A Comparison of International Faculty Members’ Perceptions of Shared Governance

Michael T Miller, Mei-Yan Lu, Daniel P. Nadler

Abstract


Shared governance has multiple dimensions of implementation in higher education, ranging from stakeholder input through trustee involvement to students and staff holding positions of representative power to have input into decision making. It has historically been a hallmark of higher education. The current study was developed to extend the Miller and Lu findings and specifically examining mainland Chinese faculty who are resident faculty in their homeland. The findings can have significant impact on understanding the global academy and how faculty perceive their role in higher education.


Keywords


higher education, faculty governance, faculty role

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bowen, W. G., & Tobin, E. M. (2015). Locus of Authority: The Evolution of Faculty Roles in the Governance of Higher Education. Princeton University Press.

Evans, J. P. (1999). Benefits and barriers to shared governance. In M. T. Miller (ed.), Responsive Academic Decision Making, Involving Faculty in Higher Education Governance (pp. 29-54). Stillwater, OK: New Forums.

Gibb, A., Haskins, G., & Robertson, I. (2013). Leading the entrepreneurial university: Meeting the entrepreneurial development needs of higher education institutions. In Universities in Change (pp. 9-45). Springer New York.

Helms, R. M., & Price, T. (2005). Who needs a faculty senate? Academe, 91(6), 34-36.

Hendrickson, R. M., Lane, J. E., Harris, J. T., & Dorman, R. H. (2013). Academic leadership and governance of higher education. Sterling, VA: Stylus.

Mamiseishvili, K., & Rosser, V. (2009). International and citizen faculty in the United States: An examination of their productivity at research universities. Research in Higher Education, 51(1), 1-20.

Melear, K. B. (2013). The role of internal governance, committees, and advisory groups. In P. J. Schloss and K. M. Cragg (eds.), Organization and Administration of Higher Education (pp. 50-65). New York, NY: Routledge.

Miller, M. T. (2003). Improving faculty governance, cultivating leadership and collaboration in decision making. Stillwater, OK: New Forums.

Miller, M. T., & Lu, M. Y. (2005, February). Comparison of historically non-democratic nationality faculty in democratic decision-making in US higher education institutions. Research paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Cross Cultural Research, Santa Fe, New Mexico.

Pepper, R. E., Chasteen, S. V., Pollock, S. J., Perkins, K. K., Rebello, N. S., Engelhardt, P. V., & Singh, C. (2012, February). Facilitating faculty conversations: Development of consensus learning goals. In AIP Conference Proceedings-American Institute of Physics (Vol. 1413, No. 1, p. 291).

Rosser, V. J. (2003). Historical overview of faculty governance in higher education. In M. T. Miller and J. Caplow (eds.), Policy and University Faculty Governance (pp. 3 – 18). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.

Schick, E. B. (2014). Shared Visions of Public Higher Education Governance: Structures and Leadership Styles That Work.

Schoorman, D., & Acker-Hocevar, M. (2010). Viewing faculty governance within a social justice framework: Struggles and possibilities for democratic decision-making in higher education. Equity & Excellence in Education, 43(3), 310-325.

Stensaker, B., & Vabø, A. (2013). Re‐inventing shared governance: Implications for organisational culture and institutional leadership. Higher Education Quarterly, 67(3), 256-274.

Taylor, S. L. (Ed.). (2011). 30-second politics. New York, NY: Metro Books.

Weissberg, R. (1998). Democracy and the academy. Policy Studies Review, 15(4), 1-3.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c)