 195-229. Charlottesville and London: University Press of Virginia.

Buell, L. 2001. Writing for an Endangered World: Literature, Culture, and Environment in the US and Beyond. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Buell, L. 2005. The Future of Environmental Criticism: Environmental Crisis and Literary Imagination, Australia: Blackwell Publishing.

Carter, R.A. and Long M.N. 1991. Teaching Literature. New York: Longman.

Cokinos, Christopher. “What is Ecocritism?â€. The Association for the study of literature and the Environment (ASLE). Kansas: Kansas State University. n.pag.Web. 1 February 2013.

Dissanayake, Wimal. “Encounters.†Sunday Observer. Sunday Observer, 16 December 2012. Web. 14 February 2013.

Howarth, William. 1996. “Some Principles of Ecocriticismâ€. In The Ecocriticism Reader: Landmarks in Literary Ecology, edited by Glotfelty, Cheryll and Harold Fromm, 69-91. Athens, Georgia: University of Georgia Press.

Mazel, David. 2000. American Literary Environmentalism. Athens: University of Georgia Publishing.

Meeker, Joseph. 1997. The Comedy of Survival: Literary Ecology and Play Ethic. 3rd Ed. Tuscon: University of Arizona.

Oppermann, S. 2011. “The Future of Ecocriticismâ€. In New Horizons, edited by Serpil Oppermann, Ufuk Ozdag, Nevin Ozkan, and Scott Slovic, 14-29. Cambridge: Scholars Publishing.

Tosic, Jelica. 2006. “Ecocriticism, Interdisciplinary Study and Environmentâ€. FACTA Universitatis. Series: Working and Living environment Protection 3(1): 43-50.

Wallace, Kathleen R., and Karla Armbruster. 2001. “Introduction: Why go Beyond Nature Writing and Where to?.†In Beyond Nature Writing: Expanding the Boundaries of Ecocriticism, edited by Karla Armbruster and Kathleen R. Wallace, 1-25. Charlottesville and London: University Press of Virginia.

Widdowson, H.G. 1975.Stylistics and the teaching of literature. London: Longman Group Ltd..




How to Cite

Dhanapal, S., & Rajandram, K. V. (2014). Literature and the Endangered World: A Comparative Study of Selected Works of Eastern and Western Poets. Asian Journal of Education and E-Learning, 2(3). Retrieved from