The Politics of Self-Determination: Why Has Abyei Remained a Conflict Hotspot Between Sudan and South Sudan?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24203/2wggpr59Keywords:
politics, self-determination, Abyei, protocol, conflict, hotspot, Sudan, South SudanAbstract
The contestations of Abyei by Sudan and South Sudan has continued to brew conflicts for the two sisterly states. While the conflicts emanate from the lack of clarity of eligible voters from the Abyei Protocol, 2004 of the Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA), 2005, the contestations graduated into the cacophony tunes of nationalism. The Government of South Sudan being led by the ruling party, SPLM and to the greatest extent, by the Revitalized Transitional Government of National Unity (R-TGoNU) argues Abyei as part and parcel of South Sudan and this can be confirmed by the conduct of a referendum for self-determination. Although this argument is being tweaked on the Abyei protocol that spelt out the voters as resident of Abyei and which the Ngok Dinka believe to be them since they permanently stay in Abyei, Misseriya Arabs, who seasonably graze their cattle at river Kiir consider themselves as voters in the Abyei plebiscite. Thus, this has caused contestations, tensions and conflicts in the Abyei area. Though the protocol has designated the Chief Administrator of Abyei Area, the ultimate goal was to conduct a referendum for self-determination alongside Southern Sudan referendum on 9th January 2011.
The paper argues that failure to conduct the Abyei referendum the same day with Southern Sudan referendum is to do with zero-sum interest of Government of Sudan to retain Abyei so as to own hydrocarbon resources. Abyei has enormous crude oil which the Government of Sudan doesn’t want to loss again like the way its lost 90% of its oilfields to South Sudan. This economic interest driven by centripetal politics has led the two sisterly countries to collide over Abyei ownership leading to sporadic conflicts in the region from 2011. While the Government of South Sudan insists that Abyei belong to nine Ngok-Dinka chiefdom who are members of greater Dinka of South Sudan and who are only eligible to vote, the Government of Sudan has categorically rejected this, leading to the cul-de-sac. While other attempts were made including the ruling of Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) of awarding the people of Abyei to South Sudan and oil resources to Sudan, this did not help in resolving the Abyei debacle.
The paper has used qualitative research design with a case study of Abyei and other drawn examples from contested areas such as Kashmir. It process-traces the Abyei contestations between Sudan and South Sudan. The study concludes that although Abyei remains a disastrous and highly contested spot amongst the contested lands in the world, contested lands don't have to remain contested and the two Governments of Sudan and South Sudan must immediately resolve Abyei status to eschew sporadic conflicts, deaths and destruction of properties.
References
Abyei Addis Ababa Agreement: www.abyei.net/?News_%26amp%3B_views:_1956-2005 (Accessed on December 2024)
Agnew, J. (2008). Borders on the Mind: Re-Framing Border Thinking. Journal of Ethics and Global Politics. Vol 1 (4): 175-191
Alier, A. (2003). Too Many Agreements Dishonored: Southern Sudan. Lebanon: Ithac Press
Biong. L. (2007). Overview of the Emerging Security Situation in Southern Sudan. Paper Presented at the Consultative Workshop on Defense White Paper for Southern Sudan. Juba.
Chol, J. (2010). Politics of Full Implementation of Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA). BA Research Project: Catholic University of Eastern Africa-Nairobi
CPA –Abyei Protocol: www.unmis.org. 63-69 (Accessed on January 2025)
Deng, F. (2009). Frontiers of Unity: An Experiment in Afro-Arab cooperation: The The Ngok Dinka of Southern Sudan and the Abyei Experiment with African-Arab Cooperation. Kegan Paul Africa Library
Deng, F. (1986). The Man Called Deng Majok: A Biography of Power, Polygyny and Change. Yale University Press, New Haven, NJ.
Government of Sudan and PCA Adopted Map: www.africa-confidential.com.../Abyei_map border. (Accessed on January 2025)
International Crisis Group (ICG) (2007). Sudan Breaking the Abyei Deadlock. Africa Briefing. Vol 1 (47):1-14.
Interview with Arop Madut, MP of Abyei Area constituency in London on March 7th 2012
Jimenez, V. (2008). Seeking Solution to the Crisis in Abyei Sudan. Public International Law and Policy Group-A global Pro Bono Law Firm. Vol 1 (2): 1-49
Johnson, H. (2008). Why Abyei Matters: The Breaking Point of Sudan’s of Comprehensive Peace Agreement. Journal of African Affairs. Vol 2 (3): 1-19
Johnson, H. (2010). When Boundaries Become Borders: The Impact of Boundary-Making in Southern Sudan’s Frontier Zones. Rift Valley Institute: St Luke’s Mews, London.
Johnson, H. (2011). Abyei: Sudan’s West Bank. Enough Project
Madut, A. (2012). An Appeal for Abyei Crisis. Speech Delivered at Oxford University. 5th March.
Moore, M. (2003). National Self-Determination and Secession. Oxford Academic.
Newman, D. (2006). Borders and Bordering: Towards an Inter Disciplinary Dialogue. European Journal of Social Theory. Vol 9 (2): 171-186
Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) Final Award: www.pca-cpa.org/showfile.asp? 1-286 (Accessed on February 2025)
Riak, J. (2021). The Birth of States: Successful and Failed Secessions. A Comparative Analysis of South Sudan, Somaliland and Western Sahara. Africa World Books-Perth-Australia.
Robertson, J. (1974). Africa in Transition: From Direct Rule to Independence. Hurst London
Sumantra, B. (2007). Contested Lands, Paths to Progress. Open Democracy
Sumantra, B. (1999). Kashmir: Sources of Conflict, Dimension of Peace. Survival: Global politics and Strategy. Vol 41(3): 149-171
Talbott, S. (2000). Self-Determination in an Independent World. Journal of Foreign Policy. Vol 1 (118): 152-163
Tibbs, M. (2002). Experiences of Colonialism in Sudan. Oxford University Press.
Venice Commission: http://www.venice.coe.int/docs/2006/CDL-AD. (Accessed on February 2025)
Wilson, W. (1918). Fourteen Points. Purdue University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jacob Dut Chol Riak
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
- Papers must be submitted on the understanding that they have not been published elsewhere (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, or thesis) and are not currently under consideration by another journal published by any other publisher.
- It is also the authors responsibility to ensure that the articles emanating from a particular source are submitted with the necessary approval.
- The authors warrant that the paper is original and that he/she is the author of the paper, except for material that is clearly identified as to its original source, with permission notices from the copyright owners where required.
- The authors ensure that all the references carefully and they are accurate in the text as well as in the list of references (and vice versa).
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
- The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.
