Students' perception on Use of Technology in the class room at Higher Education Institution in Phillipines


  • Virginia Carbonarra Gorra Senior Lecturer Surigao State College of Technology
  • Shyam Bhati University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia


E-learning, Unintended consequences


ABSTRACT— The issueof unintended consequences of use of technology in class room is importantbecause unintended consequences can cause disruption in class room and negatethe institutional policies as regards strategic direction and intervention inteaching and learning process. The current literature on the use of e-learningfor teaching focuses on factors which increases the effectiveness of e-learningbut there is very little research on unintended consequences of e-learning,particularly in regard to developing countries. The present research seeks tofill in this  gap in the research Thisresearch investigates the consequences of the use oftechnology during classroom activities in higher education institutions ofPhilippines when the students are expected to do classwork and attend to theirwork in the college. These questions were studied using a survey methodof research. The students sample consisted of 221 students from different statecolleges and universities in Caraga region of Philippines. Students’perceptions on positive and negativeconsequences were observed. A ranking and frequency analysis method was used tocalculate the consequences observed. The most observed positive consequenceswere instant messaging through chatting, lesson enquiry about assignments,sending and receiving e-mails, research through surfing the net including datagathering by downloading files and sharing cultural experiences with othersthrough internet. Among the negative consequences listed by students wereaccessing social websites like face book, twitter etc. during class work,playing games, playing music, answering and returning calls and downloading andusing copyrighted material. It is further observed that incidence of positiveand negative consequences vary with the use of technology. The ranking of positive and negative consequences differ inall the three cases of use of technology - computer with internet, laptop withinternet and mobile with internet. From the frequency analysis of positive,negative and net consequences of use of technology in class room it is observedthat students are most likely to have negative consequences using mobile withinternet. It is concluded that most students in state colleges and universitiesin Caraga region in the Philippines are likely to use technology in classroomfor the purpose of positive consequences supporting the view that use oftechnology helps in enhancing learning related activities in classroom

Author Biography

Shyam Bhati, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia

Lecturer, School of Accounting, Economics and Finance


Blumenfeld, P., B.J.Fishman, J.Krajin and R.W.Marx, “Creative useable innovations in systemic reforms: Scaling up technology-embedded project based science in urban schools.†Educational Psychologists Vol 35(3), pp.149-164, 2000..

Bugeja, Michael J. “Distraction in wireless class room.†Chronicles of Higher Education, Vol. 53, No. 21, pp.C1-C4, 2008.

Fang, Berlin, “From distraction to engagement: Wireless devices in class room.†Educause Quarterly Vol 32, No. 4, 2009.

Fried, Carry B. “In-class laptop use and its effect on student’s learning.†Computer and Education, Vol 50, no. 3, pp. 906-914, 2008.

Furr, Paula F., S.G.Horton and Karen McFerrin “Technologies’ unintended consequences: International lessons needed to prepare teachers and students.†I C. Crawford et al (Eds), Proceedings of International Conference of Society for International Technology and Teacher Education., Cherapeake, pp.3183-3190, 2005.

Gamboa, Charity T., “The language business.â€, Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 1-5, 2008.

George, P.P., N. Papachistron, J.M.Belisario, W.Wang, P.A.Wark, Z.Cotic, K.Rasmussen, R.Sluiter, E.Riboli-Sasco, L.T.Car, E.M.Musulanov, J.Molina, B.H.Heng, Y.Zhang, E.L.Wheeler, N.A.Shorbaji, A.Majeed and J.Car, “Online e-learning for undergraduates in health professionals: A systematic review of the impact of knowledge, skills, attitudes and satisfaction.†Journal of Global Health, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2014.

Gustafson, K.L. and R.M. Branch “What is instructional design?â€, In R.A. Reiser and J.V.Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and Issues in Instructional Design and Technology, Upper Saddle River, NJ, Pearson Education, 2002.

Harandi, S.R. “Effect of e-learning on students’ motivation†Proceeding – Social and Behaviourial Science, 181, pp. 423-430, 2015.

Hermann, Allan, Robert Fox and Anna Boyd “Unintended effects in using learning technologies.†New Direction for Adults ad Continuing Education, 88, p.39-47, 2000. Jossey-Bass, Wiley.

Hutchins, C.L. “System thinking.â€, Aurora CO; Professional Development Systems, 1996.

[ Kearsley, G. “Educational technology: A critique.†Educational Technology, Vol. 38(2), pp.47-51, 1998.

Lazarro, Dorothy and E.M.Medalla, “English as the language of trade, finance and technology in APEC: An east Asia perspective.â€, Philippines Journal of Development, Vol. 31, pp. 277-300, 2004.

Lumadi, M.W. “E-learning impact on academic performance of student -teachers.†Mediterranean Journal of Social Science, Vol. 4, No. 14, 2013.

Merton, R.K. “The unanticipated consequences of purposive social action.†American Sociological Review, Vol. (1), 6, 894-904, 1936.

Noessgard, S. S. and R. Orngreen, “The effectiveness of e-learning: An exploratory and integrative reviews of definitions, methodologies and factors that promote e-learning effectiveness.†The electronic journal of e-learning. Vol. 13, Issue 4, 2015, pp. 278-290, 2015.

Norton, R., “Unintended consequences.†in D.R.Hendersen (ed.), “The concise encyclopaedia of economics.†The library of economics and liberty, Indianapolis Liberty Fund, 2002.

Nworie, John and N.Houghton, “Good intentions and unanticipated effects: The uni9ntended consequences of application of technology in teaching and learning environments.â€, Tech Trends, Vol, 5, 5, pp.52-58 2008.

Oye, N.D., N.Ilahad, M.J.madar and N.Ab.Rahim, “The impact of e-learning on students’ performance in tertiary institutions.†Journal of Computer Networks and Wireless Communication. Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 121-130, 2012.

Portes, A., “The hidden abode: Sociology as an analysis of unexpected.†American Sociological Review, Vol. 65, pp.1-18, 2000.

Safaavi, A.A., “Developing countries and e-learning program development.â€, Journal of Global Information Technology Management, Vol. 11, 3, pp.47-64, 2008.

Tenner, E. “Why things bite back.†New York, Vintage Books, 1996.

Thaket, T.S. and N.V.Kalyankar “The effect of e-learning approaches on students’ delayed achievement in fraction maths course 5 at Yemen’s public primary school.†International Journal of Engineering Science and Advanced Technology, Vol. 4, Issue 2, pp. 206-213, 2012.




How to Cite

Gorra, V. C., & Bhati, S. (2016). Students’ perception on Use of Technology in the class room at Higher Education Institution in Phillipines. Asian Journal of Education and E-Learning, 4(3). Retrieved from