US and the Lawless Age of ‘War on Terror,’ Contextualizing the Ubiquity of Torture Practices
Keywords:
Torture, Enhanced Interrogation Techniques, Counterterrorism, Terrorism, Human Rights, Human Rights Regimes, International Law, U.S. Foreign PolicyAbstract
Though inarguably condemned in practice, the practice of torture conducted by state entities remains a common narrative in the human rights discourse. Though commonplace worldwide, such practices have been immensely surfaced since the tragic events that took place 11 September 2001, with numerous states such as the US, deliberately normalizing torture as one of the essential means taken to gather counterterrorism-related intelligences. The resurface of enhanced interrogation techniques reflects ambiguities of how this has come to be, despite the conspicuous human rights regimes illegalizing such barbaric practices, and the familiarity of the US echo of civil rights protection globally. Thus such fundamental concerns above raises the question of how the US throughout the years, normalized torture practices under the deliberately constructed lawless age of ‘War on Terror.’ It argues of the purposive assembling of terrorism classification as essentially distinct compared to numerous types of combatants present historically and in the status quo, thus shaping the entitlement of an inhumane status, unbound nor limited from existing International laws. It further argues of the general weaknesses of existing human rights regimes in limiting state practices in the lawless age of terror, reflecting the human rights regime’s inability to exert power and reflecting the prevalence of torture-backed politic
References
Allhoff, Fritz, (2005), ‘A Defense of Torture: Separation of Cases, Ticking Time-Bombs, and Moral Justification,’ International Journal of Applied Philosophy, Vol.19 No.2, pp. 243-264
Bagaric, Mirko, Clarke, Julio, (2005), ‘Not Enough Torture in the World? The Circumstances in Which torture Is Morally Justifiable,’ University of San Francisco Law Review, Vol.39, pp. 265-300
Beck, Ulrich, (2001), The Cosmopolitan State: Towards a Realistic Utopia, Germany: Eurozine
Bronitt, S, (2008), ‘Security and Liberty: Critical Perspectives on Terrorism and Law Reform,’ In (Ed) M. Gani and P. Matthew, Fresh Perspectives on the ‘War on Terror,’ Canmberra: Australian National University E-Press
Burton, Emilie M. Hafner, (2007), ‘Justice Lost! The Failure of International Human Rights Law To Matter Where Needed Most,’ Journal of Peace Research, Vol.44 No.4, pp. 407-425
Bush, George W, (2001), ‘President Bush News Conference: The East Room,’ viewed 03 November 2015, < http://2001-2009.state.gov/coalition/cr/rm/2001/5335.htm>
CAT (Committee Against Torture), (2010), ‘Convention Against torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman, or Degrading Treatment or Punishment: List of Issues Prior to the Fifth Periodic Report of United States of America: CAT/C/USA/5,’ United Nations
Evans, Rebecca, (2007), ‘The Ethics of Torture,’ Human Rights and Human Welfare, Vol. 7, pp. 53-66
Farber, Daniel A, (2005), ‘Unlawful Combatants: Military Detention, Terrorism, and the Rule of Law,’ Current Legal Problems, Vol.58 No.1, pp. 1-24
Federal Anti-Torture Statute, (1994), US Code Title 18 Part 1 Chapter 113C
Choudhury, Ambereen, Klimasinska, Kasia, (2015), ‘Six Yemenis Released From Guantanamo Bay, Sent to Oman’, viewed 2 November 2015 <http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-06-13/u-s-govt-transfers-6-guantanamo-bay-prisoners-to-oman>
Fisher, Max, (2013), A Staggering Map of the 54 Countries that Reportedly Participated in the CIA’s Rendition Program, viewed 29 October 2015, <https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2013/02/05/a-staggering-map-of-the-54-countries-that-reportedly-participated-in-the-cias-rendition-program/>
Gerson, Allan, (2000), ‘Multilateralism A’ La Carte: The Consequences of Unilateral Pick and Pay Approaches,’ Vol.11 No.1, pp. 61-66
Ignatieff, M, (2004), The Lesser Evil: Political Ethics in an Age of Terror, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press
ICCPR (International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights), (1966), ‘United Nations General Assembly resolution 2200A (XXI) of 16 December 1966,’ United Nations
ICRC (International Committee of the Red Cross), (1948), Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War (Fourth Geneva Convention) of 12 August 1949
Jackson, Richard, (2005), ‘Security, Democracy, and the Rhetoric of Counter-Terrorism,’ Democracy and Security, Vol. 1, pp. 147-171
James, Neil, (2007), ‘Torture: What is it, Will it Work, and Can it be Justified?’ In (Ed.) Andrew Lynch, Edwina MacDonald, George Williams, Law and Liberty in the War on Terror, Sydney: The Federation Press
Lantos, Tom, (2001), ‘Preparing for the War on Terrorism,’ viewed 01 November 2015, < http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CHRG-107hhrg77229/html/CHRG-107hhrg77229.htm>
Lokaneeta, Jinee, (2011), Transnational Torture: Law, Violence, and State Power in the United States and India, NY: New York University Press
Manderson, Desmond, (2005), ‘Another Modest Proposal,’ Deakin Law Review, Vol.10 No.2, pp. 640-653
Nowak, Manfred, McArthur, Elizabeth, (2008), The United Nations Convention Against Torture, Oxford: Oxford University Press
OHCHR (Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights), (2015), Ratification of 18 International Human Rights Treaties, viewed 28 October 2015, <http://indicators.ohchr.org/>
Posner, Eric, (2014), ‘The Case Against Human Rights,’ viewed 01 November 2015, <http://www.theguardian.com/news/2014/dec/04/-sp-case-against-human-rights>
Rasmussen, Mikkel Vedby, (2002), ‘A Parallel Globalization of Terror: 9/11 and Globalization,’ Cooperation and Conflict, Vol.37 Issue 3, pp. 323-349
Rumsfeld, Donald H, (2001), ‘September 11, 2001: Attack on America Rumsfeld and Myers Briefing on Enduring Freedom 2:45 p.m. (EDT); October 7, 2001,’ viewed 02 November 2015, < http://avalon.law.yale.edu/sept11/dod_brief22.asp>
Sands, Philippe, (2005), ‘Lawless World? The Bush Administration and Iraq: Issues of international Legality and Criminality,’ Hastings International and Comparative Law Review, Vol.29 No.3, pp. 295-333
UDHR (Universal Declaration of Human Rights), (1948), ‘United Nations General Assembly Resolution 217A (III) of 10 December 1948,’ United Nations
UNGA (United Nations General Assembly), (1984), ‘Declaration on the Protection of All persons from Being Subjected to Torture and Other Cruel, Inhumane or Degrading Treatment or Punishment: A/RES/30/3452,’ United Nations
UNGA (United Nations General Assembly), (2002), ‘Optional Protocol to the Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment: A/RES/199 of 18 December 2002,’ United Nations
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
- Papers must be submitted on the understanding that they have not been published elsewhere (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, or thesis) and are not currently under consideration by another journal published by any other publisher.
- It is also the authors responsibility to ensure that the articles emanating from a particular source are submitted with the necessary approval.
- The authors warrant that the paper is original and that he/she is the author of the paper, except for material that is clearly identified as to its original source, with permission notices from the copyright owners where required.
- The authors ensure that all the references carefully and they are accurate in the text as well as in the list of references (and vice versa).
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
- The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.
