Eco-refuges as Anarchistâ€™s Promised Land or the End of Dialectical Anarchism
Keywords:Enlightened anarchism, Land-Ethics, eco-anarchism, eco-refuge, eco-regionalism
Since the early Medieval Time people contested theological legitimation and rational discursive discours on authority as well as retreated to refuges to escape from any secular or ecclesiastical authority. Modern attempts formulated rational legitimation of authority in several ways: pragmatic authority by Monteigne, Bodin and Hobbes, or the contract authority of Locke and Rousseou. However, Enlightened Anarchism, first formulated in 1793 by the English philosopher William Godwin fulminated against all rational restrictions of human freedom and self-determination. However, we do not analyze anarchism by the â€˜whatâ€™ and the â€˜whyâ€™, but by looking for the best actual approach of Anarchistâ€™s â€˜Promised Landâ€™. Furthermore, we follow the footsteps of Thoreauâ€™s Walden Pond experiment considered as a place of salvation and prototype of 19th century romanticâ€™s extreme individualism towards Leopoldâ€™s ethics of the land. Indeed, Thoreauâ€™s and later Muirâ€™s concepts of refuges are tightly connected to territorial and temporal bio-regional constraints and imply an internally organized public area based on mutualism and Hannah Arendtâ€™s agape. From these ideas of refuges, Aldo Leopold formulated his Land-ethics that claimed integrity and autonomy of the â€˜Landâ€™. His foundation is a prototype of the eco-centric free space version of eco-anarchism as formulated by Bookchin.In order to formulate a philosophical foundation of eco-anarchism we reject Newtonian homogeneous space-temporal conception, preceding the whole Modern discours about authority and state. On the contrary, we adopt the pluralistic Leibnizian space-time from which thinking-humans do not dissociate themselves, but participate as part of the rational infrastructure of eco-refuges. In eco-refuges, citizen belong to the civil society that stays in equilibrium with the landscape and all forms of biological life. Space is the boundary condition of human activity and determines how borders, environmental organization and institutes are sustained. Space has its proper essence of sustainability, unity and integrity. The individual feelings of security are embedded in a timelike tradition and evolution of the free space, while individual particular conceptions of space and time integrate into the social processes of identification with the refuge. Therefore, the creation of eco-refuges transforms the actual world of national authorities into a world of anarchistic democratic eco-regional homelands.
Blumenfeld, J., Bottici, Ch., Critchley, S. The Anarchist Turn. Plutopress, New York, 2013.
Windeknecht, R. â€œ Law Without Legitimacy or Justification? The FlawedFoundation of Philosophical Anarchismâ€. Res Publica 18 (2): 173-188, 2002.
Kymlicka, W. Contempory Political Philosophy: An Introduction. Second Edition,University Press Oxford, Oxford (UK), p 62, 2002.
Lucet, A. Spirit and Community: Gustav LandauerÂ´s criticism of materialism and violence. In press in the Conference Proceedings about Enlightened Anarchism, Rovaniemi, Finland, 11-14 September 2014.
GlÃ¼cksmann, A. Cynisme et Passion. Grasset, Paris, 1981.
Hobbes, T. Leviathan (1651). Cambridge University Press. Cambridge (UK), 1988.
Locke, J. Two Treatises of Government. London, Everymanâ€™s Library, 1978.
Hay, P. Main Currents in Western Environmental Thought. Indiana University Press, Indianapolis, 2002.
Althusius, J. Politica Methodice Digesta, 1609,3rd ed. An abridges English edition of the third edition was published as The Politics of Johannes Althusius, edited by Frederick S. Carney, London: Eyre and Spottis woode, 1965, Politica, Indianapolis Liberty Fund, 1995.
Woldring, H. E. S. Kernbegrippen in de Politieke Filosofie: een herwaardering, Bussum, p. 53-6 Coutinho, 2001.
Evanoff, R. Bioregionalism and Global Ethics: A Transactional Approach to Achieving Ecological Sustainability, Social Justice and Human Well-being. Routledge, London, 2010.
Taylor, Ch. Modern Social Imaginary. Duke University Press, Durham, and London, U.K, 2004.
Strasser, S. De Burger voorbij: ethische politieke overwegingen, Ambo, Baarn, 1981.
Evanoff, R. Bioregionalism and Global Ethics: A Transactional Approach to Achieving Ecological Sustainability, Social Justice and Human Well-being, chapter 1, 2010.
Muir, J. Our National Parks, AMS Press, New York, 1970.
Leopold, A . A Sand County Almanac. Oxford University Press, New York, p.224-5, 1949.
Baird Callicott, J. â€œToward a global environmental ethicâ€. In Worldviews and ecology: Religion, philosophy, and the environment, ed. Mary Evelyn Tucker and John A. Grim: 30-8, Maryknoll: Orbis, 1994.
