Towards an Immanent Business Ethics?
Keywords:
immanent ethics, power, affirmative practice, Deleuze, NietzscheAbstract
The aim of this paper is to explore the possibilities for an immanent ethics for business. The paper has three parts. In the first part, I make some general and critical comments about the nature of business ethics. In the second part, I outline the immanent ethics as presented by the French philosopher Gilles Deleuze. Then, I positioning immanent ethics within business, primarily in relation to the terms "best practice" and "best fit." The main claim here is that an immanent ethics encourages a shift from a merely reactive approach toward an active. This shift opens up the field for an affirmative practice that aims at enlarging the discussion within business ethics as suchReferences
• Carroll, A. B. (1979). A Three-dimensional Model of Corporate Social Performance. Academy Management Review, 4: 497–505.
• Carroll, A. B. (1991). The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders. Business Horizons, July–August: 38–48.
• Chia, R. (1999). A ‘Rhizomic’ Model of Organizational Change and Transformation: Perspective from a Metaphysics of Change. British Journal of Management, Vol. 10, 209–227.
• Collins, J. W. (1994). Is Business Ethics an Oxymoron? Business Horizons, Sept.–Oct: 1–8.
• Baumeister, R. F, K. D. Vohs, J. L. Aaker, & E. Garbinsky (2013). Some Key Differences between a Happy Life and a Meaningful Life. Journal of Positive Psychology, Vol. 8, Issue 6.
• Boxall, P. & J. Purcell (2011). Strategy and Human Resource Management (third edition). Palgrave Macmillan.
• David, S. A., I. Boniwell, A. C. Ayers (2013). The Oxford Handbook of Happiness. Oxford University Press.
• Deci, E.L. & R. M. Ryan (2002). Handbook of Self-Determination Research. The University of Rochester Press.
• Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and Repetition. Translated by Paul Patton. Columbia University Press.
• Deleuze, G. (2002). Bergsonism. Translated by H. Tomlinson and B. Habberjam. Zone Books.
• Deleuze, G. (1995). Negotiations. Translated by M. Joughin. Columbia University Press.
• Deleuze, G. (2002). Nietzsche and Philosophy. Trans. by H. Tomlinson. Continuum.
• Deleuze, G. (2005). Pure Immanence: Essays on a Life. Translated by A. Boyman. Zone Books.
• Deleuze, G. & F. Guattari (2000). Anti-Oedipus. Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Trans. By R. Hurley, M. Seem, & H. R. Lane. The Athlone Press.
• Deleuze, G. & F. Guattari (1994). What Is Philosophy? Trans. by H. Tomlinson and G. Burchell. Columbia University Press.
• Donaldson, T. & L. E. Preston (1995). The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications. Academy of Management Review, 20 (1): 65–91.
• Hardt, M. & T. Negri (2001). Empire. Harvard University Press.
• Horrigan, B. (2010). Corporate Social Responsibility in the 21st Century. Edward Elgar Publishing.
• Loe, T. W., L. Ferrel, & P. Mansfield (2000). A Review of Empirical Studies Assessing Ethical Decision Making in Business. Journal of Business Ethics, 25 (3): 183–204.
• Mackie, J. L. (1990). Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong. Penguin Books.
• May, T. (1995). Gilles Deleuze. An introduction. Cambridge University Press.
• Moore, G.E. (2013). Ethics. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.
• Mullarkey, J. (2007). Post-Continental Philosophy. Continuum.
• Nietzsche, F. (1973). Will to power. Trans. By W. Kaufmann and R. J. Hollingdale. Random House.
• Nietzsche, F. (1974). The Gay Science. Translated by W. Kaufman. Vintage.
• Nietzsche, F. (2010). Moralens oprindelse. Trans. to Danish by N. Henningsen. Det lille forlag.
• Pousset, J. (Forthcoming). Reanimating Corporate Governance with Intrinsic Motivation and Tolerance for Diversity. In Journal of Global Good Governance, Ethics and Leadership.
• Rorty, R. (2005). Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton University Press.
• Serres, M. (1997). The Troubadour of Knowledge. Translated by S. F. Glaser with W. Paulson. The University of Michigan Press.
• Smith, D. W. (2011). Deleuze and the Question of Desire: Towards an Immanent Theory Ethics. In Deleuze and Ethics, edited by D. W. Smith and N. Jun. Edinburgh University Press.
• Treviño, L. K. & K. A. Nelsen (2007). Managing Business Ethics: Straight Talk about How to Do It Right (4th ed.). Wiley.
• Tsoukas, H. & Chia, R. (2002). On Organizational Becoming: Rethinking Organizational Change. Organization Science, Vol. 13, No. 5, September–October.
• Wittgenstein, L. (2009). Philosophical Investigations. Trans. by G. E. M. Anscobe, P. M .S. Hacker, & J. Schutle. Wiley-Blackwell.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
- Papers must be submitted on the understanding that they have not been published elsewhere (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, or thesis) and are not currently under consideration by another journal published by any other publisher.
- It is also the authors responsibility to ensure that the articles emanating from a particular source are submitted with the necessary approval.
- The authors warrant that the paper is original and that he/she is the author of the paper, except for material that is clearly identified as to its original source, with permission notices from the copyright owners where required.
- The authors ensure that all the references carefully and they are accurate in the text as well as in the list of references (and vice versa).
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
- The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.
