‘Arrogant and Seductive’: Disclaiming the Opinion of G. L. Koster with Regard to the Authors of Traditional Malay Literature

Authors

  • Rahimah Hamdan Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Arbaie Sujud Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia

Keywords:

Sexuality, Panji Literature, dalangs, Malay, Traditional

Abstract

This paper re-evaluates the opinion of G.L. Koster with regard to the authors of traditional Malay literature, specifically of Panji Literature. The spread of Islam in the Malay world awakened writers to the purpose, facts and methods of literary creativity with regard to matters concerning ‘penmanship’. The responsibilities of Malay writers became more complex with the emergence of the Javanese influence, which brought a breath of fresh air into the world of Malay literature. Writers of the Panji Literature genre very daringly included elements of sexuality in their works, something that was considered a taboo subject that was not to be openly discussed in Malay society. Furthermore, the authors of Panji Literature failed to apply ‘the idea of the book’ in their compositions. Consequently, G.L. Koster labelled the authors of Panji Literature as ‘dalang’.The question is, if the authors were ‘dalangs’, then why did they also incorporate elements of trust, advice and guidance in the genre to balance the entertainment function? Being a Western scholar, did G.L. Koster understand the conventions of Malay authorship? By carrying out a textual analysis of three selected texts, namely Hikayat Panji Semirang, Hikayat Chekel Waneng Pati and Syair Ken Tambuhan, this study will challenge the role of the authors of the Panji Literature, who have been classified as ‘dalangs’ by G.L. Koster. The study found that the authors of the Panji Literature were intellectuals of their time who abided by the conventions of Malay writing. Therefore, based on their wisdom, they managed to adapt the elements of sexuality that enabled the Panji Literature to be accepted by the Malay-Muslim community. This was highly consistent with the conventions of Malay writing that focus on benefitting the audience and not simply composing blindly.

Author Biographies

  • Rahimah Hamdan, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
    Department of Malay Language, Faculty of Modern Languages and Communication
  • Arbaie Sujud, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
    Department of Malay Language, Faculty of Modern Languages and Communication

References

Baharuddin Zainal (ed.), Hikayat Chekel Waneng Pati, Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka, Kuala Lumpur, Kementerian Pelajaran, 1965.

Braginsky, V.I., Sistem Sastera Melayu Klasik dan Penilaiannya, Dewan Sastera, October, pp.42-51, 1989.

Braginsky, V.I, Evolution of the Verse Structure of the Malay Syair, Archipel, 42, pp.133-154, 1991.

Braginsky, V.I., The System of Classical Malay Literature, Koninklijk Instituut Voor Taal-, Land- En Volkenkunde Press, Leiden, 1993.

Braginsky, V.I., Erti Keindahan dan Keindahan Erti dalam Kesusasteraan Melayu Klasik, Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka, Kuala Lumpur, 1994.

Braginsky, V.I., Yang Indah, Berfaedah dan Kamal: Sejarah Sastera Melayu dalam Abad 7-19, INIS, Jakarta, 1998.

Braginsky, V.I., The Comparative Study of Traditional Asian Literatures: From Reflectives Traditionalism to Neo-Traditionalism, Curzon Press, Surrey, 2001.

Braginsky,V.I., The Science of Women and The Jewel: The Synthesis of Tantrism and Sufism in A Corpus of Mystical Texts from Aceh, Indonesia and the Malay World, vol.32, no.93, 141-175, 2004.

Emeis, M.G., Bunga Rampai Melaju Kuno, J.B.Wolters, Jakarta, 1952.

Farish. A.Noor, What Your Teacher Didn’t Tell You. The Annexe Lectures (Vol.1), Matahari Books, Petaling Jaya, 2009.

Harun Mat Piah, et.al., Kesusasteraan Melayu Tradisional, Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka, Kuala Lumpur, 2000.

Hooykaas, C., Penyedar Sastera. Terj. Raihoel Amar. gl. Datoek Besar, J.B.Wolters, Groningen, 1952.

Ismail Hussein, The Study of Traditional Malay Literature, Journal of the Malaysian Branch, Royal Asiatic Society, vol.39, no. 2, 1966.

Ismail Hamid, Kesusasteraan Melayu Lama Dari Warisan Peradaban Islam, Penerbit Fajar Bakti, Petaling Jaya, 1983.

Koster, G.L., Roaming Through Seductive Gardens: Readings in Malay Narrative, KITLV Press, Leiden, 1997.

Liaw Yock Fang, Sejarah Kesusasteraan Melayu Klasik, Pustaka Nasional, Singapore, 1975.

Mohd.Taib Osman, An Introduction to the Development of Modern Malay Language & Literature, Donald Moore for Asia Pacific Press, Singapore, 1961.

Nik Maimunah Yahya dan Zaharah Mohamad Khalid (ed.), Hikayat Panji Kuda Semirang, Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka, Kuala Lumpur, 1964.

Nik Maimunah Yahya dan Zaharah Mohamad Khalid (ed.), Hikayat Panji Semirang, Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka, Kuala Lumpur, 1992.

Noriah Mohamed et.al., Syair Ken Tambuhan,Yayasan Karyawan dan Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka, Kuala Lumpur, 2002.

Rahimah Hamdan, The King Who Loves Sex: The Functions of Literature in Traditional Malay Poetry, International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 291-298, 2015.

Rassers, W.H., Panji: The Cultural Hero. A Structural Study of Religion in Java, Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, 1959.

Siti Hawa Salleh, Kesusasteraan Melayu Abad Kesembilan Belas, Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka, Kuala Lumpur, 1997.

Siti Hawa Salleh, Kelopak Pemikiran Sastera Melayu, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, 2009.

Skinner, C., Transitional Malay Literature. Pt.1. Ahmad Rijaluddin and Munshi Abdullah, Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde, vol.134, no. 3, pp.466-487, 1978.

Sweeney, A., Authors and Audiences in Traditional Malay Literature, University of California Press, Berkeley, 1980a.

Sweeney, A., Reputations Live On: An Early Malay Autobiography. Berkeley:University of California Press, 1980b.

Sweeney, A., A Full Hearing, Orality and Literacy in the Malay World, University of California Press, Berkeley, 1987.

Sweeney, A and Phillips, N., The Voyages of Mohamed Ibrahim Munshi, Oxford University Press, Kuala Lumpur, 1975.

Teuku Iskandar, Kesusasteraan Klasik Melayu Sepanjang Abad, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Brunei, 1995.

Teeuw, A., Syair Ken Tambuhan, Universiti Malaya Press, Kuala Lumpur, 1966.

Wilkinson, R.J., Papers on Malay Subjects, J. Russell at the F.M.S. Government Press, Kuala Lumpur, 1908.

Winstedt, R.O., A History of Malay Literature, Journal of the Malayan Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, vol.xvii, 1940.

Downloads

Published

2015-12-15

How to Cite

‘Arrogant and Seductive’: Disclaiming the Opinion of G. L. Koster with Regard to the Authors of Traditional Malay Literature. (2015). Asian Journal of Humanities and Social Studies, 3(6). https://ajouronline.com/index.php/AJHSS/article/view/3372

Similar Articles

31-40 of 83

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.