Communicative Interaction for the Construction of the Wasteland in Postconflict´s Colombia
Keywords:
Language, TAC, Wasteland, ACD, LEEN, RabanalAbstract
The objective of this article is to present the partial results found in the analysis of the narratives, made by the actors of the Rabanal wasteland, based on the communicative interaction, from the Theory of communicative action proposed by Habermas, Jüngen(Habermas, 1981 ). In this sense, this research assumed that the TAC is the interaction that actors perform for social construction, based on language. Likewise, in the methodological process three stages were developed: descriptive, analytical and interpretative; considering the postulates raised by the critical analysis of discourse from the critical-social perspective proposed by Neyla Pardo. It stands out in this research that the discourse that is built around the Rabanal wasteland is polysemic and ambiguous and does not favor consensus.
References
• Alsina, M. (1999). Intercultural communication. Barcelona. Anthropos Editorial.
• Bokser, M. (2002). Illegitimate legalities: human rights and social practices. Ediciones Colihue. Buenos Aires.
• Bouveresse, J. (2000). Wittgenstein Modernity, Progress and Decadence. Mexico: Philosophical Research Institute.
• Cárdenas Páez, A. (2012). "Language, Meaning and culture". In press group and publications UPTC (Ed.) Readings and Scriptures. Doctoral Lessons (pp. 39-68) . Colombia: printing and publishing group UPTC.
• Carrero, V., Soriano, R. M., & Trinidad, A. (2012). Grounded Theory. Grounder Theory. Montalbán: CIS.
• Gadamer, H. (1986). Truth and Method II. Ediciones sÃgueme Salamanca. Spain.
• GarcÃa C. (2001). Communication skills in the Spanish Language. Ministry of Communication, Culture and Sports. Madrid
• Grillo, M., Berti, S., & Rizzo, A. (1999). Local Discourses: th new and the old, the public and the private.
• González, M . (2002). “Ethical aspects of qualitative researchâ€. Ethics and university education 29 (may).
• Habermas, J. (1988). The logic of social sciences. Madrid: Tecnos. S.A
• Habermas, J. (1982). Knowledge and Interest. Madrid: Taurus.
• Habermas, J. (2008). Theory of Communicative Action, I. Mexico: Taurus.
• Habermas, J. (2008). Theory of Communicative Action, II. Mexico : Taurus.
• Habermas, J. (2011). Theory of Communicative Action: Complements and Previous Studies. Madrid: Cátedra.
• Habermas, J. (2002). Truth and Justification. España: Trotta.
• Hernandez Sampieri, R. (2003). Research Methodology. México: Mc Graw Hill.
• Hoyos, Guillermo y Uribe, Ãngela. (1998). Convergence between ethics and politics. Bogotá: Siglo del Hombre Editores.
• Leff, E. (2004). Environmental Rationality. México: Siglo XXI editores, s.a, de c.v.
• López, J. L., & Lizaga, L. d. (2008). Communicative Reason and Democratic legitimacy. Madrid: Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
• Mairal, R., Peña, S., Cortes, F., & Ruiz, F. (2012). Linguistic Theory. Methods, Tools, and Paradigms. España: universitaria Ramon Areces.
• Marcuse, H. (1954). The One-Dimensional Man. Essay on the Ideology of The Advanced Industrial Society. España: Ariel.
• MartÃnez Ferro (2013). Legitimacy, reason and right; two models of justification of political power: Universidad externado de Colombia.
• MacÃas, Cortés. (2003). “Theories of group communication in decision making: context and characterizationâ€. (Doctoral Thesis. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Departament de Comunicació Audiovisual i de Publicitat).
• Páez DÃas, L. (2001). The Frankfurt School. Critical theory of the Society. Essays and Texts. México: Unam .
• Pardo Abril, N. (2001). Habermas: A Proposal for Modern Linguistic Theory. Colombia: Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
• Pardo Abril, N. (2013). “How to make critical analysis of discourse: a Latin American perspective†Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Bogotá.
• Proyecto Páramo Andino “PPA†(2015). Rabanal Wasteland Retrieved at http://www.condesan.org/ppa/node/62
• Ridao S (2007). Pragmalinguistic Analysis of Conflict Resolutions. Labor Mediations. Universidad de AlmerÃa. AlmerÃa
• Rojas Soriano, R. (2006). Guide to realice social investigations. Plaza y Valdés S.A de C.V. México.
• Rojas Soriano, R. (2002). Social investigation: theory and praxis. Plaza y Valdés S.A de C.V. México
• Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2003). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. Barcelona España: Gedisa, S.A.
• Schütz, A. (2003). Social realiby problem. Madrid: Amorroutu Ediciones.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
- Papers must be submitted on the understanding that they have not been published elsewhere (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, or thesis) and are not currently under consideration by another journal published by any other publisher.
- It is also the authors responsibility to ensure that the articles emanating from a particular source are submitted with the necessary approval.
- The authors warrant that the paper is original and that he/she is the author of the paper, except for material that is clearly identified as to its original source, with permission notices from the copyright owners where required.
- The authors ensure that all the references carefully and they are accurate in the text as well as in the list of references (and vice versa).
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
- The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.
