Implementing E-Learning Designed Courses in General Education

Authors

  • Prasart Nuangchalerm Mahasarakham University
  • Krissada Sakkumduang
  • Suleepornn Uhwha
  • Pacharawit Chansirisira

Keywords:

e-learning, general education, instructional practice, satisfaction

Abstract

The aim of this study is to implement e-learning designed course for general education. The study employed 3 phases for developing e-learning course: contextual study, designing, and implementing. Two courses general education, 217 undergraduate students are participated the study. Research tool consisted of interview about e-learning form and learning satisfaction questionnaire. The findings revealed that e-learning courses should not be used alone, but it should be mixed between face to face and e-learning in the appropriate solution. After students had learned through e-learning, they express learning satisfaction at high level and need to be continued e-learning courses in other courses.

 

Author Biography

  • Prasart Nuangchalerm, Mahasarakham University
    Faculty of Education, Mahasarkham University

References

Edelson D.C., Gordin, D.N. & Pea, R.D. (1999). Addressing the challenges of inquiry-based learning through technology and curriculum design. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8(3&4), 391-450.

Callaghan, N. & Bower, M. (2012). Learning through social networking sites- the critical role of the teacher. Educational Media International, 49(1), 1-17.

Herreid, C.F. & Schiller, N.A. (2013). Case studies and the Flipped classroom. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(5), 62-66.

Meijer, A., Grimmelikhuijsen, S. & Brandsma, G.J. (2012). Communities of public service support: citizens engage in social learning in peer-to-peer networks. Government Information Quarterly, 29(1), 21-29.

Pascarella, E.T. & Terenzini, P.T. (1991). How college affects students. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Nawaz, A. (2013). Using e-learning as a tool for ‘education for all’ in developing states. International Journal of Science and Technology Educational Research, 4(3), 38-46.

Ezziane Z (2007). Information technology literacy: Implications on teaching and learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 10(3), 175-191.

Brandi, K. (2005). Are you ready to “Moodle"? Language Learning & Technology, 9(2), 16-23.

Mödritscher, F. (2006). E-learning theories in practice: A comparison of three methods. Journal of Universal Science and Technology of Learning, 3-18.

Anderson, T. (2008). Towards a theory of online learning. Theory and practice of online learning, 45-74.

Paechter, M., Maier, B. & Macher, D. (2010). Students’ expectations of and experiences in e-learning: Their relation to learning achievements and course satisfaction. Computers & Education, 54(1), 222-229.

Lin, C. (2013). Using Moodle in a general education English as a second language program: Taiwanese college student experiences and perspectives. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 3(3), 97-104.

Reeves, T.D. & Pedulla, J.J. (2011). Predictors of teacher satisfaction with online professional development: evidence from the USA’s eâ€Learning for Educators initiative. Professional Development in Education, 37(4), 591-611.

Escobar-Rodriguez, T. & Monge-Lozano, P. (2012). The acceptance of Moodle technology by business administration students. Computers & Education, 58(4), 1085-1093.

Bell, B.S. & Federman, J.E. (2013). E-Learning in postsecondary education. Future for Children, 23(1), 165-185.

Downloads

Published

2014-08-15

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Implementing E-Learning Designed Courses in General Education. (2014). Asian Journal of Education and E-Learning, 2(4). https://ajouronline.com/index.php/AJEEL/article/view/1482

Similar Articles

11-20 of 239

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.