Technology Adopted in Dairy Farms in the Central-Westerm Province of Chaco-Argentina
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24203/ajafs.v10i5.7071Keywords:
strategies, productivity, mechanical milking, small producers, subtropicsAbstract
It´s necessary to make visible the characteristics of the existing dairy systems in the province of Chaco, although it isn´t taken into account in the statistics. The objective of the work was to identify the adoption of technology in different groups of producers of dairy establishments in the center-west of the province of Chaco-Argentina. Visits were identified and made to 14 dairy establishments between September 2021 and July 2022. The drums were divided into three groups: dairy farm group of agricultural schools (GEA) with mechanical milking, group of dairy farms with only one milking per day (G1O) with manual milking and the group of dairy farms with two milkings per day (G2O) with mechanical milking. The medium and ranges were obtained. The number of cows in milking was 13 (4-24), 7 (12-15) y 14.5 (7-20) (p>0.05). The hectares dedicated to milk production of 18 (13-69), 45 (25-247) and 30 (20-235) hectares (p>0.05), the use of rotation within the lots, 66%, 57% and 100% apply technology. The age at first pregnancy was 24 (24-36), 24 (24-36) and 27 (24-36) months (p>0.05), the duration of breastfeeding in days, 210 (210-300), 180 (150-240) and 205 (200-210) days (p>0.05). The well-marked differences appear in the presence of floor and cement roof in the milking place that only the establishments of two milking possess it. The three groups perform hands hygiene before starting milking and nipple washing before the start of the milking. However, only GEA is the one that performs the sealing of the nipples at the end of the milking. The groups of producers of dairy establishments in the center-west of the province of Chaco-Argentina, which make two milking per day showed a greater adoption of technology in the social aspects and the milking routine. However, we must continue working and that forces the need to generate care policies.
References
Avilez, J.P., Escobar, P., von Fabeck, G., Villagran, K., García, F., Matamoros, R., García Martínez, A. 2010. Caracterización productiva de explotaciones lecheras empleando metodología de análisis multivariado. Rev. Cient. (Maracaibo) v.20 n.1
http://ve.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0798-22592010000100011
Bretschneider, G., Salado, E., Cuatrin, A., Arias, D. 2015. Lactancia: Pico y Persistencia ¿Por qué cuidarlos? INTA Rafaela pp3
Castro, S. 2018. Buenas prácticas para una terapia de secado efectiva. Asociación Pro Calidad de la Leche y sus derivados (APROCAL). www.produccion-animal.com.ar
Cheij, R., Ortiz, S., Eyheralde, G., Domínguez, M. Y., Marini, P. R. 2022. Productive Characterization of Dairy Farms in the Central-Westerm Province of Chaco - Argentina. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences, 10 (3). https://doi.org/10.24203/ajafs.v10i3.7012
De Nicola, M., Marini, P.R., Bassi, A., Biolatto, R. 2012. Pequeños tamberos santafecinos y Formoseños. Una manera distinta de afrontar una misma problemática.
http://www.aader.org.ar/XVI_jornada/trabajos/archivos/2012/021_trabajo_eter_de_nicola.pdf
Fressoli, M. S. 2013. Cuando las transferencias fracasan: Aprendizajes y limitaciones en la construcción de tecnologías para la inclusión social. Universidad Nacional de Quilmes.
Giordano, G. 2013. Estrategias tecnológicas de productores familiares tamberos, del territorio periurbano de buenos aires, según sus capitales y su trayectoria familiar. Trabajo de Tesis de Magister en Economía Agroalimentaria con Orientación en Desarrollo Rural. Universidad Nacional de la Plata pp88.
Irz, X., Lin, L., Thirtle, C., Wiggins, S. 2001. Agricultural productivity growth and poverty alleviation. Development Policy Review, 19 (4): 449-466. https://library.fes.de/libalt/journals/swetsfulltext/12093119.pdf
Juárez-Barrientos, J., Herman-Lara, E., Soto-Estrada, A., Ávalos de la Cruz, A., Vilaboa-Arroniz, J., Rivera, P. 2015. Tipificación de sistemas de doble propósito para produccción de leche en el distrito de desarrollo rural 008, Veracruz, México. Revista Científica, 25(4):317-323. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/959/95941173007.pdf
Krpalkova L, Syrucek J, Kvapilik J and Burdych J 2017 Analysis of milk production, age of first calving, calving interval and economic parameters in dairy cattle management. Mljekarstvo, 67: 58–70. DOI: > 10.15567/mljekarstvo.2017.0107
Landaeta-Hernández, A., Drescher, K. 2012. Instalaciones, conducta y bienestar en vacunos tropicales. Mundo Pecuario, VIII, Nº 2, 121-131
https://www.produccion-animal.com.ar/etologia_y_bienestar/bienestar_en_bovinos/61-instalaciones.pdf
Lazzarini, B., Baudracco, J., Brega, M., Bouman, M., Lyons, N., Cuadrado, C. 2018. Tinglado de ordeño.
