Performance of Cowpea and Soybean in Nigerias’ Sudan Savanna as Influenced by Pendimethalin Application Rates

Authors

  • I. J. Dantata COLLEGE OF EDUCATION

Abstract

Field experiment was conducted at Gombe during the 2012 wet cropping season situated at Lat.110 30II N and Long.100 20II E at an altitude of 240m above sea level to evaluate the performance of two leguminous crops (cowpea & soybean)under different rates of Pendimethalin in the sudan savannah zone of Nigeria. The experiment consisted of six different rates of Pendimethalin (1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 6.0kg a.i.ha-1) + weed free and weedy check (controls) making a total of eight possible treatments which was laid in a split plot design and replicated three times. Results indicates that high rate of Pendimethalin resulted in an increase to days to 50% emergence, injury score (phytotoxicity), decrease in plant height as well as number of leaves of respective crops (P=0.05). However, the same higher rates resulted in maximum decrease in weed cover score, weed dry weight, number of pod plant-1 and eventually the final yield of both cowpea and soybean respectively.

Author Biography

  • I. J. Dantata, COLLEGE OF EDUCATION
    DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURAL EDUCATION, SENIOR LECTURER

References

• Adetiloye, P.O., Fabunmi, t.o., and Olasanta, F.O. Soil Nitrogen, Weed control of juvenile oil palm inter planted with some crops. Nig. J. Weed Sci. vol.18, pp.65-71, 2005.

• Adigun, J.A., Lagoke, S.T.O., Kumar, V., and Erinle, I.D. Weed Management Studies in Transplanted Tomatoes in the Nigerian Savanna. J. Agric. Res. vol.10, pp.29-39, 1993.

• Ahmed, G.J.U., M.K.A. Bhuiyan, C.R. Riches, M. Mortimer and D. Johnson. Farmer’s participatory studies of integrated weed management system for intensified low land. Proc. 8th Biennial Agron. Conv., Bangladesh Agron.Soc., Dhaka, 2005.

• Akhtar,M., Afghan, S., Mahmood, T. and Abbas,G. Effect of pre and post emergence weedicides application on nodulation, growth and yield of soybean at different fertility levels. J. Agric. Res-Lahore-Pakistan. vol.28, pp.29-37, 1990.

• Anonymous. Weed Control Recommendations for Nigeria. Series 3, Sponsored by Dept. of Agric. Fed.Min. of Agric, Nigeria. pp. 1-7, 1994.

• .Aslam, M., H.K. Ahmad, E. Ahmad, Himayatullah, M.A. Khan and A.G. Sagoo. Effect of sowing methods and weed control techniques on yield and yield components of chickpea. Pak. J.Weed Sci. Res., vol.13, no.1-2, pp.49-61, 2007.

• Duncan, D.B. Multiple Range and Multiple F. Test. Biometrics. vol.11, pp.1-42, 1955. Estominos, L.E. and Moody, K. Evaluation of herbicides for weed control in dry- seeded wetland rice (Oryzasativa). Philippine J. Weed Sci., vol.15, pp.50-58, 1988.

• Fadoyomi, R.O. Weed Management in Nigerian Agriculture in the 90s. The Chemical Weed Control Option. Nig. J. Weed Science. vol.14, pp.63-66, 1999.

• Fryer,J.D.(1983).In: Recent advances in Weed Research. W.W. Fletcher (ed) CABI, London.

• Jaibir, T., Singh, H.B., and Tripathi, S.S. Integrated weed management in intercropping of mungbean (Vigna radiate) and cowpea fodder (Vigna unguinculata) with pegion pea (Cajanus cajan) under western U. Pcondition. Indian J. Weed Sci., vol.36, pp.133- 4, 2004.

• Humpherys.L.R.Diversity of Productivity of Tropical Legumes. In: Tropical Legumes in Animal Nutrition; D-Mello, J.P.F. and C. Devendra (eds). CABI, Wallington, UK.pp.1-21, 1995.

• Hymowitz, T. Grain Legumes.In Advances in New Crops, edited by Jules, J. and James, E.S. Portland, Oregon. Timber Press, 1990.

• Kowal, J.M. and Knabe, T. An Agricultural Atlas of Northern States of Nigeria. Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria.pp.111, 1972.

