Health, Safety, Security and Environment (HSSE) Perception at the Ferry Port Terminal: A case study at Merak, Banten Province, Indonesia

Authors

  • Haryoto Kusnoputranto School of environmental science
  • Wisata Taruna School of environmental science
  • Suyud Warno Utomo School of environmental science

Keywords:

Ecoseaport, HSSE, Multi Dimensional Scaling

Abstract

Health Safety Security and Environmental (HSSE) concept are commonly used to assess company's operating performance and their supply chain majority at oil and gas industry. However, this concept has largely been underutilized within the ferry port terminal's operation. This study asks whether the HSSE principles can be applied in the ferry port terminal in Indonesia. In particular, it examines whether Ferry port terminal of Merak can be considered as Ecoseaport. The term ‘Ecoseaport' is used instead of 'Ecoport' as commonly apply in European countries. It focuses on major ferry port teminals at inter-island hub because of the increasing volume and movement of people and vehicles in the last five years. This research is in line with the Indonesia government policy on 'Maritime Axis' and is relevant with the cancellation of the Sunda Strait bridge development. Through the multi-dimensional scaling, this research ultimately aims to contribute to the improvement of knowledge of stakeholders that will influence the formulation and implementation of policy and stands appropriately of HSSE aspect. Multi-Dimensional Scaling approach of this research is intended to transform respondents through similarity or their preferences which are represented in constructed a multi-dimensional space variables of Ecoseaport principles through HSSE aspect approached. It was concluded that during Muslim’s feast period with number of motor cycle and vehicle variables were drastically increased than normal operation will affected to HSSE performance. Perception majority of respondent involved parties has put safety and security aspect as the priority. Meanwhile, health cases that reported by port medical officer is the major concerned which need takes attention into port management operation.

 

References

Antara. (2016) .Laporan Arus Balik dan Mudik Lebaran. Jakarta. 2016

Bostjan. P & Franka. C.(2014). Sustainable Port Infractructure, Practical Implementation of The Green Port Concept. Journal: Thermal Science: Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 935-948.

Darbra. R. M, Ronza. A, Stojanovic T.A, Wooldridge C, Casal . J. (2005). A procedure for identifying significant environmental aspects in sea ports. Marine Pollution Bulletin 50(8):866-74

Darbra. R.M, Pittamb. N, Roystona K.A, Darbraa J.P, Journeea. H. (2009). Survey on environmental monitoring requirements of European ports. Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Journal of Environmental Management 90 (2009) 1396-1403.

Darbra. R.M, Ronza. A, Casal, T.A., C. Stojanovic, Wooldridge. C. (2004). The Self Diagnosis Method A new methodology to assess environmental management in sea ports. Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya-Barcelona, Spain. Journal of Marine Pollution Bulletin 48 (2004) 420-42.

Despina. A, Stavros. K, & Mos. S. C. (2011). How Will Greek Ports Become Green Ports. Laboratory of Knowledge and Intelligent Computing (KIC-LAB), Dep. of Informatics and Communications Technology, TEI of Epirus, 47100, Artas, Greece. Geo-Eco-Marina 17.

Directorate General of Land Transportation. (2013). MOC /JICA Report, 1978 – 2012. Jakarta. 2013

Giulia. A & Raimonds. A. (2013). How to Turn an Innovative Concept Into a Success? An Application to Seaport Related Innovation. Journal: Research in Transportation Economics 42. 97-107.

Government - United Nations Partnership for Development Framework (UNPDF). 2016.

Government of the Republic of Indonesia, Ministry of Transportation. 2015. Annual Report. Jakarta.

Jafar. S, & Rezaee. A.H. (2014). A Hybrid Decision-Making Model for selecting Container Seaport in the Persian Gulf. The Asian Journal and shipping and Logistic. Volume 30, Number 1 pp. 075-095.

Mari. D.R & Joaquim. C (2004). Historical Analysis of Accidents in Seaports. Journal:Safety Science Pergamo Safety Science 42.85-98.

Michele, Hilda, & Ines. (2014). Energy management in seaports: A new role for port authorities. Journal: Energy Policy 71, 4-12.

National Institute of Research Development for Marine Geology and Geoecology–GeoEcoMar, Romania. (2012). Environmental Management of Transborder Corridor Ports. Project Ecoport 8. Code SEE/A/218/2.2/X.

Peris. M.E, Orejas. J.M., Subirats. A, Ibanez. S., Alvarez. P. (2005). Development of a system of indicators for sustainable port management. Valencia Polytechnic University, Valencia, Spain. Journal of Marine Pollution Bulletin 50 (2005) 1649-1660.

Rickard. B & Egels. N. (2012). Green Port Dues-The Case of Hinterland Transport. Journal: Research in Transportation Business & Management 5. 85-91.

Stefano. Z, Elvis. B, Boris. M. (2009a). Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of ship generated waste management of Luka Koper. Journal: Waste Management 29, 3036-3046.

Van. T.B, Christian. P, & Chris. W (2008). Good Practice Guide on Port Area Noise Mapping and Management. Port of Amsterdam: Nome Ports.

Downloads

Published

2017-02-15

How to Cite

Kusnoputranto, H., Taruna, W., & Utomo, S. W. (2017). Health, Safety, Security and Environment (HSSE) Perception at the Ferry Port Terminal: A case study at Merak, Banten Province, Indonesia. Asian Journal of Applied Sciences, 5(1). Retrieved from https://ajouronline.com/index.php/AJAS/article/view/4386

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>