Breeding Practices and Farmers Trait Preferences on Indigenous Dairy Cattle Production in East Gojjam Zone, Ethiopia
Keywords:
breeding practice, selection criteria, indigenous cattleAbstract
This study was carried out to evaluate the indigenous cattle breeding activities and farmers’ trait preferences on indigenous dairy cows in Hulet Eju Enese, Enebsie Sar Midir and Aneded districts within East Gojjam Zone under smallholder farmers management system. For the study, a cross-sectional survey and structured questionnaire as well as focus group discussions were used to collect data from 225 households. The data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS Version 20) to study the magnitude and direction of variation. Uncontrolled natural mating was a common mating system accounting 82%, 87.3%, 73.3% in Hulet Eju Enese, Enebsie Sar Midir and Aneded districts, respectively. The first breeding objective of the farmers in Enebsie Sar Midir district was obtaining better milk yield 45.4%, however attaining strong draft oxen 42.7% was more preferred in both Hulet Eju Enese and Aneded districts. Trait preference ranking indices showed that communities prefer cattle for its higher milk yield with the indices of 0.16, 0.37, 0.22, faster growth rate 0.11, 0.09, 0.11, adaptability to local environment (shortage of feed resources and prevalence of disease) 0.10, 0.07, 0.08, breeding ability 0.14, 0.13, 0.09 and providing traction power 0.22, 0.19, 0.35 in Hulet Eju Enese, Enebsie Sar Midir and Aneded districts, respectively. Farmers' cattle trait preferences slightly differ across districts. Overall, milk yield and draught power were the most important production objectives. Among the selection criteria of farmers for indigenous dairy cows, udder and teat size, and pelvic width were commonly considered as primary important and in addition traction power, breeding ability and tolerant to seasonal feed shortage and disease for male selection. Productivity of cattle is limited by several constraints that include natural uncontrolled and unorganized breeding practice, high prevalence of diseases, poor reproductive performance, limited feed availability and poor marketing system and lack of recording system in the study area.
References
• Abeygunawardena H and Dematewewa C M B. 2004. Pre-pubertal and postpartum anestrus in tropical Zebu cattle. Animal Reproduction Science 82–83 (2004) pp 373–387.
• Alewya Heyredin 2014. Comparative Study of Reproductive and Productive Performance of Holstein Friesian Dairy Cows at Holetta Bull Dam Station and Genesis Farms, a Thesis Submitted to the College of Veterinary Medicine and Agriculture of Addis Ababa University, Bishoftu, Ethiopia.
• Ayantu M, Haile A, Dessie T and Mekasha Y 2012. On farm characterization of Horro cattle breed production systems in western Oromia, Ethiopia. Livestock Research for Development 24 (100). Retrieve June 25, 2015 from http.//www.lrrd.org/lrrd24/6/meko24100.htm.
• Azage T, Berhanu G, Hoekstra D 2010. Livestock input supply and service provision in Ethiopia: Challenges and opportunities for market oriented development. IPMS (Improving Productivity and Market Success) of Ethiopian Farmers Project Working Paper 20. ILRI (International Livestock Research Institute), Nairobi, Kenya p. 48.
• Azage T, Tesfaye M, Tesfaye D, Worku T, Eshete D 2009. Transhumance cattle production system in North Gondar, Amhara Region, Ethiopia: Is it sustainable? IPMS (Improving Productivity and Market Success) of Ethiopian Farmers Project. Working Paper No. 14. ILRI (International Livestock Research Institute), Nairobi, Kenya p. 73.
• Azage Tegegne, Tsehay Reda, Alemu Gebrewold and Hizkias Ketema, 2000. Milk Recording and Herd Registration in Ethiopia In: Pastoralism and Agropastoralism: Which way forward? Proceedings for the 8th annual conference of the Ethiopian Society of Animal Production. (ESAP) held in Addis Ababa, 24-26 August 2000, Addis Ababa. P 90.
• CSA, (Central Statistics Authority), 2007. Statistics Report on Farm Management Practices, Livestock and Farm implements. Part II, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
• DAGRIS (The Domestic Animal Genetic Resources System), 2007. In http://dagris.ilri.cgiar.org/distlist.asp?SC=1&GC=&BN=&RC=&SRC=&CC=70.
• Dereje Bekele. 2015. On Farm Phenotypic Characterization of Indigenous Cattle and Their Production Systems in Bako Tibe and Gobu Sayo Districts of Oromia Region, Ethiopia.M.Sc Thesis. Haramaya University, Haramaya.