• Lagoke,S.T.O., Choudhary,A.H, and Chandra Singh,D.J. Chemical weed control in rainfed cowpea in the Guinea Savanna Zone of Nigeria. Weed Res. vol.22, pp.17-22, 1982.

• Marwat, K.B., M. Saeed, B. Gul, Z. Hussain and N.I. Khan. Efficacy of different pre and post-emergence herbicides for weed management in canola in higher altitudes. Pak. J. Weed Sci. Res., vol.11, pp.165-170, 2005.

• Mohammadi, G., A. Javanshir, F.R. Khooie, S.A. Mohammadi and S.Z.Salmasi. Critical period of weed interference in chickpea. Weed Res. 45, pp.57-63, 2005.

• Murphy,A.M. Analysis of the growth and nutritional characteristics of Lablab purpureusand evaluation of digestability techniques. Unpublished MSc. Thesis, University of Guel, Canada, 1998.

• Nnanyelugo, D.O., Ngoddy, P.O., Okeke, E.C., and Ngwu, E.K. Impact of Cowpea Research in Nigeria, using the Rapid Rural Appraisal Technique.pp333-340. In Advances in Cowpea Research, edited by B.B. Singh., D.R.Mohan Raj., K.E, Dashiel., and L.E.N, Jakai. Co-publication of IITA, 1997.

• Pandey, J. and B.N. Mishra, A. Effect of weed management practices in a rice-mustard-mungbean cropping system on weeds and yield of crops. Annals Agric. Res. vol. 24, pp.737– 742, 2003.

• Parasuraman, P. (2000). Weed management in rain-fed cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) and green gram (Phaseolus radiatus) under North-Western Agro-climatic zone of Tamil Nadu. India .J. Agric, vol.45, pp.732 -736, 2000.

• Punia, S.S., R.S. Malik, A. Yadav and R.S. Rinwa. Effect of varying density of Cyperus rotundus, Echinochloa colona and Trianthemaportula castrum on mungbean. Indian J.Weed Sci., vol.36, pp.280 –281, 2004.

• Raman, R. and R. Krishnamoorthy. Nodulation and yield of mungbean(Vigna radiate L.) influenced by integrated weed management practices. Legume Res., vol.28, pp.128–230, 2005.

• Said, A.N. and Tolera, A. The supplementary value of forage legume hays in sheep feeding: feed intake, nitrogen retention and body weight changes. Livestock Production Sci. vol.33, pp.229-237, 1993.

• Steel, R.G.D and Torrie, J.H. Principles and Procedure of Statistics.2nded. MacGraw.Hill. Toronto, Ontario. pp.601, 1980.

• Usoro, N.J. Field screening of herbicides for weed control in tomato (Lycopersiconesculentum Mill). Paper presented at the 13th Annual Conference of the Weed Sci. Soc. Nig. National Cereal Research Institute, Ibadan, 5 Dec. 1983.

• Tanveer, A., M.A. Malik, Z.A. Cheema, A. Ali and M. Tahir. Effect of different levels of weed management on weed growth and grain yield of gram (CicerarietinumL.). Pak. J. Sci., vol.50, no. (3-4), pp.60-62, 1998.

• Tiwari,J.P., Kurchania, S.P., Paradkar,N.R. and Bhalla,C.S.Varietal susceptibility and weed control efficiency of fluazifop-p-butyl in soybean (Glycin max). Indian J. of Agric. Sci.vol.67,pp.147-149, 1997.

• Vaishya, R.D., M. Fayaz and A.K. Srivastava. (1996). Integrated weed management in chickpea. Ind. J. Pulses Res., vol.9, no.1, pp.34-38.

• www.tropicalforages.info.Factsheet-Mucunapruriens. http://www.tropicalforage.info/key/Forages/Media/Html/Mucuna prurienshtm. Retrieved 2008-05-21.

• Yadav, V.K. and S.P. Singh, (2005). Losses due to weeds and response to Pendimethalin and fluchloralin in varieties of summer sown Vigna radiate. Annals Pl. Protect. Sci. vol.13,pp.454–457, 2005.

Downloads

Published

2014-12-15

How to Cite

Performance of Cowpea and Soybean in Nigerias’ Sudan Savanna as Influenced by Pendimethalin Application Rates. (2014). Asian Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences, 2(6). https://ajouronline.com/index.php/AJAFS/article/view/1870