Brazilian Perspectives: Society, Stratification and Income Distribution
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24203/ajas.v8i1.6050Abstract
This paper aims to present a general evaluation on the inequality, income distribution and social mobility in Brazil between 2002 and 2014, under the governments of the Workers' Party. In this way, from the methodological point view, it is based on both a review of the literature about that subject and an investigation of the primary sources of the Brazilian social policies. Among the results found out, it can be highlighting the following sample: 1) historically, Brazilian society has been marked by inequality in several ways, and this is probably a consequence of his colonial legacy; 2) In the period between 2002 and 2014, Brazilian social inequality declined; 3) the decline of inequality can be explained by income growth, higher schooling levels and labor formalization, but the targeted social program, Bolsa FamÃlia, also contributed to income convergence; 4) Brazil slashed poverty from 25 percent of the population in 2004 to 8.5 percent in 2014, and extreme poverty declined from 12 to 4 percent over the same period. Conclusively, it’s affirmed, for example, that the reduction of inequality in Brazil was the result of firm political decisions, as well as of the quality in management and implementation of the public policies by the technical teams.
References
• Araújo, A. A. de. (2012). “Access to Higher Education in Brazil with Reference to Prouniâ€, in Higher Education Studies, Toronto, v. 2, n. 1, pp. 32-37.
• Barro, J.; Lee, J.-W. (2010). “A new data set of educational attainment in the world, 1950-2010â€, in Working Papers Series - National Bureau of Economic Research NBER Working Paper, 15902, Cambridge, MA, https://www.nber.org/papers/w15902 (accessed March 5, 2019).
• Bourguignon, F., F. H. G. Ferreira, and M. Menendez (2007). ‘‘Inequality of Opportunity in Brazil’’, in Review of Income and Wealth 53, no. 4, pp. 585–618.
• Campello, T. (2015). “The end to extreme poverty is just beginningâ€, in Tereza Campello, Tiago Falcão and Ana PatrÃcia Vieira da Costa (eds.), Brazil without poverty. BrasÃlia: MDS.
• Cogneau, D.; Gignoux, J. (2008). “Earnings inequality and educational mobility in Brazil over two decadesâ€, in Stephan Klasen and Felicitas Nowak-Lehmann (eds.), Poverty, inequality, and policy in Latin America. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, pp. 47-84.
• Gethin, M.; Morgan C. (2018). “Brazil divided: hindsights on the growing politicisation of inequalityâ€, in World Inequality Lab, 3, https://wid.world/document/divided-brazil-hindsights-on-the-growing-politicization-of-inequality-wid-world-issue-brief-2018-3/ (accessed March 6, 2019).
• Góes, C.; Karpowicz, I (2017). Inequality in Brazil: A regional perspective, in IMF Working Papers,17/225, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321791159_Inequality_in_Brazil_A_Regional_Perspective ( accessed March 4, 2019).
• Goldthorpe, J. H. (2005). “Progress in sociology: The case of social mobility researchâ€, in Stefan Svallfors (ed.), Analyzing inequality: Life chances and social mobility in comparative perspective. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2005, pp. 56-82.
• IBGE (2014). Pesquisa nacional por amostra de domicÃlios: sÃntese de indicadores. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE.
• Keynes, J. M. (1963). Essays in persuasion. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
• Keller, Y. (2012). Inequality and economic growth in Brazil, University of Zurich, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Information Technology, 2012 (Bachelor Thesis).
• Kinloch, G. C. (1987). Social stratification: an annotated bibliography. New York: Garland.
• Medeiros, M. (2016) “Income inequality in Brazil: new evidence from combined tax and survey dataâ€, in World Social Science Report, 2016. Paris: UNESCO.
• Ministry of Social Development (2015). Brazil without poverty. BrasÃlia: Ministry of Social Development. BrasÃlia: MDS, 2015.
• Pareto, V. (1968) [1901]. The rise and fall of the elites: An application of theoretical sociology. New Jersey: The Bedminister Press.
• Smith, R. E (2008). “The past, present, and future of income distribution in Brazil, 1960-2007â€, in IX Congress of the Brazilian Studies Association (BRASA), New Orleans, Louisiana, March 27-30, 2008, http://www.brasa.org/wordpress/Documents/BRASA_IX/Russell-Smith.pdf (accessed March 5, 2019).
• Van de Gaer, D. (1993). Equality of opportunity and investment in human capital, Catholic University of Leuven, Faculty of Economics, Leuven (PhD Thesis).
• Veblen, T. (2007) [1899]. The theory of the leisure class. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
- Papers must be submitted on the understanding that they have not been published elsewhere (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, or thesis) and are not currently under consideration by another journal published by any other publisher.
- It is also the authors responsibility to ensure that the articles emanating from a particular source are submitted with the necessary approval.
- The authors warrant that the paper is original and that he/she is the author of the paper, except for material that is clearly identified as to its original source, with permission notices from the copyright owners where required.
- The authors ensure that all the references carefully and they are accurate in the text as well as in the list of references (and vice versa).
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
- The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.
