Compressive Strength of Concrete with Recycled Concrete Aggregate as Coarse Aggregate and Recycled Paving Block Aggregate as Fine Aggregate Partially Substituted by Recycled Brick Aggregate

Authors

  • Idi Priyono Bogor Agricultural University
  • Meiske Widyarti, Erizal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24203/ajas.v8i1.6057

Keywords:

compressive strength, natural aggregates, recycled aggregate, SNI 8140, 2016, SNI 03-0691-1996

Abstract

An excessive extraction of natural resources for aggregate in concrete mix can caused an environmental degradation.  According to Indonesia ministry of industry in 2017, the use of cement is predicted will reach 84,96 million tons, that can affected the use of aggregate for concrete mix are quadruplet to 250 – 350 million tons. Opimally, the use of recycled material is green method that can reduce an excessive extraction of natural aggregates and keep an environmental sustain. The aim of this study is to obtain recycled aggregate concrete compressive strength and examine recycled aggregate concrete quality in days 3, 7, 28, 35, and 90 along with a proposal of the use of recycled aggregate concrete as a building construction material. This research used experimental method of SNI 03-2834-2002 the standard of normal concrete mix design for f’c 25 MPa then built five types of concrete mix of REC B, REC C, REC D, REC E, and REC F with every types of concrete has four sample are used for compressive strength test. The fine recycled paving block aggregate (RPA) were used partially to substituted a fine recycled brick aggregate (RBA) at 0%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% by weigth. The result of this study showed the mixed concrete REC D with RCA 100%, RPA 50% and RBA 50% in 28 days is generate highest compressive strength than other recycle aggregates concrete mixes. Compressive strength at 28 days in a mix codes REC B, REC C, REC D, REC E and REC F are 18,12 MPa; 18,36 MPa; 19,35 MPa;16,69 MPa; and 16,39 MPa. The results show that it is feasible to replace a natural aggregate entirely by recycled aggregates. With compressive strength over 17 MPa at 28 days, mix codes REC B, REC C and REC D are recommended to use the recycled aggregate concrete for structure of residential buildings but mix codes REC E and REC F aren’t recommended and only allowed for non-structural concrete such as separate wall (SNI 8140:2016). Based on SNI 03-0691-1996 about solid brick concrete (paving block), recycle aggregate concrete with mix code of REC B, REC C, and REC D are able to use on paving block with B quality such as parking lot. While, recycled aggregate concrete with mix code of REC E and REC F are able to use on paving block with C and D quality which used for pedestrian, garden and other use.

 

Author Biography

Idi Priyono, Bogor Agricultural University

Civil and Environmental Engineering Graduate Student of Bogor Agricultural University

References

Mahmood SM, Hashmi SM. An Experimental Investigation on Strength Properties of Concrete Through Full Replacement of Sand by Copper Slag. International Journal of Structural and Civil Engineering Research. Vol. 3, No.4, 2014.

Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Bogor. Produk Domestik Regional Bruto Kabupaten Bogor menurut Kategori 2012-2016. BPS, ID, 2017.

Deng F, He Y, Zhou S, Yu Y, Cheng H, Wu X. Compressive strength prediction of recycled concrete based on deep learning. Construction and Building Materials. vol. 175 pp. 562–569, 2018.

Suárez. J, López F, Pérez CL, Serna P, Serrano MA. Influence of recycled brick aggregates on properties of structural concrete for manufacturing precast prestressed beams. Construction and Building Materials. vol. 149 pp. 507–514, 2017.

De Brito J, Pereira AS, Correia JR. Mechanical behaviour of non-structural concrete made with recycled ceramic aggregates. Cement and Concrete Composites. vol. 27, no. 4 pp. 429–433, 2005.

Vieira T, Alves A, De Brito J, Correia JR, Silva RV. Durability-related performance of concrete containing fine recycled aggregates from crushed bricks and sanitary ware. Materials and Design. vol. 90 pp. 767–776, 2016.

Debieb F, Kenai S. The use of coarse and fine crushed bricks as aggregate in concrete. Construction and Building Materials. vol. 22, no. 5 pp. 886–893. 2008.

Colangelo F, Cioffi R. Mechanical properties and durability of mortar containing fine fraction of demolition wastes produced by selective demolition in South Italy. Composites Part B: Engineering. vol. 22, no. 5 pp. 886–893. 2017.

Sunayana S, Barai SV. Flexural performance and tension-stiffening evaluation of reinforced concrete beam incorporating recycled aggregate and fly ash. Construction and Building Materials. vol. 174, pp. 210–223. 2018.

Khoury E, Ambrós W, Cazacliu B, Hoffmann C. Heterogeneity of recycled concrete aggregates, an intrinsic variability. Construction and Building Materials. vol. 175, pp. 705–713. 2018.

Pedro D, De Brito J, Evangelista L. Structural concrete with simultaneous incorporation of fine and coarse recycled concrete aggregates: mechanical, durability and long-term properties. Construction and Building Materials. vol. 154, pp. 294–309. 2017.

Oksri-Nelfia L, Mahieux PY, Amiri O, Turcry P, Lux J. Reuse of recycled crushed concrete fines as mineral addition in cementitious materials. Materials and Structures. vol. 49, no. 8 pp. 3239–3251. 2016.

Kumar R, Gurram SCB, Minocha AK. Influence of recycled fine aggregate on microstructure and hardened properties of concrete. Magazine of Concrete Research. vol. 69, no. 24 pp. 1288–1295. 2017.

Downloads

Published

2020-02-15

How to Cite

Priyono, I., & Erizal, M. W. (2020). Compressive Strength of Concrete with Recycled Concrete Aggregate as Coarse Aggregate and Recycled Paving Block Aggregate as Fine Aggregate Partially Substituted by Recycled Brick Aggregate. Asian Journal of Applied Sciences, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.24203/ajas.v8i1.6057

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 1 (2020): February 2020

Section

Articles

License

  • Papers must be submitted on the understanding that they have not been published elsewhere (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, or thesis) and are not currently under consideration by another journal published by any other publisher.
  • It is also the authors responsibility to ensure that the articles emanating from a particular source are submitted with the necessary approval.
  • The authors warrant that the paper is original and that he/she is the author of the paper, except for material that is clearly identified as to its original source, with permission notices from the copyright owners where required.
  • The authors ensure that all the references carefully and they are accurate in the text as well as in the list of references (and vice versa).
  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  • The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.