Academic Achievement and Gender Peer Effects on Social Comparisons and Self-Regulated Learning Behaviors in A Taiwanese EFL Context
Keywords:peer effects, social comparisons, self-regulated learning behaviors, English as a Foreign Language (EFL)
The main purpose of the present article is to estimate academic achievement and gender peer effects on social comparisons and self-regulated learning behaviors in a Taiwanese EFL context. The participating students were 50 non-English-major freshmen studying in Central Taiwan. Analyses of the data reveal the following findings. First, female students preferred or felt more comfortable making social comparisons with other female students, and they applied more self-regulated learning strategies. Second, male students had a stronger drive to make social comparisons, and they would prepare harder over time for the tests. Third, students with relatively low ability tended toward upward comparison and tended to give up or only study the easy parts.
Arefi, M., Naghibzadeh, M., & Boloki, A. (2014). The relationship of parental attachment, peer attachment, and academic self-concept to academic achievement of high school students. International Journal of Academic Research, 6(5), 73-78.
Banarjee, P., & Kumar, K. (2014). A Study on Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement among the Science Graduate Students. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Approach & Studies, 1(6), 329-342.
Bidjerano, T. (2005). Gender differences in self-regulated learning. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Northeastern Educational Research Association, October 19-21, Kerhonkson, NY, USA.
Brunello, G., De Paola, M., & Scoppa, V. (2010). Peer effects in higher education: Does the field of study matter?. Economic Inquiry, 48(3), 621-634.
Bui, K. V. T., & Pelham, B. W. (1999). Cognitive and affective reactions to social comparison. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 14, 569â€“583.
Burke, M. A., & Sass, T. R. (2013). Classroom peer effects and student achievement. Journal of Labor Economics, 31(1), 51-82.
Buunk, B. P., Kuyper, H., & Van der Zee, Y. G. (2005). Affective response to social comparison in the classroom. Basic and applied social psychology, 27(3), 229-237.
Carman, K. G., & Zhang, L. (2012). Classroom peer effects and academic achievement: Evidence from a Chinese middle school. China Economic Review, 23(2), 223-237.
Celant, S. (2013). The analysis of students' academic achievement: the evaluation of peer effects through relational links. Quality & Quantity, 47(2), 615-631.
Chen, H. H. J. (2011). Developing and evaluating an oral skills training website supported by automatic speech recognition technology. ReCALL, 23(01), 59-78.
Dijkstra, P., Kuyper, H., van der Werf, G., Buunk, A. P., & van der Zee, Y. G. (2008). Social comparison in the classroom: A review. Review of Educational Research, 78(4), 828-879.
Eisenkopf, G. (2010). Peer effects, motivation, and learning. Economics of Education Review, 29(3), 364-374.
Erten, Ä°. H., & Burden, R. L. (2014). The relationship between academic self-concept, attributions, and L2 achievement. System, 42, 391-401.
Felicio, D. M., & Miller, C. T. (1994). Social comparison in medical school: What students say about gender and similarity. Basic and applied social psychology, 15(3), 277-296.
Ficano, C. C. (2012). Peer effects in college academic outcomes â€“ Gender matters! Economics of Education Review, 31(6), 1102-1115.
Foster, G., & Frijters, P. (2010). Students' beliefs about peer effects. Economics Letters, 108(3), 260-263.
Gamoran, A., & Berends, M. (1987). The effects of stratification in secondary schools: Synthesis of survey and ethnographic research. Review of educational research, 57(4), 415-435.
Gest, S. D., Rulison, K. L., Davidson, A. J., & Welsh, J. A. (2008). A reputation for success (or failure): the association of peer academic reputations with academic self-concept, effort, and performance across the upper elementary grades. Developmental psychology, 44(3), 625.
Ginsburg-Block, M. D., Rohrbeck, C. A., & Fantuzzo, J. W. (2006). A meta-analytic review of social, self-concept, and behavioral outcomes of peer-assisted learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(4), 732-749.
Griffith, A. L., & Rask, K. N. (2014). Peer effects in higher education: A look at heterogeneous impacts. Economics of Education Review, 39, 65-77.
Guay, F., Ratelle, C. F., Roy, A., & Litalien, D. (2010). Academic self-concept, autonomous academic motivation, and academic achievement: Mediating and additive effects. Learning & Individual Differences, 20(6), 644-653.
Hsieh, K. T., Dong, D. H., & Wang, L. Y. (2013). A preliminary study of applying shadowing technique to English intonation instruction. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics, 11(2), 43-65.
Ireson, J., & Hallam, S. (2009). Academic self-concepts in adolescence: Relations with achievement and ability grouping in schools. Learning and Instruction, 19(3), 201-213.
Kesici, S., & Erdogan, A. (2010). Mathematics anxiety according to middle school students' achievement motivation and social comparison. Education, 131(1), 54-63.
Kiss, D. (2013). The impact of peer achievement and peer heterogeneity on own achievement growth: Evidence from school transitions. Economics of Education Review, 37, 58-65.
Lu, J. H., & Jaw, G. Y. (2010). Applying MyET Oral Practice Database to Upgrade College Studentsâ€™ English Speaking Ability. In World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (Vol. 2010, No. 1, pp. 1111-1115).
Marsh, H. W., & Hau, K. T. (2003). Big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept: A cross-cultural (26-country) test of the negative effects of academically selective schools. American Psychologist, 58(5), 364-376.
