Influence of Emerging Economic Interests on Management of Resource Access in Awoja Watershed


  • Charles Aben Makerere University, Kampala
  • John James Okiror Makerere University
  • Jacob Godfrey Agea Makerere University, Kampala



Economic Interests, Watershed MAnagement, Climate Change


This study presents the contextual circumstances that define access in Awoja watershed, particularly the constellations of means, relations, and processes that enable various actors to derive benefits from resources in the Watershed. The objective of the study was to identify the influence of emerging economic interests on managing the access to resources in the watershed, thereby linking resource exploitation to watershed degradation. The study was carried out in Soroti, Katakwi and Amuria the hot spots of draughts and floods and the increasing degradation in Awoja. A cross sectional study design using both qualitative and quantitative data collection methods was employed. Factor Analysis and a Logistics Regression Model were used to analyze household survey data gathered from 180 randomly selected households. Focus Group Discussions and key informants’ interviews were also used to generate qualitative data used to explain relationships among variables and to analyze local perceptions on the relationships.

From the factor analysis seven factors were perceived to have been linked to management of access to watershed resources of which four factors were significantly correlated: Increasing interests in watershed resources (r=0.425 P<0.001), stakeholder conflicts of interests (r=0.379 P<0.01), changes in economic trends in the watershed (r=0.482 P<0,001), and household wealth status (r=0.253 P<0.01). From the Logistical Regression results, increasing interests in the wetlands had significant negative influence on control of access to watershed resources.While changes in household needs, household wealth status and civil society interests in the watershed had increasing influence on watershed management the rest of the factors had a decreasing influence on watershed management.

From focus group discussions and Key Informants Interviews revealed that commoditization rice and charcoal, fuzzy environmental protection rules and elite capture by watershed management institutions were some of the main emerging practices linked escalating degradation in Awoja. Dye to the increasing economic interests by communities and local leaders in Awoja watershed resources, reducing both degradation and marginalization of within the watershed can only be possible if a diversification program with alternative livelihoods are introduced within the watershed.

Author Biographies

Charles Aben, Makerere University, Kampala

Crop Development Specialist, NAADS Secretariat Kampala

John James Okiror, Makerere University

Lecturer College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, Makerere University

Jacob Godfrey Agea, Makerere University, Kampala

Lecturer College of Agriculture


• Adger, N. W., Benjaminsen, A. T., Brown, K. and Svarstad, H. (2001). Advanced Political Ecology of Global Environmental Discourses, Development and Change. 32: 681-715.

• Akello,S.,Turyahabwe, N., Okullo, P., & Agea, J.G. (2016).Changes in Land use/cover change and perceived status of Awoja in eastern Uganda. African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology.Vol. 10(11), pp. 406-414

• Amin, M.E. (2005). Social Science Research: Conception Methodology and Analysis. Kampala: Makerere University Printeryafd

• Agrawal, GK (2001) Paper prepared for the Social Dimensions of Climate Change, Social Development Department, The World Bank, Washington DC, March 5-6, 2008.

• Brandsen T and Pestoff V (2006).Co-production, the third sector and the delivery of public services.Public management Review vol. 8, pp 493-501.

• Ffolliott, E (2002).Consistent geographical patterns of changes in high-impact European heatwaves. Nature Geosci.3, 398–403 (2010).

• IPCC, 2007a. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland. Available at: / htmls

• IPCC, 2007b. Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Working Group II Contribution to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fourth Assessment Report.Summary for Policy Makers.IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland.

• 23. Lund, J. F. and Treue, T. (2008). Are We Getting There?, Evidence of Decentralized Forest Management from the Tanzanian Miombo Woodlands. World Development 36(12): 2780-2800.

• Keeley, J. I. Scoones (2000). Knowledge, power and politics: the environmental policy-making process in Ethiopia. The Journal of Modern African Studies 38(1): 89-120.

• Kaltenborn, R. (2010). Watershed Condition Classification Technical Guide; United States, Department of Agriculture Forest Service FS-978

• Gordon T and Logan, B. (2004). Ideology and power in resource management. In W. Moseley and B.I. Logan (eds.). African environment and development: rhetoric, programs, realities. Aldershot, Burlington, VT: Ashgate.

• Mugende, O.M & Mugenda, A.G. M (1999).Research Methods. Nairobi: African Center for technology Studies Press.

• National Environmental Management Authority [NEMA]. (2004).An annual Environmental protection Review; Kampala-Uganda.

• National Environmental Management Authority [NEMA], (2000).An annual Environmental protection Review; Kampala-Uganda.

• Peterson, T. C., Willett, K. M.&Thorne, P. W.Observed changes in surface atmospheric energy over land. Geophys. Res. Lett.38 (2011).

• Ribot, J. C., Lund, J. F. and Treue, T. (2010). Democratic Decentralization in sub-Saharan Africa: Its Contribution to Forest Management, Livelihoods, and Enfranchisement. Environmental Conservation 37 (1): 35–44.

• Rotberg, Robert I. and Theodore K. Rabb, editors. (1981). Climate and History: Studies in Interdisciplinary History. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

• Robbins, P. (2012). Political ecology: a critical introduction. Second edition. Oxford: Blackwell.

• Shanee, N. (2013).Campesino justification for self-initiated conservation actions: a challenge to mainstream conservation. Journal of Political Ecology 20: 413-428.

• Roder, S 2002. Watershed Development Adaptation Strategy for Climate Change. Paper presented in South Asia expert workshop on Adaptation to Climate Change for Agricultural Productivity, organized by the Government of India, UNEP and CGIAR, New Delhi.

• Uganda Bureau of Statistics (UBOS-2002).National population statistical abstract; Kamapala, Uganda.

• Steinmann, S. (2008). Pastrolism and intensification: changing environmental resource use in Morocco. Yale Forestry and Environment Bulletin 103: 81-107.

• Swallow S K. Bodén, Å. Hallgren & H. Witt Hedström (2006) Effects of Three Different Maneuvers Analyzed, Acta Radiologica, 47:7, 628-633

• Sherwood, S. C.&Huber, M.An adaptability limit to climate change due to heat stress. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA107, 9552–9555 (2010).

• Sharma, RSherwood, S. C.&Huber, M. (2005) An adaptability limit to climate change due to heat stress. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA107, 9552–9555.

• Tennyson, L. and Zingari, C. (2006). (ed.) International Watershed Management Conference on Water Resources for the Future, Porto Cervo, Sassari (Italy), 22-24 Oct 2003/ FAO, Rome (Italy). Forest Resources Div.

• Wani S.P., Sreedevi, T.K., Reddy, T., Venkateswarlu, B., & Prasad, C.S. (2006). Community watershed for improved livelihoods through consortium approach in drought prone rain-fed areas. Journal of hydrological Research and development.3:55-77




How to Cite

Aben, C., Okiror, J. J., & Agea, J. G. (2018). Influence of Emerging Economic Interests on Management of Resource Access in Awoja Watershed. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences, 6(5).