Who’s Steering: Technology or Pedagogy? Analyzing an Arabic Immersion Experience

Authors

  • Ali Hechemi Raddaoui Alef Education - Abu Dhabi Financial Group, Abu Dhabi, UAE

Keywords:

Immersion, Web 2.0, Technology, Pedagogy

Abstract

With reflective practice as framework, this paper ponders whether the ICT tools used during an Arabic language immersion course run by the National US StarTalk program at the University of Wyoming are subservient to pedagogy or whether pedagogy has primacy over these tools. In Part One, I introduce the context for this immersion initiative. In Part Two, I examine two paradoxes: (i) the disjuncture between teaching and pedagogy, and (ii) the conflicting representations of the net-gen. In Part Three, I analyze the Arabic StarTalk curriculum to determine whether its objectives were served or enslaved by the available technologies. I conclude with a call for rethinking this binary technology/pedagogy theorization toward a position suggesting instead a rapport of interdependence, convergence and symbiosis.

Author Biography

  • Ali Hechemi Raddaoui, Alef Education - Abu Dhabi Financial Group, Abu Dhabi, UAE

    Ali Hechemi Raddaoui, Fulbright Scholar, 1984-1988; Ph.D. in Applied Linguistics from Indiana University in Bloomington. Currently, Ali is working as an Associate Professor of Applied Linguistics at Dhofar University's College of Arts and Applied Sciences. His teaching experience spans Tunisia, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Britain, the USA, and Oman. Ali’s research interests include learning and teaching best practice, e-learning in formal contexts and beyond, language and education policies in the Arab world, translation and creative writing. Email: araddaoui@gmail.com

References

ACTFL (American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages). “Standards for Foreign Language Learning: Preparing for the 21st Centuryâ€, 2006. Retrieved July 7, 2011, from http://www.actfl.org/files/public/StandardsforFLLexecsumm_rev.pdf

Bigum, C. “Teachers And Computers: n Control or Being Controlled?â€, Australian Journal Of Education, Vol. 41, No. 4, pp. 247-261, 1997.

Bigum, C. and Rowan, L. “Landscaping on Shifting Ground: Teacher Education in a Digitally Transforming Worldâ€, Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, Vol 36, No. 3, pp. 245-255, 2008.

Bryant, T. “Social Software in Academiaâ€, Educause Quarterly, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 61-64, 2006.

Bush, M. D, and Brown, J. M., “Teaching Arabic with Technology at BYU: Learning from the Past to Bridge to the Futureâ€, CALICO Journal, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 497-522, 2004.

Churchill, D., “Educational Applications of Web 2.0: Using Blogs to Support Teaching and Learningâ€, British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 40, No. 1. pp. 179–183, 2009.

Dale, R., Robertson, S. and Shortis, T., “You Can't Not Go with the Technological Flow, Can You?’ Constructing ‘ICT’ and ‘Teaching and Learningâ€, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning Special Issue, Vol. 20, No. 6, pp. 456-470, 2004.

Del Carlo, D., Hinkhouse, H, and Isbell, L., “Developing a Reflective Practitioner through the Connection between Educational Research and Reflective Practicesâ€, Journal of Science Education and Technology, No. 9, pp. 58–68, 2010.

Hargadon, S., “Web 2.0 is the Future of Educationâ€, 2008. Retrieved October 10, 2013, from http://www.stevehargadon.com/2008/03/web-20-is-future-of-education.html

Heilbroner, R. L., “Do Machines Make History? Technology and Culture, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 335-345, 1967.

Ingold, C. W., and Wang, S. C., “The Teachers We Need: Transforming World Language Education in the United Statesâ€, 2010, College Park, MD: University of Maryland National Foreign Language Center. Retrieved October 12, 2015, from: http://www.nflc.org/publications/the_teachers_we_need.pdf

LeBaron, J. & McDonough, “E. Research Report for GeSci Meta-review of ICT in Education, Phase Twoâ€, Global E-Scholars and Communities Initiative (GESCI), 2009. Retrieved September 18, 2014, from http://www.gesci.org

Luckin, R., Clark, W., Graber, R., Logan, K. Mee, A. and Oliver. M., “Do Web 2.0 Tools Really Open the Door to Learning? Practices, Perceptions and Profiles of 11–16â€Yearâ€Old Studentsâ€, Learning, Media and Technologyâ€, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 87-104, 2009.