http://factorhumanoentambo.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/3.-Tinglado-de-orde%C3%B1e.pdf
Ministerio de Producción. Provincia de Chaco. 2016. Plan de implementación provincial.
file:///C:/Users/Pablo/Documents/Pablo/pablo/disco%20Respaldo/Backup/pablo/archivos%20pablo/mio/trabajos%20revistas%202022/UNCAUS/PIP%20Chaco.pdf
Navarro, H. 2001. El enfoque de sistemas en el desarrollo de predios lecheros. Seminario de Leche. Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias, Centro Regional de Investigación Remehue, Osorno, Octubre. Chile. 187 pp. https://biblioteca.inia.cl/handle/20.500.14001/8760
Olechnowicz, J., Kneblewski, P., Jaśkowski, J.M., Wlodarek, K. 2016 Effect of selected factors on longevity in cattle: a review. Journal Animal and Plants Science, 26: 1533–1541. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311718426_Effect_of_selected_factors_on_longevity_in_cattle_A_review
Oros Noyola, V., Días Rivera, P., Arroniz Vilaboa, J., Martínez Dávila, J., Torres, G. 2011. Caracterización pro grupos tecnológicos de los hatos ganaderos dobrle propósito en el municipio de las Choapas, Veracruz, México. Revista Científica FCV-LUZ, 21(1):57-63 https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/959/95918054010.pdf
Perez, M., Schorr, M. 2020. Estructura productiva e ingresos de la provincia del Chaco. Tramas. Revista de Política, Sociedad y Economía. N12 33-52
http://tramas.escueladegobierno.gob.ar/numero-anterior/?pu=3180
Rodríguez, S. 2013. Adopción de tecnologías y desarrollo de las capacidades, el caso de la asociación de los agrolecheros de Usme, vereda el destino en Bogotá, Entre el 2009-2012. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana. https://repository.javeriana.edu.co/bitstream/handle/10554/12393/MesaRodriguezSandraPatricia2013.pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=y
Scaramelli, A., González, Z. 2005. Epizootiología y diagnóstico de la mastitis bovina, en: Manual de ganadería bovina doble propósito, editores: Carlos Gonzalez – Stagnaro y Eliezar Soto Belloso. Fundación GIRARZ. (En línea). pp 328-334. http://avpa.ula.ve/docuPDFs/libros_online/manualganaderia/seccion5/articulo 09-55.pdf
Sokal, R.R., Rohlf, F. J. 1979. Biometrícs–Statistical Principles and Methods in Biological Research. Madrid, H. Blume Ediciones. (in Spanish).
Subsecretaria Comunicación Social 2012. Se incrementa el ordeñe mecánico en los pequeños y medianos productores lecheros.
Valencia, L. 2013. Adopción tecnológica en el sector rural: Efectos de corto plazo de los incentivos monetarios. Universidad Nacional de Colombia. https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/bitstream/handle/unal/11802/1128404426.2013.pdf?sequence=1
Zavadilová, L., Štipková, M. 2013 Effect of age at first calving on longevity and fertility traits for Holstein cattle. Czech Journal of Animal Science 58: 47–57. https://doi.org/10.17221/6614-CJAS
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 R. Cheij, O. Mora, A. Viana-Evin, M. Radlovachky, P. R. Marini
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
- Papers must be submitted on the understanding that they have not been published elsewhere (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, or thesis) and are not currently under consideration by another journal published by any other publisher.
- It is also the authors responsibility to ensure that the articles emanating from a particular source are submitted with the necessary approval.
- The authors warrant that the paper is original and that he/she is the author of the paper, except for material that is clearly identified as to its original source, with permission notices from the copyright owners where required.
- The authors ensure that all the references carefully and they are accurate in the text as well as in the list of references (and vice versa).
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
- The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.
