The Role of Working Memory in the Comprehension of Relative Clauses by Chinese Dyslexic Children
Keywords:
Chinese dyslexia, Working memory, sentence comprehension, relative clausesAbstract
Previous psycholinguistic studies on the processing of relative clauses delineate the importance of working memory in sentence comprehension. This study further investigates the role of working memory in the comprehension of Chinese relative clauses by dyslexic children who have reading and writing difficulties in Chinese. In this study, a computerized sentence listening and reading comprehension test was designed to assess to what extent dyslexic children comprehend Chinese sentences consisting of three types of relative clauses. The results of the test indicate that dyslexic children were significantly worse that their non-dyslexic counterparts with comparable educational level, age and IQ in both listening and reading comprehension of relative clauses. Dyslexic children had great difficulty in comprehending the subject-extracted relative clauses which involve heavy working memory load in restructuring the word order for comprehension. The findings of the study highlight the importance of working memory in sentence comprehension by dyslexic children, and shed light on the enhancement of sentence comprehension of dyslexic children. It is proposed that language games and computerized language tasks can be used for training the working memory of dyslexic children, which in turn faciliates the sentence comprehension that is essential for text comprehension.
References
Chan, D., Ho, C., Tsang, S.-M., Lee, S.-H., & Chung, K., “Exploring the Reading–Writing Connection in Chinese Children with Dyslexia in Hong Kongâ€, Reading and Writing, vol. 19, no.6, pp.543-561, 2006.
Chik, P. P. M., Ho, C. S. H., Yeung, P. S., Wong, Y. K., Chan, D. W. O., Chung, K. K. H. & Lo, L. Y., “Contribution of Discourse and Morphosyntax Skills to Reading Comprehension in Chinese Dyslexic and Typically Developing Childrenâ€, Annals of Dyslexia-Springer.com, pp.1-18, 2010.
Chik, P. P. M., Ho, C. S. H., Yeung, P. S., Chan, D. W. O., Chung, K. K. H., Luan, H., Lo, L. Y. & Lau, W. S. Y., “Syntactic Skills in Sentence Reading Comprehension among Chinese Elementary School Childrenâ€, Reading and Writing, vol. 24, pp. 1-21, 2011.
Chung, K. K. H. & Ho, C. S.-H., “Second Language Learning Difficulties in Chinese Children with Dyslexia: What are the Reading-Related Cognitive Skills that Contribute to English and Chinese Word Reading?â€, Journal of Learning Disabilities, vol. 43, pp.195-211, 2010.
Hsiao, F. & Gibson, E., “Processing Relative Clauses in Chineseâ€,Cognition, vol. 90, no.1,pp. 3-27, 2003.
Ho, C. S.-H., Chan, D.W.-O., Tsang, S.-M, Lee, S.-H., “The Cognitive Profile and Multiple-Deficit Hypothesis in Chinese Developmental Dyslexiaâ€, Developmental Psychology, vol.38, pp.543-553, 2002.
Ho, C. S.-H., Chan, D.W.-O., Lee, S.-H. Tsang, S.-M, Luan, V. H., “Cognitive Profiling and Preliminary Subtyping in Chinese Developmental Dyslexiaâ€, Cognition, vol. 91, pp.43-75, 2004.
Ho, C. S.-H., Chan, D. W., Tsang, S.-M, Lee, S-H, Chung, K. K. H., “Word leaning deficit among Chinese dyslexic childrenâ€, Journal of child language, vol.33, pp. 145-161, 2006.
Ho, C. S.-H., Chan, D. W., Chung, K. K. H., Lee, S.-H., Tsang, S.-M.,“In Search of Subtypes of Chinese Developmental Dyslexiaâ€, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, vol.97, pp. 61-83, 2007.
Leong, C., Hau, K., Tse, S., & Loh, K., “Component Skills of Text Comprehension in Less Competent Chinese Comprehendersâ€, Annals of Dyslexia, vol. 57, no.1, pp. 75-97, 2007.
Lin, C. J. C. & Bever, T. G., “Subject Preference in the Processing of Relative Clauses in Chineseâ€, In D. Baumer, D. Montero & M. Scanlon (Eds.), Proceedings of the 25th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics , Somerville, M.A.-Cascadilla Proceedings Project, pp. 254-260, 2006.
Pickering, S. J., “Working Memory in Dyslexia, In T. P. Alloway & S. E. Gathercole (Eds.),Working Memory and Neurodevelopmental Disorders, Hove; New York-Psychology Press, 2006.
Raven, J. C., Standard Progressive Matrices (Kit). London-Pearson Assessment, UK, 2006.
Reilly, J., “The Speech and Language therapistâ€, In P. Thomson & P. Gilchrist (Eds.), Dyslexia: A Multidisciplinary Approach, London-Chapman & Hall, UK, 1997.
Young, P. & Tyre, C., Dyslexia or Illiteracy?: Realizing the Right to Read, Milton Keynes Philadelphia-Open University Press, USA, 1983.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
- Papers must be submitted on the understanding that they have not been published elsewhere (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, or thesis) and are not currently under consideration by another journal published by any other publisher.
- It is also the authors responsibility to ensure that the articles emanating from a particular source are submitted with the necessary approval.
- The authors warrant that the paper is original and that he/she is the author of the paper, except for material that is clearly identified as to its original source, with permission notices from the copyright owners where required.
- The authors ensure that all the references carefully and they are accurate in the text as well as in the list of references (and vice versa).
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
- The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.