McLoughlin, C., and Lee, M. J. W., “Future Learning Landscapes: Transforming Pedagogy through Social Softwareâ€, Innovate: Journal of Online Education, Vol. 4, No. 5. Retrieved October 22, 2015 from http://www.innovateonline.info/index.php?view=article&id=539

Neri A., C. Cuchiarini, H. Strik and L. Boves, “The Pedagogy-Technology Interface in Computer Assisted Pronunciation Trainingâ€, Computer Assisted Language Learning, Vol. 5, No. 5, 5, pp. 441–467, 2002.

OECD, “Inspired by Technology, Driven by Pedagogy: A Systemic Approach to Technology-Based School Innovationsâ€, Centre for Educational Research and Innovation, OECD Publishing, 2010. Retrieved March 7, 2016, from https://research.pearson.com/articles/is-technology-thekillerapp.html

O’ Reilly, T, “What is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Softwareâ€, 2005. Retrieved September 7, 2014, from http://oreilly.com/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html

Prensky, M., “They Function Best When Networked: Digital Natives, Digital Immigrantsâ€, On the Horizon, Vol. 9, No. 5, 2001a. Retrieved August 6, 2014, from http://www.marcprensky.com/writing/Prensky%20-%20Digital%20Natives,%20Digital%20Immigrants%20-%20Part1.pdf

Prensky, M., “Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants, Part II: Do They Really Think Differently? On the Horizonâ€, Vol. 9, No. 6, 2001b. Retrieved August 6, 2011, from http://www.marcprensky.com/writing/Prensky%20-%20Digital%20Natives,%20Digital%20Immigrants%20-%20Part2.pdf

Salomon, G., “Technology and Pedagogy: Why Don’t We See the Promised Revolution?â€, Educational Technology, Vol. 42, No. 2, pp. 71-75, 2002.

Selwyn, N, Schools and Schooling in the Digital Age: A Critical Analysis. Routledge, 2011.

Selwyn, N, “Web 2.0 and the School of the Future, Todayâ€, paper presented to OECD/CERI Expert meeting on ‘The School of the Future, Today’, Santa Catarina, Brazil, 18th to 20th November 2009, pp. 23-39, 2010. Retrieved August 2, 2015, from http://www.scribd.com/doc/24171406/Web-2-0-and-the-school-of-the-future-today

Selwyn, N., “In Defence of Digital Difference: A Critical Perspective on the Curricular Challenges of Web 2.0â€, paper presented to Portuguese Association of Educational Telematics 6th International Conference in Information and Communication Technologies in Education, 2009a. Retrieved October 10, 2013, from http://api.ning.com/files/HzMBmdEJLQWlrIidvALatmL0bh-fW90tXDBkamios8BpxMlPsnQGnouQq5*2hy0TkGv6R0*VqColcFTXMou*a-tHTIp3QjEB/Portugal.pdf (Link no longer active).

Selwyn, N., “Challenging Educational Expectations of the Social Web: A Web 2.0 Far?â€, Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, No. 2, pp. 1-11, 2009b.

Selwyn, N., “Web 2.0 Applications as Alternative Environments for Informal Learning - A Critical Reviewâ€, paper for OECD-KERIS expert meeting - Session 6 - Alternative learning environments in practice: using ICT to change impact and outcomes, 2007. Retrieved August 15, 2014, from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/32/3/39458556.pdf

Snart, J. A., Hybrid Learning: The Perils and Promise of Blending Online and Face-to-face Instruction in Higher Education. Greenwood Publishing Group, 2010.

Tondeur, J, Braak, J. v & Valcke, M., “Curricular and the Use of ICT in Education: Two Worlds Apart?â€, British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 38, No. 6, pp. 962-976, 2007.

Downloads

Published

2017-10-24

How to Cite

Who’s Steering: Technology or Pedagogy? Analyzing an Arabic Immersion Experience. (2017). Asian Journal of Education and E-Learning, 5(5). https://ajouronline.com/index.php/AJEEL/article/view/4070

Similar Articles

1-10 of 86

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.