Yield Gap Analysis for Maize-based Landuse System in Central Nepal
Keywords:
Landuse System, CPA, SLM, Quantified production function model, stepwise regression.Abstract
Maize is the main food crop in the hilly areas of Nepal. A Comparative Performance Analysis (CPA) study was undertaken to identify maize yield constraints and quantify their impacts on yield in Makuwanpur District (Central (Nepal). For 68 fields, yield ranged from 200 to 4900 kg/ha with a mean of 2020kg/ha, and a standard deviation of 1120kg/ha. Data on land and management aspects were collected during a field survey. Data acquisition methods included direct measurement/observation of biophysical aspects (recorded on relevee sheet), interviews of land users, visit to a nearby research station and extension offices. The dataset included land and management parameters. The production model identified a terrain unit (Upland plateau & Highland hills versus all others), a management parameter (Quantity of applied urea) and lodging as the three major yield constraints that explained 65% of the encountered yield variability. The impact of each identified constraint on yield (yield-gap of 1928 kg/ha) was 61%, 23 % and 16 %, respectively. Results of this CPA study were in line with the farmers` perception of constraints faced to explain differences between actual and expected yields. CPA was further explored to find significant interactions of urea applied with other land and management aspects to improve the predictive power of the earlier model. Use of specific constraint-management functional relationships enhances the standard CPA method and provides opportunities to identify by constraint specific management requirements. This method could have a wide range of application in the context of diverse agroecosystems and NRM constraints.
References
Brown, S. 1999. Modelling soil nutrient budgets. Journal of soil use and management, Nepal.
De Bie, K. 2000. Comparative Performance Analysis of Agro-Ecosystems. PhD thesis. ITC, The Netherlands.
FAO, 1990. Guidelines for soil description. Third edition (revised), Rome.
Fresco, L.O. 1984. Issues in Farming Systems Research. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science, 32. pp. 253-261.
Hind, M. 1999. Comparison of factors affecting maize yield in relation to land tenure system in Zimbabwe. MSc thesis. ITC, The Netherlands.
Kadayat, K.B. 1997. Maize research working paper. Lumle Agricultural Research Center, Nepal.
Laguna, S.B. 1997. Yield-Gap Analysis for systems with maize, potato and wheat in Bolivia. MSc thesis. ITC, The Netherlands.
Lafitte, H.R. 1994. Identifying Production Problems in Tropical Maize: A Field Guide. Mexico, D.F.: CIMMYT.
Manipon, E.F. 1996. Impact of the environment and management on paddy yield in Thailand. MSc thesis. ITC, The Netherlands.
Moore, S.D. and McCabe, G.P. 1998. Introduction to the practice of statistics. Third edition, W. H. Freeman and Co., New York.
Muleya, Z. 1997. Impacts of production methods and environmental aspects on yield of maize cropping systems in Zimbabwe. MSc thesis. ITC, The Netherlands.
Ngo, T, A. 2000. Assessing spatial constraints leading to maize yield gaps in Zimbabwe. MSc thesis. ITC, The Netherlands.
Olson, K.R. 1986. Use of Multiple Regression Analysis to Estimate Average Corn Yields Using Selected Soils and Climatic Data. Agricultural Systems Journal, 20: 105-120.
Pilbeam, C.J. 1999. Poverty, rural livelihood, and land husbandry in hills environment. In: Proceedings of a conference, Silsoe, UK.
Poudel, D.D. 1995. Diagnostic survey results in Central Nepal. Journal of farming Systems and Research Extension, Nepal.
Regmi, N. 1993. Review of institutions dealing with development policies, planning, and programs in the mountain areas of Nepal. ICIMOD, Nepal.
Rossiter, D.G. 1996. A Theoretical Framework for Land Evaluation. Geoderma, 72, 194-197.
Wakabi, S.M. 1994. Quantified Land Evaluation for Maize Yield-Gap Analysis. PhD thesis. ITC, The Netherlands.
Wakabi, S.M. and Zink, J.A. 1994. Influence of fertilizer application, weeding and insect control on yield and yield-gaps of maize. In: Proceedings of the 15th world congress of soil sciences, Mexico.
Zink, J.A. and Farshad, A. 1995. Issues of Sustainability and Sustainable Land Management (SLM). Canadian Journal of Soil Sciences, 75, Canada.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
- Papers must be submitted on the understanding that they have not been published elsewhere (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, or thesis) and are not currently under consideration by another journal published by any other publisher.
- It is also the authors responsibility to ensure that the articles emanating from a particular source are submitted with the necessary approval.
- The authors warrant that the paper is original and that he/she is the author of the paper, except for material that is clearly identified as to its original source, with permission notices from the copyright owners where required.
- The authors ensure that all the references carefully and they are accurate in the text as well as in the list of references (and vice versa).
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
- The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.
