Determining Potential of Coastal Areas in Producing Ecosystem Services by using AHP Method: A Case Study in Artvin, Turkey
Keywords:
Ecosystems, ecosystem services, land cover, CORINEAbstract
The aim of this study was to determine the potential of ecosystems in coastal areas to produce ecosystem services by a case study in Artvin province and express such potential in spatial terms. In the study, a GIS-based evaluation was made using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). In this context, CORINE 2006 land cover map was reclassified and 5 ecosystems were found in Black Sea shore of Artvin province, which was chosen as the study area. These ecosystems are urban, forests, cultivated, inland waters and coastal areas. Ecosystem services produced by the ecosystems found were identified by considering Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA) report. Then these ecosystems were evaluated using AHP within themselves and in the context of services they produce. As a result, it was observed that the highest amount of provisioning services is provided by forests and cultivated, while the highest amount of regulating services and cultural services are provided by forests and urban, respectively. In the study area, the ecosystem services provided by ecosystems by the highest percentage include food, fresh water, climate regulation, water purification and waste treatment, aesthetic values and recreation and ecotourism. This study, by which the potential to produce ecosystem services was determined using land cover and analytic hierarchy process, provides suggestions for spatial-based planning studies in the sample of coastal areasReferences
• Akıncı H, Yavuz Özalp A, Turgut B (2012) AHP yöntemi ile tarıma uygun alanların belirlenmesi. -IV. Uzaktan Algılama ve Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri Sempozyumu. Zonguldak (In Turkish).
• Akıncı H, Yavuz Özalp A, Turgut B (2013) Agricultural land use suitability analysis using GIS and AHP technique. -Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 97: 71–82.
• Albayrak İ (2012) Ekosistem servislerine dayalı havza yönetim modelinin İstanbul- Ömerli Havzası örneğinde uygulanabilirliği. Doktora tezi, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Peyzaj Mimarlığı Anabilim Dalı, 244, İstanbul (In Turkish).
• Bennett EM, Peterson GD, Levitt EA (2005) Looking to the future ecosystem services. -Ecosystems 8:125-132.
• Bryan BA, Grandgirard A, Ward JR (2010) Quantifying and exploring strategic regional priorities for managing natural capital and ecosystem services given multiple stakeholder perspectives. - Ecosystems, 13: 539-555.
• Bunruamkaewa K, Murayama Y (2011) Site suitability evaluation for ecotourism using gıs & ahp: a case study of surat thani province, Thailand. -Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 21: 269–278.
• Chen N, Li H, Wang L (2009) A GIS based approach for mapping direct use value of ecosystem services at a county scale: manegement implications. -Ecological economics 68:2768-2776.
• Crossman ND, Burkhard B, Stoyan N, Willemen L, Petz K, Palomo I, Drakou EG, Martin-Lopez B, McPhearson T, Boyanova K, Alkemade R, Egoh B, Dunbar MB, Maes J (2013) A blueprint for mapping and modelling ecosystem services. -Ecosystem services 4:4-14.
• CSB (2013) Çevre ve Şehircilik Bakanlığı. Artvin İli 2013 yılı Çevre Durum Raporu. Artvin (In Turkish).
• CSB (2014) Çevre ve Şehircilik Bakanlığı. Çevre ve Şehircilik Bakanlığı Mekansal Planlar Yapım Yönetmeliği. Ankara (In Turkish).
• CSB (2015) Çevre ve Şehircilik Bakanlığı. Artvin Valiliği Çevre ve Şehircilik İl Müdürlüğü Faaliyet Sunusu. Artvin (In Turkish).
• Çivi A, Akgündüz E, Kalaycı K, İnan Ç, Sarıca E, Toru E (2009) CORINE Projesi. TMMOB Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri Kongresi. 10: 2-6 (In Turkish).
• Daily GC (1997) Introduction: What are ecosystem services? Natures Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Island Press. 10p.
• Daily GC, Alexander S, Ehrlich PR, Goulder L, Lubchenco J, Matson PA, Mooney HA, Postel S, Schneider SH, Tilman D, Woodwell GM (1997) Ecosystem Services: Benefits Supplied to Human Societies by Natural Ecosystems. Issues in Ecology.15 p.
• Daily GC, Polasky S, Goldstein J, Kareiva PM, Mooney HA, Pejchar L, Ricketts TH, Salzman J, Shallenberger R (2009) Ecosystem Services in Decision Making: Time to Deliver. -Journal of Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 7: 21-28.
• Erdoğan Ö, Çabuk A, Memlük Y, Perçin H (2013) Ekolojik alan kullanım kararlarına uygun rekreasyon alanlarının AHP yöntemi kullanılarak Kütahya kenti örneğinde irdelenmesi. -Harita Teknolojileri Elektronik Dergisi 5: 26-36 (In Turkish).
