Enzyme Course: Contents, Coverage and Students’ Feedback on Course and Teacher

Authors

  • Kwabena Nsiah Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana

Keywords:

Enzymes, course, evaluation, syllabus, quality assurance

Abstract

This study focuses on the first semester course on Enzymes, as taught in the Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology of the Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana. The course outline and detailed course content have been provided, likewise the instructor’s mode of delivery of lectures. The study provides an avenue for students’ evaluation of one of the core courses taught  in the first semester, Enzymes I. The evaluation was done by two different final year groups of two programmes, Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology (34 students) and Department of Food Science and Technology (17 students). The respondents evaluated the course content (scope and relevance), instructor’s mode of delivery and ranking of instructor. Both groups of students found the course content to be adequate and relevant, and identified some topics as interesting or otherwise. The overall performance of the instructor was rated very high. The study has brought out the views of students on a course and its mode of delivery, which would assist in the future revision of syllabus, as part of the continuous quality assurance programme.

 

References

K. Nsiah, K., Dzogbefia, V. P. Ansong, D. Boateng, H. Ocloo, D. Osei Akoto A. “The pattern of AST and ALT changes in relation to haemolysis in sickle cell diseaseâ€, Clinical Medicine Insights; Blood Disorders, vol 4, pp 1-9, 2011

K. Nsiah, V. P. Dzogbefia, D. Ansong, H. Boateng, D. Ocloo, E. Osei-Frempong, N. Kena Frempong, A. Osei Akoto. “The incidence of malaria and the comparison of hematological and biochemical indices of Plasmodium falciparum-parasitemic and aparasitemic sickle cell disease. (SCD) patients.†Int J Lab Hematol, vol 32, pp e197-e207, 2010

K. Nsiah, E.O. Terlabi, E. Woode, D.D. Obiri, C. Ansah, M. Duwiejua. “Toxicological assessment of Parquetina nigrescens extracts in rats.†J Sci Tech. vol 26, pp 24-31, 2006

D. Dawley,D. Havelka “A curriculum development process model.†J. Coll. Teach. Learn.vol 1, pp 51–55, 2004.

H. M. Anderson,J. Cain,E. Bird “Online student course evaluations: Review of literature and a pilot study.†Am. J. Pharmaceut. Educ. vol 69, pp 34–43, 2005

Lake, D. “Helping students to go SOLO: teaching critical numeracy in the biological sciences.†Journal of Biological Education. vol 33, 191-198, 1999.

Phoenix, D. A. “Numeracy and the life scientist!†Journal of Biological Education. vol 34, 3-4, 1999.

J. G. Voet D. Voet “Student centered teaching.†Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ. vol 33, 133 2010

M. Savin-Baden “Disciplinary differences or modes of curriculum practice: Who promised to deliver what in problem-based learning?†Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ. vol 31, 338–343, 2003.

T.R. Anderson, J.M. Rogan “Bridging the educational research-teaching practice gap: Curriculum development, Part 1: Components of the curriculum and influences on the process of curriculum design.†Biochem Molec Biol Educ. vol 39, 68-76, 2011

G. Gibbs, in R.Barnett, Ed. Improving the quality of learning through course design, Learning to Effect, SRHE & OUP: Buckingham, pp. 149–165, 1992.

H.B. White “Commentary: Lecturing with stone-age technology.†Biochem Molec Biol Educ. vol 36, p 65, 2008

E.J. Kampmeier,V. Minderhout, R. S. Moog, T. Platt, P. Varma-Nelson, H. B. White “Pedagogies of engagement in science A comparison of PBL, POGIL, and PLTL.†Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ.vol 36, 262–273, 2008

Downloads

Published

2013-10-14

How to Cite

Enzyme Course: Contents, Coverage and Students’ Feedback on Course and Teacher. (2013). Asian Journal of Education and E-Learning, 1(4). https://ajouronline.com/index.php/AJEEL/article/view/420

Similar Articles

21-30 of 43

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.