Measuring Empowerment between Working and Non-working Women: Malaysian Perspective

Authors

  • A.M. Sultana Department of Social and Citizenship Studies, Faculty of Human Sciences, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris (UPSI)
  • Norhafiza Mohd Hed Department of Social and Citizenship Studies, Faculty of Human Sciences, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris (UPSI), 35900 Tanjong Malim, Perak
  • Fauziah Che Leh Department of Geography & Environment, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris (UPSI), 35900 Tanjong Malim, Perak

Keywords:

Empowerment, decision making, working women, non-working women, personal affairs, children's affairs

Abstract

The main aim of this study is to measure empowerment between working and non-working women in their families by considering their decision making power as the level of empowerment. The study was conducted in one of the districts of Gombak in Malaysia. Three residential areas and three academic institutions were selected as the sub-study areas of Gombak district. The respondents of the study consisted of 132 (66 working & 66 non-working) women from the selected study areas. The first objective of this study was to examine decision-making power between working and non-working women on the aspects of personal and children affairs. The results revealed that working women enjoyed greater power and freedom compared to non-working women on the above aspects. The study also investigated the overall assessment of the level of decision-making power between working and non-working women and the results revealed that the majority of the respondents of the working group had ‘high’ and ‘moderate’ level of decision-making whereas only a few respondents from non-working group had such levels of decision-making power. The article concluded that working women were more empowered compared to non-working women. Finally, the study suggests that interventions are necessary especially for non-working women who enjoy less freedom and exercise less power in family decision-making. These interventions refer to increasing education and income opportunity for women that might increase their decision-making power as well as their empowerment.

 

References

C. Safilios-Rothschild,â€Female power, autonomy and demographic change in the third worldâ€, In Anker R, Mbuvinic and Nadia H. Youssef (Eds.) Women’s Role And Population Trend in the Third World, London: Croom Helm, 1983.

H. L Davis, “Decision making within the householdâ€. Journal Of Consumer Research, 2 : 241-260, 1976.

H., Kassarjian,. Consumer Psychology. Annual Review of Psychology. 33: 619-649.http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev.ps.33.020182.003155. 1982.

P. Corfman, Kim and R.L. Donald, “Models of Cooperative Group Decision-Making and Relative influence: An Experimental Investigation of Family Purchase Decisionsâ€. Journal of Consumer Research. 14:1-13. 1987

A M Sultana, A M. “Socio-cultural dimension of women discrimination in rural communitiesâ€. Ozean Journal of Social Sciences, 3 (1): 31-38.2010

Department Of Statistics Malaysia (2013). Oil& Gas Industry Report.

Z Oxaal, & S Baden, “Gender and Empowerment: Definitions, Approaches and Implications for Policyâ€, Briefing Prepared For the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency. 1997.

N. Kabeer. “Resources, Agency, Achievements: Reflections on The measurement of Women’s Empowermentâ€. Development and Change, 30, Pp 435-464., 1999.

M.H Marchand. & J.L. Parpart). Feminism: Postmodernism Development. Routledge, London, 1995.

C.O.N Moser, “Gender Planning and Development: Theory, Practice and Trainingâ€. Routledge, London. 1993.

K. Young. Planning Development with Women: Making a World of Difference. Macmillan, London. 1993.

S. Batliwala, “Education for Women’s Empowermentâ€, ASPBAE Position Paper for the Fourth World Conference on Women, Beijing, New Delhi, Asia-South Pacific Bureau of Adult Education. 1995.

J. Friedmann, “Empowerment: The Politics of Alternative Developmentâ€. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, UK. 1992.

N., Ngome, Angella, “Gender Division of Labour and Women’s Decision-Making Power in Rural Households: The Case of Mbalangi, Ediki and Mabonji Villages of Meme Divisionâ€, Unpublished Master’s Thesis, University of Buea, Department of Women and Gender Studies. 2003.

R. T., Green, I. C. M Cunningham, “Feminine Role Perception and Family Purchasing Decisionsâ€. Journal of Marketing Research 12, 325-332, 1975.

T. Elizabeth, & Duncan, Measuring Power. Chapter 4. Household Decisions: Gender and Development. Research Report published by International Food Policy Research Institute, 2003.

T. Green, Robert and C.M Isabella. Cunningham, "Feminine Role Perception and Family Purchasing Decisions," Journal of Marketing Research, 12 (August), 325-332, 1975.

M. A Belch and A. W., “Laura. Family decision at the turn of the century: Has the changing structure of households impacted the family decision-making process?†Journal of Consumer Behaviour 2 (2), 111-24. 2002

C. K Lee, S. E., Beatty. “Family structure and influence in family decision makingâ€. Journal of Consumer Marketing 19 (1), 24-41, 2002

David, J.B., 2006. “Husband-wife innovative consumer decision making: Exploring the effect of family powerâ€. Psychology and Marketing. 9(3) DOI: 10.1002/mar.4220090302.

Mahmuda H and Yoshihito I. “Women Empowerment through Participation in Micro-Credit Programme: A Case Study from Bangladesh†Journal of Social Sciences 5(3): 244-250, 2009

Sultana A.M. “Factors Effect on Women Autonomy and Decision-Making Power within the Household in Rural Communities†Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 7(1): 18-22, 2011

Downloads

Published

2013-12-21

How to Cite

Sultana, A., Hed, N. M., & Leh, F. C. (2013). Measuring Empowerment between Working and Non-working Women: Malaysian Perspective. Asian Journal of Humanities and Social Studies, 1(5). Retrieved from https://ajouronline.com/index.php/AJHSS/article/view/711