Traditional Curriculum Theory: Its Place in the Development of Law Units

Authors

  • David Newlyn University of Western Sydney, Australia

Keywords:

Curriculum theory, law, teaching

Abstract

As one of the main concerns of education, this article examines the impact that traditional formal curriculum theory can have on the teaching of law units. An examination of the traditional rational/objective curriculum models espoused by Ralph W Tyler and Hilda Taba is undertaken in the context of their value to legal education. The article concludes with an indication that an understanding of and commitment to use elements associated with formal curriculum theory can assist rigour, credibility, consistency and reliability in the learning activities that are undertaken by the educators of law students.

Author Biography

  • David Newlyn, University of Western Sydney, Australia
    Dr David Newlyn PhD, BEd(Hons) Wgong, LLB Syd is a member of the academic staff in the School of Law at the University of Western Sydney (Australia). He has an extensive history of engagement within the fields of education and law. He teaches and researches in the areas of Business Law, Contract Law, Constitutional Law, Introduction to the Law and Legal Education.

References

S W Su, "The various concepts of curriculum and the factors involved in curricula-making", Journal of Language Teaching and Research, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 153-158, 2012.

F Bobbit, The Curriculum (Boston, Mifflin Co., 1918).

D L Smith & T J Lovat, Curriculum: Action on Reflection (3rd Edition) (Sydney, Social Science Press, 1993).

M Skilbeck, School-Based Curriculum Development (London, Harper and Row, 1984).

C Marsh & K Stafford, Curriculum Practices and Issues (2nd Edition) (Sydney, McGraw-Hill, 1990).

L Stenhouse, An Introduction to Curriculum Research and Development (London, Heinemann, 1978).

M Young, "Overcoming the crisis in curriculum theory: a knowledge-based approach", Journal of Curriculum Studies, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 101-118, 2013.

G A Beauchamp, Curriculum theory (4th Edition) (Itasca, Peacock, 1981).

L Brady, Curriculum Development (3rd Edition) (Sydney, Prentice Hall, 1990).

M Print, Curriculum Development and Design (2nd Edition) (Sydney, Allen and Unwin, 1993)

R W Tyler, Basic Principals of Curriculum and Instruction (Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, 1949).

H Taba, Curriculum Development: Theory and Practice (New York, Harcourt Brace and World, 1962).

D F Walker & J F Soltis, Curriculum and Aims (New York, Teachers College Press, 1986).

G A Beauchamp, "Curriculum Theory: Meaning, Development, and Use", Theory Into Practice, vol. 21,no. 1, pp. 23-37,1982.

Downloads

Published

2016-03-05

How to Cite

Traditional Curriculum Theory: Its Place in the Development of Law Units. (2016). Asian Journal of Education and E-Learning, 4(1). https://ajouronline.com/index.php/AJEEL/article/view/3571

Similar Articles

31-40 of 146

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.