Baird Callicott, J. Earthâ€™s insights: A multicultural survey of ecological ethics from the Mediterranean basis to the Australian outback. Berkeley:University of California Press, 1994.
Norton, Bryan G. â€œWhy I am not a nonanthropocentrist: Callicott and the failure of monistic inherentismâ€. Environmental Ethics 17: 341-58, 1995.
Bookchin, M.Post-scarcity anarchism. 3rd ed. MontrÃ©al:Black Rose, 2004.
Sale, K. â€œAnarchy and ecology: A review essayâ€. Social Anarchism 10: 14-23, 1985.
Bookchin, M. â€œWhat is communalism?: The democratic dimension of anarchismâ€. Green Perspectives 31: 1-6, 1994.
Sale, K. Dwellers in the land: The Bioregional vision. 2nd ed. Athens: University of Georgia Press, 2000.
McClaughry, J. The Institute of Liberty and Community. A working paper circulated by the New England Committee of Correspondence (Greens/Green Party USA, 1984.
Sale, K. Dwellers in the land: The Bioregional vision.2nd ed. p.55 Athens: University of Georgia Press, 2000.
Sale, K. Dwellers in the land: The Bioregional vision.2nd ed. p.57Athens: University of Georgia Press, 2000.
Dodge, Jim. â€œLiving by life: Some bioregional theory and practiceâ€. In Debating the earth: The environmental politics reader. 2nd ed., ed John S. Dryzek and David Schlosberg: 355-63: Oxford University Press, 2005.
Alexander, D. â€œBioregionalism: Science or Sensibility?â€ Environmental Ethics 12:161-73, 1990.
Holland, A., Oâ€™Neill, J. â€œThe integrity of nature: Organization of space in an inhabited cosmosâ€. Nature and Culture 1: 1-9, 1996.
Verstraeten, G. J. M., Verstraeten W. W. â€œFrom Particular Times and Spaces to Metaphysics of LeopoldÂ´s Ethics of the Landâ€. Asian Journal of Humanities and Social Studies (ISSN: 2321 â€“ 2799) Volume 02â€“ Issue 01, February 2014.
Seamon, D., â€œThe Phenomenological Contribution to Environmental Psychologyâ€, Journal of Environmental Psychology, vol. 2, pp. 119-40, 1982.
Norberg-Schulz, C., Genius Loci: towards a phenomenology of Architecture, Rizzoli, New York, 1980.
Relph, E. Place and Placelessness, Pion, London, 1976.
Cheney, J. â€œPostmodern Environmental Ethics: Ethics as Bioregional Narrativeâ€, Environmental Ethics, vol. 11, pp. 117-35, 1989.
Jacobs, M. Sustainability and Socialism, Socialist and Resources Association, London 1995.
Arendt, H. The Promise of Politics. ( New York, Schocken Books, p.94 ,2005.
Fox,W. Toward Transpersonal Ecology: Developing New Foundations for Instrumentalism, Shambhala publications, Boston, Massachusetts, 1990.
Gadamer, H. G., Philosophical Hermeneutics, (translated by David E. Linge), University of California Press, 1977.
Gadamer, H. G., Truth and Method, Sheed and Ward, Ltd Press, London, 1975.
Lefebvre, H. Critique of everyday Life. Verso, 2002.
Jones, A. â€œ German Autonomie as a Ruptured Urban Space: Henri Lefebvre and The Autonomous Philosophy of Contradictionâ€. To be published in the Conference Proceedings about Enlightened Anarchism, Rovaniemi, Finland, 11-14 September 2014.
Bookchin, M. Social ecology and communalism, ed. Eirik Eiglad. Oakland: AK Press, 2007.
Verstraeten, G. J. M., Verstraeten W. W. Mijn Thuisplek. Landethiek over geborgenheid en dreiging van ruimte-tijd en diversiteit. Damon, Budel, chapter 10, 2010.
Evanoff, R. Bioregionalism and Global Ethics: A Transactional Approach to Achieving Ecological Sustainability, Social Justice and Human Well-being.chapter 14. Routledge, London, 2010.
Chartier, Ch. In defense of the Anarchist. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 29: 115-138, 2009.
Carter, A.. â€œAnarchism, some theoretical foundationsâ€. Journal of political ideology.16 (3) 245 264, 2011.
Huntington, S. P. Clash of Civilizations and the Remake of World Order, Simon & Schluster, New York, 1996.
How to Cite
- Papers must be submitted on the understanding that they have not been published elsewhere (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, or thesis) and are not currently under consideration by another journal published by any other publisher.
- It is also the authors responsibility to ensure that the articles emanating from a particular source are submitted with the necessary approval.
- The authors warrant that the paper is original and that he/she is the author of the paper, except for material that is clearly identified as to its original source, with permission notices from the copyright owners where required.
- The authors ensure that all the references carefully and they are accurate in the text as well as in the list of references (and vice versa).
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
- The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.