• Fagerholm N, Käyhkö N, Ndumbaro F, Khamis M (2012) Community stakeholders’ knowledge in landscape assessments mapping indicators for landscape services. -Journal of Ecological Indıcators 18: 421-433.
• Fontana V, Radtke A, Fedrigotti VB, Tappeiner U, Tasser E, Zerbe S, Buchholz T (2013) Comparing land use alternatives: using the ecosystem services concept to define a multi-criteria decision analysis. -Ecological Economics, 93:128-136.
• GTHB (2013) Gıda Tarım ve Hayvancılık Bakanlığı. Artvin İl Gıda Tarım Ve Hayvancılık Müdürlüğü 2013 yılı Faaliyet Raporu. Artvin (In Turkish).
• Hermann A, Schleifer S, Wrbka T (2011) The concept of ecosystem services regarding landscape research: A review. Living Reviews in Landscape Research 5:1
• Kandziora M, Burkhard B, Müller F (2013) Mapping provisioning ecosystem services at the local scale using data of varying spatial and temporal resolution. -Ecosystem Services 4: 47-59.
• Kavas E (2009) Analitik hiyerarşik süreç yöntemiyle İzmir ilinde heyelan duyarlılığının coğrafi bilgi sistemleri tabanlı incelenmesi. TMMOB Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri Kongresi. İzmir (In Turkish).
• Koschke L, Fürst C, Frank S, Makeschin F (2012) A multi-criteria approach for an integrated land-cover-based assessment of ecosystem services provision to support landscape planning. -Ecological Indicators 21:54-66.
• MEA (2003) Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and human well-being a framework for assesment. Washington (DC): Island Press.
• MEA (2005): Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Washington (DC):Island Press.
• Muhacir ESA (2014) Ekosistem servisleri kapsamında kırsal turizm alternatiflerinin değerlendirilmesi: Ankara-Haymana ilçesi örneği. Doktora tezi. Ankara Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Peyzaj Mimarlığı Anabilim Dalı. 139p (In Turkish).
• Müller F, De Groot R, Willemen L (2010) Ecosystem services at the landscape scale: the need for the integrative approaches. Landscape Online 23:1-11.
• Nahuelhual L, Carmonai A, Lozada P, Jaramillo A, Aguayo M (2013) Mapping recreation and ecotourism as a cultural ecosystem service: an application at the local level in Southern Chile. -Applied Geography, 40:71-82.
• Özcan O, Musaoğlu N, Şeker DZ (2009) Taşkın alanlarının CBS ve uzaktan algılama yardımıyla belirlenmesi ve risk yönetimi: Sakarya Havzası örneği. TMMOB Harita ve Kadastro Mühendisleri Odası 12. Türkiye Harita Bilimsel ve Teknik Kurultayı. Ankara (In Turkish).
• Öztürk D, Batuk F (2007) Çok sayıda kriter ile karar vermede kriter ağırlıkları. -Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi Sigma Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 25: 86–98 (In Turkish).
• Öztürk D, Batuk F (2010) Konumsal karar problemlerinde analitik hiyerarşi yönteminin kullanılması. -Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi Sigma Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 28:24–137 (In Turkish).
• Saaty TL (1980) The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. New York: McGraw-Hill International NY.
• Saaty TL (1990) How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. -European Journal of Operational Research 48: 9-26.
• Schneider A, Logan KE, Kucharik CJ (2012) Impacts of urbanization on ecosystem goods and services in the U.S. corn belt. -Ecosystems 15: 519-541.
• Sesli FA, Aydınoğlu AÇ, Akyol N (2003) Kıyı alanlarının yönetimi. 9. Türkiye Harita Bilimsel ve Teknik Kurultayı Bildiriler Kitabı 1: 769-780 (In Turkish).
• Shi C, Zhan J, Yuan Y, Wu F, Li Z (2014) Land use zoning for conserving ecosystem services under the impact of climate change: a case study in the middle reaches of the Heihe River Basin. -Advances in Meteorology, 1-13.
• TEEB (2010) The Economics of Ecosystems & Biodiversity. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A synthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB. Malta: Progress Press.
• Troy A, Wilson MA (2006) Mapping ecosystem services: practical challenges and opportunities in linking GIS and value transfer. -Ecological Economics 60: 435-449.
• Wallace KJ (2007) Classification of ecosystem services: Problems and solutions. -Journal of Biological Conservation 137:235-246.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
- Papers must be submitted on the understanding that they have not been published elsewhere (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, or thesis) and are not currently under consideration by another journal published by any other publisher.
- It is also the authors responsibility to ensure that the articles emanating from a particular source are submitted with the necessary approval.
- The authors warrant that the paper is original and that he/she is the author of the paper, except for material that is clearly identified as to its original source, with permission notices from the copyright owners where required.
- The authors ensure that all the references carefully and they are accurate in the text as well as in the list of references (and vice versa).
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
- The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.
