Optimization of Chitoasn Extract from Cockle Shell using Response Surface Methodology (RSM)

Authors

  • Zainal S Universiti Teknologi MARA
  • Noorul Fhadila K
  • Ri Hanum Y S
  • Rahmah M

Keywords:

cockle shell, chitosan, response surface methodology (RSM)

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine the optimum condition for the extraction of chitosan by using response surface methodology (RSM). The chitosan was extracted from the cockle shell (Anadara granosa). The extraction was optimized using five levels and five variables such as the concentrations of HCl (%), and its immersion time (hr), the concentration of  NaOH (N), the deacetylation temperature (oC) and its deacetylation time (hr). The extraction process was involved three main steps which were, dimineralization, deproteination and deacetylation.  A full factorial of central composite design by MINITAB software version 15 was employed to optimize the yield of chitosan. The optimum condition as predicted by the software was the concentration of HCl at 8%  with  16.5 hours time of immersion, concentration of  NaOH 2.6N,  deacetylation temperature at 61oC, and 1.5 hours  for deacetylation time. The determination of coefficient R2= 95.4 also was high, which means the experimental data was acceptable.

References

Kurita K., “Chitin and chitosan: Functional biopolymers from Marine Crustaceansâ€, Marine Biotechnology 8: 203-226, 2007.

Zhang Y., Huang X., Duan B., Wu L. Li. S., and Yuan X., “Preparation of electrospun chitosan/ poly (vinyl alcohol) membranesâ€, Colloid Polymer Science 285: 855-863, 2007.

Zohuriaan Mehr M. J., “Advance in chitin and chitosan modification through graft copolymerization: a comprehensive reviewâ€, Iranian Polymer Journal 14: 235-265, 2005.

Cerqueira M. A., Souza B. W. S., Teixeira J. A., and Vicente A. A., “Effect of glycerol and corn oil on physicochemical properties of polysaccharide films – A comparative studyâ€, Food Hydrocoilloids 27: 175 -184, 2012.

Majeti N. V., and Kumar R. A., “review of chitin and chitosan applications.polymersâ€, Reactive And Functional Polymers 46: 1-27, 2000.

Naznin R., “Extraction of chitin and chitosan from shrimp (Metaoenaeus monoceros) shell by chemical methodâ€, Pakistan Journal Of Biological Sciences 8: 1051-1054, 2005.

Gopal M., Pakshirajan K., and Swaminathan T., “Heavy metal removal by biosorption using phanerochaete chrysosporiumâ€, Appl. Biochemical Biotechnology 102: 227-237, 2002.

Cho S. M., Gu Y. S., and Kim S. B., “Extracting optimization and physical properties of yellowfin tuna(Thunnus albacares) skin gelatin compared to mammalian gelatinsâ€, Food hyrocolloids 19: 221-229, 2005.

Jaikumar V., and Ramamurthi V., “Statistical Analysis and Optimization of Acid Dye Biosorption by Brewery Waste Biomass Using Response Surface Methodologyâ€, Modern Applied Science 3: 71 – 84, 2009.

Naveena B. J., Altaf Md., Bhadrayya K., Madhavendra S.S., and Gopal R., “Direct fermentation of starch to l(+) lactic acid in SSF by Lactobacillus amylophilus GV6 using wheat bran as support and substrate: medium optimization using RSMâ€, Process Biochemisrty 40: 681-690, 2005.

Altaf Md., Naveena B. J., Venkateshwar M., Vijay Kumar E., and Gopal R., “Single step fermentation of starch to L(+) lactic acid by Lactobacillus amylophilus GV6 in SSF using inexpensive nitrogen sources to replace peptone and yeast extract –Optimization by RSMâ€, Process Biochemistry 41: 465-472, 2006.

Mirhossein H., Tan C. P., Hamid N. S. A., Yusof S., and Chern B. H., “Characterization of the influence of main emulsion components on the physicochemical properties of orange beverage emulsion using response surface methodologyâ€, Food Hydrocolloids 23: 271-280, 2009.

Kim H. M., Kim J. G., Cho J. D., and Hong J. W., “Optimization and characterization of UV-curable adhesives for optical communication by response surface methodologyâ€, Polym. Test 22: 899-906, 2003.

Choorit W., PatthanamaneeW., and Manurakchinakorn S., “Use of response surface method for the determination of demineralization efficiency in fermented shrimp shellsâ€, Bioresources technology 99: 6168-6173, 2008.

Hismath I., Wan Aida W. M., and Ho C. W., “Optimisation of extraction conditions for phenolic compounds from neem (Azadirachta indica) leavesâ€, International Food Research Journal 18: 931-939, 2011.

Segurola J., Allen N. S., Edge M., and Mahon A. M., “Design of eutectic photo initiator blends for UV/visible curable acrylated printing inks and coatingsâ€, Progress in Organic Coatings 37: 23-37, 1999.

Lee W. C., Yusof S., Hamid N. S. A., and Baharin B. S., “Optimizing conditions for enzymatic clarification of banana juice using response surface methodology (RSM)â€, Journal of Food Engineering 73: 55-63, 2006.

Zhong K., and Wang Q., “Optimization of ultrasonic extraction of polysaccharides from dried longan pulp using response surface methodologyâ€, Carbohydrate Polymers 80: 19-25, 2010.

Ghanbarzadeh S., Valizadeh H., and Zakeri-Milan P., “Application of Response Surface Methodology in Development of Sirolimus Liposomes Prepared by Thin Film Hydration Techniqueâ€, BioImpacts 3: 75-81, 2013.

Taccari M., Canonico L., Comitini F., Mannazu I., and Ciani M., “Screening of yeasts for growth on crude glycerol and optimization of biomass productionâ€, Bioresources Technology 110: 488-495, 2012.

Muralidhar R. V., Chirumamila R. R., Marchant R., and Nigam P.A., “Response surface approach for the comparison of lipase production by Candida cylindracea using two different carbon sourcesâ€, Biochemical Engineering Journal 9: 17 -23, 2001.

Downloads

Published

2014-08-14

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Optimization of Chitoasn Extract from Cockle Shell using Response Surface Methodology (RSM). (2014). Asian Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences, 2(4). https://ajouronline.com/index.php/AJAFS/article/view/1471