Pragmatic Transfer in Moroccan EFL Learners’ Requests

Authors

  • Ayoub Loutfi Theoretical Linguistics

Keywords:

Pragmatic Transfer, EFL Learners, Requestive Strategies, Pragmatic Competence.

Abstract

Chomsky’s generative paradigm has invaded and informed linguistic research and hence all linguistic subfields. The field of Second Language Acquisition (SLA) has not been exempted from this ostensible invasion. Yet, research conducted within this new paradigm has focused only on exploring and teaching formal grammatical forms; other components of linguistic competence, namely Pragmatics, have been pushed to the edges. More recently (Kasper & Blum-Kulka, 1993; Kasper, 1992; Ishihara & Cohen, 2010 among others), however, a growing interest in the effects of culture and native language on the development of the learners’ L2 has brought into focus the fact that for non-native speakers/ L2 learners to achieve a fully-fledged competence in the target language, they have, of necessity, to consider the sociocultural and pragmatic aspects of the target language. For this reason, the present paper is couched within the area of Interlanguage Pragmatics (ILP), the aim being to address the issue of the role of pragmatic competence in SLA in general and, more particularly, in a Moroccan EFL context. Conducted within the framework of the Cross-Cultural Speech Act Realization Project (CCSARP), this study, then, purports to investigate the issue of pragmatic transfer from L1 into the Interlanguage of Moroccan learners of English, particularly when these learners make requests in English. The two main hypotheses that the present paper attempts to defend are: (i) there is pragmatic transfer in the English requests produced by Moroccan learners of English, both from a Pragmalinguistic and Sociopragmatic perspective; (ii) L2 pragmatic competence acquisition is still wanting among Moroccan advanced students. The participants involved in this study are Moroccan university learners of English (second year and third year) and native speakers of English. Under this light, this study seeks to compare the average frequencies of direct and indirect strategies used by both native Moroccan English as a foreign language learners and native English speakers. Finally, this study will further attempt to explore whether transfer decreases as the study level increases. The paper concludes with some pedagogical implications.

References

. Achiba, M. 2003. Learning to Request in a Second Language: A Study of Child Interlanguage Pragmatics. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters, LTD.

. Austin, J. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

. Bachman, L. F. 1990. Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing. Oxford. Oxford, University press.

. Barron, A. 2003. Acquisition in Interlanguage Pragmatics: Learning how to Do things with Words in a Study Abroad Context. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

. Benbarka, L. 2002. Pragmatic Transfer in EFL Moroccan Learners’ Apologies. Unpublished DESA dissertation, Faculty of Education. Mohamed V, Souissi, Rabat

. Blum-Kulka, S. 1982. “Learning to Say what You Mean in a Second Language: A Study of the Speech Act Performance of Learners of Hebrew as a Second Languageâ€. Applied Linguistics 3, 29–59.

. Blum-Kulka, S. 1987. “Indirectness and politeness in requests: Same or different? Journal of Pragmatics 11, 131–46.

. Blum-Kulka, S. 1989. “Playing it Safe: The Role of Conventionality in Indirectnessâ€. In S. Blum-Kulka, J. House and G. Kasper (Eds), Cross-cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies, (37–70). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

. Blum-Kulka, S. and Olshtain, E. (1984) Requests and apologies: A cross-cultural study of speech act realization patterns (CCSARP). Applied Linguistics 5, 196–213.

. Blum-Kulka, S., House, J. and Kasper, G. (Eds) (1989a) Cross-cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

. Brown, H. D. 2007. Principles of Language Learning and Teaching (5th ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman.

. Chomsky, N. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press.

. Ellis, R. 1997. Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

. Firth, A., & Wagner, J. 1997. “On Discourse, Communication, and (some) Fundamental Concepts in SLA Researchâ€. Modern Language Journal, 81, 286-300.

. Kasper, G. 1997. “Can Pragmatic Competence be Taught?†(NFLRC Net Work No. 6.) Honolulu: University of Hawaii at Manoa, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center.

. Kasper, G., & Blum-Kulka, S. 1993. “Interlanguage Pragmatics: An Introductionâ€. In G. Kasper & S. Blum-Kulka (Eds.), Interlanguage Pragmatics, (3 –18). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

. Kasper, G. and Schmidt, R. 1996 “Developmental Issues in Interlanguage Pragmaticsâ€. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18, 149–69.

. Hymes, D. H. 1972. “On communicative competenceâ€. In J. B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics, (269–293). Harmondsworth: Penguin.

. Ishihara, N. 2010. “Teachers’ Pragmatics: Knowledge, Beliefs, and Practice. In N. Ishihara & A.D. Cohen (Eds.), Teaching and Learning Pragmatics: Where culture and language meet, (21–36). Harlow: Pearson Education.

. Latif, H. 2001. A Sociopragmatic Study of EFL Moroccan Learners’ Requests. Unpublished DESA dissertation, Faculty of Education. Mohamed V, Souissi, Rabat.

. Lin, M. 2008. “Pragmatic Failure in Intercultural Communication and English Teaching in Chinaâ€. China Media Research, 4(3), 43-52.

. Searle, J. R. 1975b. “Indirect Speech Actsâ€. In Cole & Morgan (1975: 58-82). Reprinted in Searle (1979b: 30-57).

. Selinker, L. 1974. “Interlanguageâ€. Error Analysis: Perspectives on Second Language Acquisition, Richards, J. C. (Ed.), (31-54). London: Longman.

. Thomas, J. 1983. “Cross-cultural Pragmatic Failureâ€. Applied Linguistics 4, 91-109.

Downloads

Published

2016-02-15

How to Cite

Loutfi, A. (2016). Pragmatic Transfer in Moroccan EFL Learners’ Requests. Asian Journal of Education and E-Learning, 4(1). Retrieved from https://ajouronline.com/index.php/AJEEL/article/view/1341

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 1 (2016): February 2016

Section

Articles

License

  • Papers must be submitted on the understanding that they have not been published elsewhere (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, or thesis) and are not currently under consideration by another journal published by any other publisher.
  • It is also the authors responsibility to ensure that the articles emanating from a particular source are submitted with the necessary approval.
  • The authors warrant that the paper is original and that he/she is the author of the paper, except for material that is clearly identified as to its original source, with permission notices from the copyright owners where required.
  • The authors ensure that all the references carefully and they are accurate in the text as well as in the list of references (and vice versa).
  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  • The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.