Using Contextualized Reading Tasks for Improving Incidental Vocabulary Retention among Iranian EFL Learners
Keywords:
Incidental Vocabulary Learning, Task Type, Time Devoted on Tasks, Delayed Vocabulary Test, Vocabulary RetentionAbstract
Vocabulary is central to English language teaching because without sufficient vocabulary students cannot understand others or express their own ideas. Vocabulary knowledge also plays an important role in almost all areas of language learning. So, the purpose of this study was to identify the relationship between the incidental vocabulary learning, task types, time devoted on tasks, and vocabulary retention of EFL learners. To achieve the aim, this research employed a quasi-experimental design to investigate the possible effects of various contextualized reading tasks and timing on the L2 incidental vocabulary acquisition of Iranian EFL learners. Sixty intermediate EFL learners in six intact classes in Zabansara language institute in Isfahan were accessed. Three classes were respectively exposed to dictionary-based, fill-in-the-blank, and sentence-making tasks with time restrictions, and the other three classes were respectively exposed to dictionary-based, fill-in-the-blank, and sentence-making tasks without time restrictions. Having experienced their relevant treatments, the participants were asked to take a delayed vocabulary test. Since task type and timing were two independent variables and vocabulary learning/recall was the dependent variable of the study, two-way ANOVA was used to compare the learners’ vocabulary scores on the delayed vocabulary test. The results revealed that time restriction exerted a significant effect on the performance of the learners in all the three groups on the delayed tests. Also, learners in the groups without time restriction significantly outperformed those in the groups with time restriction.
References
• Ellis, N. C. (1994). Implicit and explicit learning of languages. Academic Press.
• Farhady, H., & Delshad, S. (2007). An Introductory to Methodology for TEFL/TESL. Tehran: SAMT Publications.
• Hogben, D., & Lawson, M. J. (1994). Keyword and multiple elaboration strategies for vocabulary acquisition in foreign language learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19(3), 367–376.
• Huckin, T., & Coady, J. (1999). Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(02), 181–193.
• Hulstijn, J. H., & Trompetter, P. (1998). Incidental learning of second language vocabulary in computer-assisted reading and writing tasks.
• Johnstone, T., & Shanks, D. R. (2001). Abstractionist and processing accounts of implicit learning. Cognitive Psychology, 42(1), 61–112.
• Laufer, B., & Hulstijn, J. (2001). Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: The construct of task-induced involvement. Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 1–26.
• Lee, C. (2003). The effect of involvement load on English vocabulary acquisition in an incidental learning situation. Unpublished Master’s Thesis). National Tsinghua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
• Liu, W., Yun, J., Chen, N., Tsao, S., McCormack, S., & Wheeler, N. (2002). Reading master. Taipei: AMC Publishers.
• Mayer, R. E. (2003). Learning and instruction. Prentice Hall.
• Mazzeo, C., Rab, S. Y., & Alssid, J. L. (2003). Building Bridges to College and Careers: Contextualized Basic Skills Programs at Community Colleges.
• McKenna, M. C., & Robinson, R. D. (2013). Teaching through text: Reading and writing in the content areas. Pearson Higher Ed.
• Moltz, D. (2010). Encouraging deep learning. Inside Higher Ed.
• Mondria, J.-A. (2003). The effects of inferring, verifying, and memorizing on the retention of L2 word meanings. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25(04), 473–499.
• Moradian, F. (2005). Incidental Vocabulary Learning through Reading for Pleasure Among Iranian high School Students. Isfahan University.
• Nation, I. S. P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. New York: Newbury House.
• Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Ernst Klett Sprachen.
• Nunan, D. (1992). Research methods in language learning. Cambridge University Press.
• Paquette, K. R., & Kaufman, C. C. (2008). Merging civic and literacy skills. The Social Studies, 99(4), 187–192.
• Paribakht, T. S., & Wesche, M. (1997). Vocabulary enhancement activities and reading for meaning in second language vocabulary acquisition. Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition: A Rationale for Pedagogy, 174–200.
• Parr, B. A., Edwards, M. C., & Leising, J. G. (2008). Does a Curriculum Integration Intervention to Improve the Mathematics Achievement of Students Diminish Their Acquisition of Technical Competence? An Experimental Study in Agricultural Mechanics. Journal of Agricultural Education, 49(1), 61–71.
• Perin, D., Hare, R. J., Peverly, S. T., & Mason, L. H. (2010). Contextualized written summarization by academically-underprepared community college students. Unpublished Manuscript.
• Scholfield, P. (1997). Vocabulary reference works in foreign language learning. Vocabulary: Description, Acquisition, and Pedagogy, 279–302.
• Simpson, M. L., Hynd, C. R., Nist, S. L., & Burrell, K. I. (1997). College academic assistance programs and practices. Educational Psychology Review, 9(1), 39–87.
• Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford University Press.
• Smith, F. (2004). Understanding Reading: A Psycholinguistic Analysis of Reading and Learning to Read. Routledge.
• Stern, H. H. (1992). Issues and options in language teaching. Oxford Univ Pr.
• Swanborn, M. S. L., & De Glopper, K. (2002). Impact of reading purpose on incidental word learning from context. Language Learning, 52(1), 95–117.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
- Papers must be submitted on the understanding that they have not been published elsewhere (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, or thesis) and are not currently under consideration by another journal published by any other publisher.
- It is also the authors responsibility to ensure that the articles emanating from a particular source are submitted with the necessary approval.
- The authors warrant that the paper is original and that he/she is the author of the paper, except for material that is clearly identified as to its original source, with permission notices from the copyright owners where required.
- The authors ensure that all the references carefully and they are accurate in the text as well as in the list of references (and vice versa).
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
- The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.
