Challenges of a Global Sociology: Centers and Peripheries in Geopolitics of Sociological Theory

Authors

  • Ladan Rahbari PhD Candidate in Sociology and lecturer at the Isfahan University of art
  • Fernando Perlatto

Keywords:

center, global sociology, periphery, post-national, theory

Abstract

Debate about the possibility of building a global sociology has gained increasing importance in recent years. In dialogue with works that argue in favor of post-national sociologies as well as literature that criticizes the hegemony of the theories formulated in the so-called centers, this articles aims on reflecting  the idea of global sociology. The main sustained theoretical hypothesis is that the national experiences must be understood as bearing the potential of making important contributions to stimulate the theoretical discussion about sociological theories and concepts formulated in the centers. By mobilizing some sociological concepts such as public sphere and right to the city, originally formulated in centers, we suggest that peripheral sociologies could contribute to broaden theoretical formulations. In this sense, the theoretical construction of sociological theory must involve an equal dialogue between sociologists from the center and the periphery in order to construct a global sociology.

References

• Alatas, Syed Hussein (2000). Intellectual Imperialism: Definition, Traits and Problems, Southeast Asian Journal of Social Science, Vol.28(1): 23–45.

• Alatas, Syed Farid (2003). Academic Dependency and the Global Division of Labour in the Social Sciences, Current Sociology, November 2003, Vol. 51(6): 599–613.

• Burawoy, Michael (2008) Rejoinder: for a Subaltern Global Sociology?, Current Sociology, V. 56: 435-446.

• Calhoun, Craig (1992) Introduction: Habermas and the public sphere. In: Calhoun, Craig. (Ed.). Habermas and the public sphere. Cambridge; London: MIT Press, p.1-49.

• Conell, Raewyn (2007).Southern Theory: Social Science and the Global Dynamics Of Knowledge, Cambridge: Polity Press.

• Conell, Raewyn (2010).Learning from Each Other: Sociology on a World Scale, In SujataPetl (ed.) the ISA Handbook of Diverse Sociological Traditions, London: Sage publications.

• De Certeau, M. (1984) the Practice of Everyday Life, Berkeley: University of California Press.

• Enayat, Hamid (1982) Modern Islamic Political Thought, Austin: University of Texas Press

• Fanon, Frantz (1961). 1966: The Wretched of the Earth, NY: Grove Press (WE).

• Fraser, Nancy (1992) “Rethinking the public sphere: a contribution to the critique of actually existing democracyâ€. In: Calhoun, Craig (Ed.). Cambridge; London: MIT Press, p.109-42.

• Gardiner, Michael E. (2004) Wild publics and grotesque symposiums: Habermas and Bakhtin on dialogue, everyday life and the public sphere. In:Crossley, Nick & Roberts, Michael (Eds.), After Habermas: new perspectives on the public sphere. Oxford: Blackwell, p.28-48.

• Habermas Jürgen (1989) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge: MIT Press.

• _____ (1992) Further reflections on the public sphere. In:Calhoun, Craig (Ed.). Habermas and the public sphere. Cambridge; London: MIT Press, p.421-461.

• _____ (1998) Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Theory Discourse of Law and Democracy. Cambridge: MIT Press.

• Harvey, D. (2008) the Right to the City, New Left Review, V. 53: pp. 23–40

• Lefebvre, H. (1991) The Production of Space, translated by David Nicholson, Smith, Blackwell, Oxford and Cambridge.

• Mignolo, Walter (2000). Local Histories, Global Designs: Coloniality, Subaltern Knowledge, and Border Thinking. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

• Morseli, Fateme (2013) Rereading 18 Tir 1378 (10 July 1999), Keyhan News Paper, No. 20546, http://www.magiran.com/npview.asp?ID=2779028.

• Motamed, Arash (2011) Street is not an Achievement for the Green Movement, but It is a Requirement, Roozoonline Electronic Journal, http://www.roozonline.com/persian/interview/interview-item/archive/2012/february/13/article/-8684dd9709.html.

• Negt, Oskar & Kludge, Alexander (1993) Public sphere and experience: toward an analysis of the bourgeois and proletarian public sphere. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

• NTK, Quy (2010). Beyond Centre-Periphery: Higher Education Development in South-East Asia, Journal of the Pacific Circle Consortium for Education, Vol. 22(2): 21–36

• Perlatto, Fernando (2012) Habermas, a esfera pública e o Brasil. Revista Estudos Políticos, v.4, p.78-94.

• Purcell, Mark (2002) Excavating Lefebvre: The right to the city and its urban politics of the inhabitant, GeoJournal, Vol. 58, No. 2/3, pp. 99-108.

• Rahbari, Ladan (2012) Perception of Security in Urban Spaces and Women's Right to the City (EhsaseAmniatdarFazahayeShahrivaHagheZanan be Shahr), The first National Conference of Women and Urban Life, University of Tehran

• Sinha, Vineeta (2000). Moving Beyond Critique: Practicing the Social Sciences in the Context of Globalization, Postmodernity and Postcoloniality, South East Asian Journal of Social Science, V28 (1): 67-104.

• Taib, khairulMizan; Yatin, SaifulFarik; Ahmad, Abdul Rahman; Mansor, Ahmad Nazri (2008). Knowledge Management and Competitive Intelligence, Communications of the IBIMA, V. 6: 25-34.

• Turner, Bryan S. (1990). The Two Faces of Sociology: Global or National?,Theory Culture Society, V. 7: 343-358.

• Turner, Bryan S. (2006). Global Sociology and the Nature of Rights, Societies without Borders, V.1: 41–52.

• Zanjanizade, Homa (2001) Women and Urban Security (ZananvaAmniateShahri), Journal of Language and Literature, Faculty of Human Science and Literature, University of Mashhad, Autumn and Winter, No. 24.

Published

2015-02-19

How to Cite

Rahbari, L., & Perlatto, F. (2015). Challenges of a Global Sociology: Centers and Peripheries in Geopolitics of Sociological Theory. Asian Journal of Humanities and Social Studies, 3(1). Retrieved from https://ajouronline.com/index.php/AJHSS/article/view/2300