• IBC (Institute of Biodiversity Conservation), 2004. The State of Ethiopia's Farm Animal Genetic Resources: Country Report, A contribution to the first report on the State of the World's Animal Genetic Resources, May 2004, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
• Kahi AK, Nitter G, Thorpe W, Gall CF 2000. Crossbreeding for dairy production in the lowland tropics of Kenya-Prediction of performance of alternative crossbreeding strategies. Livestock Production Science 63, 55-63.
• Masama E, NT Kusina, S Sibanda and C Majoni 2003. Reproductive and lactational performance of cattle in a smallholder dairy system in Zimbabwe. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 35: 117-129.
• Misganu Amanuel 2016. Review on Production and Reproductive Performance of Cross Breed Dairy Cattle in Ethiopia. A Seminar Submitted to Jima University College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Department of Animal Science, Seminar (Anbg516).
• Mwambene PL, Katule AM, Chenyambuga SW, Mwakilembe PAA 2012. Fipa cattle in the south western highlands of Tanzania: desired attributes, breeding practices and productive performance. Animal Genetic Resources 51: 45-56.
• Piotr G, Krzysztof M, Zygmunt H and Ewa D. 2004. Heritability’s of and genetic and phenotypic correlationsbetween condition score and production and conformation traits in Black-and-White cows. p89.
• Roessler R, Drucker A G, Scarpa R, Markemann A, Lemke U, Thuy LT and Valle Zárate A. 2008. Using choice experiments to assess smallholder farmers' preferences for pigbreeding traits in different production systems in North–West Vietnam. Ecological Economics 66(1):184-192.
• Rowlands J, Nieves C, Hanotte O, Workneh A (2006). Cattle breed distributions across districts as determined from cluster analysis of phenotypic data collected in the Oromiya region, Ethiopia. In 8th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, August 13-18, 2006, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil
• Scarpa R, Drucker A G, Anderson S, Ferraes-Ehuan N, Gómez V, Risopatrón C R and Rubio-Leonel O 2003. Valuing genetic resources in peasant economies: the case of 'hairless' Creole pigs in Yucatan. Ecological Economics, 45: 427-443.
• Shiferaw Garoma, 2006. In-situ Phenotypic Characterization of kereyu cattle type in Fentale district of oromia Region, Ethiopia. M.Sc. Thesis, school of Graduate Studies Haramaya University, Ethiopia.
• SPSS (Statistical Procedures for Social Sciences) 2001. SPSS User’s guide version 20.0. SPSS Institute Inc., Cary NC.
• Takele Taye, 2005. On-farm phenotypic characterization of Sheko breed of cattle and their habitat in Bench Maji Zone, Ethiopia. MSc Thesis, Alemaya University, Ethiopia. Pp105
• Tesfa Gebremicheal, 2009. Reproductive performance of indigenous dairy cattle in south Wollo. MSc Thesis, Mekelle University, Ethiopia. 65p.
• Workneh A, Ephrem G, Markos T, Yetnayet M, Rege JEO 2004. Current State of Knowledge on Characterization of Farm Animal Genetic Resources in Ethiopia. In: Proceedings of the 11th Annual conference of the Ethiopian Society of Animal Production (ESAP) held in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, August 28-30, 2003. pp. 1-21.
• Yilma Z, Emannuelle GB and Ameha S 2011. A Review of the Ethiopian Dairy Sector. Ed. Rudolf Fombad,Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Sub Regional Office for Eastern Africa (FAO/SFE), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 81P.
• Zewdu Wuletaw, 2004. Indigenous cattle genetic resources, their husbandry practices and breeding objectives in North-western Ethiopia. MSc Thesis, Alemaya University, Ethiopia. Pp1
• Zewdu Wuletaw, Workneh Ayalew and Sölkner J 2006. Breeding Scheme Based on Analysis of Community Breeding Objectives for Cattle in North-western Ethiopia Ethiopian Journal of Animal Production 6(2): 53-66p.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
- Papers must be submitted on the understanding that they have not been published elsewhere (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, or thesis) and are not currently under consideration by another journal published by any other publisher.
- It is also the authors responsibility to ensure that the articles emanating from a particular source are submitted with the necessary approval.
- The authors warrant that the paper is original and that he/she is the author of the paper, except for material that is clearly identified as to its original source, with permission notices from the copyright owners where required.
- The authors ensure that all the references carefully and they are accurate in the text as well as in the list of references (and vice versa).
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
- The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.