Marsh, H. W., & Martin, A. J. (2011). Academic selfâ€concept and academic achievement: Relations and causal ordering. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(1), 59-77.
Marsh, H. W., Byrne, B. M., & Yeung, A. S. (1999). Causal ordering of academic self-concept and achievement: Reanalysis of a pioneering study and... Educational Psychologist, 34(3), 155-167.
Marsh, H. W., Kuyper, H., Morin, A. J., Parker, P. D., & Seaton, M. (2014). Big-fish-little-pond social comparison and local dominance effects: Integrating new statistical models, methodology, design, theory and substantive implications. Learning & Instruction, 33, 50-66.
Marsh, H.W., Hau, K., & Kong, C. (2002). Multilevel causal ordering of academic self-concept and achievement: influence of language of instruction (English compared with Chinese) for Hong Kong students. American Educational Research Journal, 39(3), 727â€“763.
Marsh, H. W., Trautwein, U., Ludtke, O., KÃ¶ller, O., & Baumert, J. (2005). Academic Self-Concept, Interest, Grades, and Standardized Test Scores: Reciprocal Effects Models of Causal Ordering. Child Development, 76(2), 397-416.
MyET. (2017). About L Labs. Retrieved from http://www.myet.com/MyETWeb/
Oosterbeek, H., & van Ewijk, R. (2014). Gender peer effects in university: Evidence from a randomized experiment. Economics of Education Review, 38, 51-63.
Preckel, F., Niepel, C., Schneider, M., & Brunner, M. (2013). Self-concept in adolescence: A longitudinal study on reciprocal effects of self-perceptions in academic and social domains. Journal Of Adolescence, 36(6), 1165-1175.
Preckel, F., Zeidner, M., Goetz, T., & Schleyer, E. J. (2008). Female â€˜big fishâ€™ swimming against the tide: The â€˜big-fish-little-pond effectâ€™and gender-ratio in special gifted classes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(1), 78-96.
Prince, D., & Nurius, P. S. (2014). The role of positive academic self-concept in promoting school success. Children & Youth Services Review, 43, 145-152.
Rodriguez, C. M. (2009). The impact of academic selfâ€concept, expectations and the choice of learning strategy on academic achievement: the case of business students. Higher Education Research & Development, 28(5), 523-539.
Schunk, D. & Zimmerman, B. (2007). Influencing childrenâ€™s self-efficacy and self-regulation of reading and writing through modeling. Reading & WritingQuarterly, 23(1), 7-25.
Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1989). Development of test anxiety in high school students. In I. G. Sarason & C. D. Spielberger (Eds.), Stress and anxiety (Vol. 12, pp. 65â€“79). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
Suls, J. M. & Wheeler, L. (2000). Handbook of social comparison: Theory and research. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Summers, A. A., & Wolfe, B. L. (1977). Do schools make a difference? The American Economic Review, 67(4), 639-652.
Sund, K. (2009). Estimating peer effects in Swedish high school using school, teacher, and student fixed effects. Economics of Education Review, 28(3), 329-336.
Sung, Y., Huang, L., Tseng, F., & Chang, K. (2014). The aspects and ability groups in which little fish perform worse than big fish: Examining the big-fish-little-pond effect in the context of school tracking. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39(3), 220-232.
Tholander, M. (2011). â€˜How long was your poem?â€™ Social comparison among junior high school students. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 24(1), 31-54.
Van Soom, C., & Donche, V. (2014). Profiling First-Year Students in STEM Programs Based on Autonomous Motivation and Academic Self-Concept and Relationship with Academic Achievement. Plos One, 9(11), 1-13.
Vardardottir, A. (2013). Peer effects and academic achievement: a regression discontinuity approach. Economics of Education Review, 36, 108-121.
Wong, M. S. W., & Watkins, D. (2001). Self-esteem and ability grouping: A Hong Kong investigation of the Big-Fish-Little-Pond-Effect. Educational Psychology, 21, 79-87.
Wouters, S., Colpin, H., Van Damme, J., De Laet, S., & Verschueren, K. (2013). Early adolescents' academic self-concept formation: Do classmates or friends matter most? Learning & Individual Differences, 27, 193-200.
Wouters, S., Germeijs, V., Colpin, H. & Verschueren, K. (2011). Academic self-concept in high school: Predictors and effects on adjustment in higher education. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 52, 586â€“594.
Yukselturk, E., & Bulut, S. (2009). Gender differences in self-regulated online learning environment. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 12(3), 12.
Zeidner, M., & Schleyer, E. J. (1998). The big-fishâ€“little-pond effect for academic self-concept, test anxiety, and school grades in gifted children. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24(4), 305-329.
Zimmerman, D. J. (2003). Peer effects in academic outcomes: Evidence from a natural experiment. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(1), 9-23.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), pp. 166-183.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82 (1), 51-59.
Zumbrunn, S., Tadlock, J., & Roberts, E. D. (2011). Encouraging self-regulated learning in the classroom: A review of the literature. Metropolitan Educational Research Consortium (MERC), 1-28.
How to Cite
- Papers must be submitted on the understanding that they have not been published elsewhere (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, or thesis) and are not currently under consideration by another journal published by any other publisher.
- It is also the authors responsibility to ensure that the articles emanating from a particular source are submitted with the necessary approval.
- The authors warrant that the paper is original and that he/she is the author of the paper, except for material that is clearly identified as to its original source, with permission notices from the copyright owners where required.
- The authors ensure that all the references carefully and they are accurate in the text as well as in the list of references (and vice versa).
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
- The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.