A Critical Analysis of Errors Made by Rural and Urban Students in ‘O’ Level Mathematics Paper 1 (4008/1) in Shurugwi and Gweru Districts, Zimbabwe
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24203/ajeel.v5i2.4652Keywords:
mathematical error, “O†Level students, rural students, urban students, types of errors, error analysis, error rectificationAbstract
This study critically investigated and analysed mathematical errors made by forty rural and urban Zimbabwe Ordinary Level students who wrote a test adopted from the ZIMSEC 2012 past examination paper (4008/1). Twenty students at a rural school in Shurugwi District and twenty students of similar characteristics (except for location or district) at an urban school in Gweru District were randomly sampled. Questions 1 and 7 (arithmetic and algebraic manipulations), 2 and 21 (psychomotor skills- measurement, shading, locus and geometric constructions) and 8 and 15 (word problems) were purposively sampled and students’ written and marked scripts were subjected to a critical analysis of errors. The errors were classified into eight categories proposed by Dufresne (2012) and these were error in knowledge, error in skill, error in concept, error in making connections, error in strategy effectiveness, error in convention, error in process and error in format. Mixed methods (QUAL-quan, content and interpretivist) analyses of errors made by the rural students and those made by the urban students were made. The study offers possible strategies that teachers in rural and urban areas can use to rectify students’ mathematical errors in the classroom situation and contributes to the body of knowledge on mathematical error analysis.   Â
References
• Ball, D. L., Thames, M., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education 59(5), pp. 389-407. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554
• Bingolbali, E., Akkoç, H., Ozmantar, M.F. & Demir, S. (2011). Pre-Service and In-Service Teachers‟ Views of the Sources of Students‟ Mathematical Difficulties. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education – IΣJMΣ 6, (1), pp. 40-59.
• Chirume, S. (2012). Reducing Mathematics Anxiety and Building Positive Attitudes: A Challenge For Teachers and Students. The Dyke, 6(1), pp.15-33.
• Chirume, S. & Chikasha, A.S. (2014). A Critical Analysis of the Factors Affecting Achievement in Secondary School Mathematics in Zimbabwe: A Case Study of Gweru District. Merit Research Journal of Education and Review, 2(9), pp. 194-202.
• Cohen, L.G. & Spenciner, L.J. (2007). Assessment of Children and Youth with Special Needs. Merrill, pp. 262-263.
• Dufresne, R. (2012). Math 151 Error Analysis. Retrieved on 29/10/15 from http://people.qatar.tamu.edu/raelene.dufresne/education/math150/Math_150/Resources_files/erroranalysis.pdf
• Elbrink, M. (2008). Analyzing and Addressing Common Mathematical Errors in Secondary Education. [Extended Thesis Abstracts]. B.S. Undergraduate Mathematics Exchange, 5(1), pp. 1-4
• Ernest, P. (2004). The Philosophy of Mathematics Education. Routledge Falmer, Taylor and Francis e-Library, ISBN 0-203-49701-5 [Master e-book]
• Error Pattern Analysis, (n.d). Retrieved on from http://specialconnections.ku.edu/~specconn/page/instruction/math/pdf/patternanalysis.pdf
• Gardee, A., & Brodie, K. (2015). A teacher’s engagement with learner errors in her Grade 9 mathematics classroom. Pythagoras, 36(2), pp. 1-9. Retrieved on 8/04/16 from http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/pythagoras.v36i2.293
• Hirashima, T., & Horiguchi, T. (2016). Creation of Cognitive Conflict by Error-Visualization: Error-Based Simulation and Its Practical Use in Science Learning. Springer International Publishing Switzerland, J.M. Spector et al. (eds.), Learning, Design, and Technology, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-17727-4_9-1
• Kessel, C. (ed.) (2009). Teaching Teachers Mathematics: Research, Ideas, Projects, Evaluation. Mathematical Sciences Research Institute, Berkeley, California
• Koehler , M.J., Mishra, P., Kereluik, K., Shin, T.S., & Graham, C.R. (2014). The Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Framework. In J.M. Spector, J.M. et al. (eds.), Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, Springer Science+Business Media New York, 101 DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_9.
• Lester Jr, F.K. (2005). On the theoretical, conceptual, and philosophical foundations for research in mathematics education. ZDM 37(6), pp. 457-467.
• Livingston, K.D. (2015). Correcting errors in the L2 classroom: students' and teachers' perceptions. Revista Electrónica del Lenguaje, (2), pp. 1-36.
• Lourens, R., Molefe, N. & Brodie, K. (2011). Workshop: Error Analysis of Mathematics Test Items. Retrieved on 29/10/15 from http://directorymathsed.net/download/Lourens.pdf
• Luneta, K. (2015). Understanding students’ misconceptions: An analysis of final Grade 12 examination questions in geometry. Pythagoras, 36(1), Art. #261, 11 pages. Retrieved on 21/6/16 from http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/pythagoras.v36i1.261
• Nyikahadzoyi, M.R. (2013). Teachers’ knowledge of the concept of a function: A theoretical framework. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 13 (Suppl 2): pp. 261-283.
• Ross, A. & Onwuegbuzie, A.J. (2012). Prevalence of Mixed Methods Research in Mathematics Education. The Mathematics Educator, 22(1), pp. 84–113.
• Shalem, Y., Sapire, I., & Sorto, M.A. (2014). Teachers’ explanations of learners’ errors in standardised mathematics assessments. Pythagoras, 35(1), pp. 1-11.
• Zemelman, S., Daniels, H., & Hyde, A. (2005). Best practice: New standards for teaching and learning in America’s school (3rd Edition). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
• ZIMSEC (2012a). Zimbabwe General Certificate of Education (ZGCE) ‘O’ Level Syllabus Mathematics 4008/4028. Retrieved on 21/04/15 from http://www.zimsec.co.zw/O_SYLLABUS/O-MATHEMATICS.pdf.
• ZIMSEC (2012b). Zimbabwe School Examinations Council: General Certificate of Education Ordinary Level Mathematics 4008/1 Paper 1 [Questions 1, 2, 7, 8, 15, and 21] ZIMSEC, Harare.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
- Papers must be submitted on the understanding that they have not been published elsewhere (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, or thesis) and are not currently under consideration by another journal published by any other publisher.
- It is also the authors responsibility to ensure that the articles emanating from a particular source are submitted with the necessary approval.
- The authors warrant that the paper is original and that he/she is the author of the paper, except for material that is clearly identified as to its original source, with permission notices from the copyright owners where required.
- The authors ensure that all the references carefully and they are accurate in the text as well as in the list of references (and vice versa).
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
- The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.
