Reducing the Effects of Adverse Drug Reactions: Assessing Knowledge and Attitudes of Nurses in Tamale, Ghana
Keywords:
Nurses, adverse drug reactions, Pharmacovigilance, Steven Johnson Syndrome, Toxic Epidermal NecrosisAbstract
Background
Detection and curtailment of probable ADR require decisive, continuous and close monitoring by knowledgeable health workers since ADRs have massive impact on both physical wellbeing and healthcare cost. This study assesses the knowledge and attitude of nurses towards ADRs
Method
Data was collected from 125 nurses from four major hospitals in Tamale, Ghana using a semi-structured questionnaire. Data was analyzed in GraphPad, Version 5.01.
Results
The overall knowledge score was 36.5% and an attitude score of 59.4%. Knowledge however had a positive correlation with attitude (r = 0.15, p = 0.0984).  Knowledge score on the definition of ADR was 21.9%,  but the worst scores were in relation to serious forms of ADR; Steven Johnson’s Syndrome (13.3%) and Toxic Epidermal Necrosis (1.07%) with majority (> 75%) unable to list a single symptom of them. Male nurses exhibited a significantly higher knowledge (39.26% versus 32.2%, p = 0.0009) and a better attitude than their female counterparts (62.1% versus 55.1%). General nurses were significantly more knowledgeable than other categories of nurses and also have a better attitude (40.25%, p < 0.0001). A good proportion of nurses (42.4%) attributed their less encouraging attitude towards ADRs to lack of knowledge, with 51.2% suggesting in-service workshops to be the most appropriate strategy to increase their appreciation of ADRs. Nurses who had prior training had a significantly better knowledge than their untrained colleagues (47.11% versus 35.67%, p = 0.0047) and also exhibited a better attitude than those untrained (64.4% versus 59.0%, p= 0.5288).
Conclusion
The knowledge of nurses on ADRs was poor but they exhibited a good attitude. Knowledge had a positive correlation with attitude and therefore giving nurses more training on pharmacovigilance will greatly enhance their contribution towards detecting and reporting observed ADRs.
References
World Health Organization. Safety of Medicines. A guide to detecting and reporting adverse drug reactions. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization 2002. WHO/EDM/QSM/2002.2
Lazarou J, Pomeranz BH, Corey PN. Incidence of ADR in hospitalized patients: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. JAMA, 1998; 279:1000- 1005
Rodriguez M R, Otero M, Rovira J. Assessing the economic impact of adverse drug effects. Pharmacoeconomics. 2003;21: 623-50.
Bates DW, Cullen DJ, Burdick E, Laird N, Petersen LA, Small SD, Sweitzer GJ, Leape LL. The cost of Adverse Drug Events in hospitalized patients; Adverse Drug Events Prevention Study Group. JAMA 1997: 277 (4) 307-11
Aspden P, Wolcott JA, Bootman JL, Cronenwett LR. Preventing Medication Errors: Quality Chasm Series, The National Academic Press, Washington, DC 2007.
Wasser Fallen JB, Livio F, Buclin T, Tillet L and Yersin B. Rate, type, and cost of adverse drug reactions in emergency department admissions. Eur. J. Intern. Med. (2001) 12: 442-7.
Lazarou J, Pomeranz BM, Corey PN. Incidence of adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients: A meta-analysis of prospective studies. JAMA (1998) 279: 1200-5.
Pirmohamed M, James S, Meakin S, Green C, Scott AK, Walley TJ, Farrar K, Park BK, Breckenridge AM. Adverse drug reactions as a cause of admission to hospital: Prospective analysis of 18820 patients. BMJ. 2004; 329: 15-9.
Patel KJ, Kedia MS, Bajpai D, Mehta SS, Kshirsagar NA, Gogtay NJ. Evaluation of the prevalence and economic burden of adverse drug reactions presenting to the medical emergency department of a tertiary referral centre: a prospective study. BMC Clin. Pharmacol. 2007; 28:7-8.
Hajebi G, Mortazavi SA, Salamzadeh J, Zian A: A Survey of Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Nurses towards Pharamacovigilance in Taleqani Hospital. Iranian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research 2010, 9(2):199–206
Lexchin J: Is there a role for spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reactions? CMAJ 2006, 174:191–192.
Lopez-Gonzalez E, Herdeiro MT, Figueiras A: Determinants of under-reporting of adverse drug reactions: a systematic review. Drug Saf 2009, 32:19–31.
Hazell L, Shakir SA: Under-reporting of adverse drug reactions: a systematic review. Drug Saf 2006, 29:385–396.
Inman WH: Attitudes to adverse drug-reaction reporting. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1996, 41:433–435.
Hall M, McCormack P, Arthurs N, Feely J. The spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reactions by nurses. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1995; 40:173–75.
Morrison-Griffiths S, Walley TJ, Park BK, Breckenridge AM, Pirmohamed M. Reporting of adverse drug reaction by Nurses. Lancet 2003; 361: 1347–48
Global Forum for Health Research. The 10/90 report on health and research 2003-2004.2004. www.globalforumhealth.org/filesupld/1 090_report 03 04/1 09004frontmatter. pdf. Accessed on 20/02/14
Eliasson E. Ethnicity and adverse drug reactions. BMJ 2006;332:1163-4
Amrita P, Kharbanda B. Knowledge, Attitude and Skills of Nurses of Delhi towards Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting, Indian Journal of Pharmacy Practice. 2012, 5: 45 – 51
Morrison-Griffiths S and Pirmohamed M. Specialist nurse reporting of adverse drug reactions. Prof. Nurse 2000;15: 300-4.
Hanafi S, Torkamandi H, Hayatshahi A, Kheirollah G, Javadi M: Knowledge, attitudes and practice of nurses regarding adverse drug reaction reporting. IJNMR 2012, 17(1):1–7.
John LJ, Arifulla M, Cheriathu JJ, Sreedharan J. Reporting of adverse drug reactions: an exploratory study among nurses in a teaching hospital, Ajman, United Arab Emirates. DARU Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences; 2012; 20:44
University for Development Studies: 13th Congregation’s Vice Chancellor’s report. Tamale; 2012.
Palaian S, Ibrahim MI, Mishra P: Health professionals’ knowledge, attitude and practices towards pharmacovigilance in Nepal. Pharmacy Practice (Internet) 2011, 9(4):228–235
McGettigan P, Golden J, Conroy RM, Arthur N, Feely J. Reporting of adverse drug reactions by hospital doctors and the response to intervention. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1997;44(1):98–100.
Food and Drugs Authority, Ghana: Handing over notes of Evans Paul Kwame Ameade, a Regulatory officer. Tamale; 2010.
Palanisamy S, Arul Kumaran KSG, Rajasekaran A. Knowledge assessment in adverse drug reactions and reporting. Archives of Pharmacy Practice. 2013. 4: 3
Li Q, Zhang SM, Chen HT, Fang SP, Yu X, Liu D,et al: Awareness and attitudes of healthcare professionals in Wuhan, China to the reporting of adverse drug reactions. Chin Med J 2004,117:856–861
Khalili H, Mohebbi N, Hendoiee N, Keshtkar AA, Dashti-Khavidaki S, Khalili H, Mohebbi N, Hendoiee N, Keshtkar AA, Dashti-Khavidaki S. Improvement of knowledge, attitude and perception of healthcare workers about ADR, a pre- and post-clinical pharmacists’ interventional study. BMJ Open 2012, 13(2). doi:10.1130.bmjopen-2011-000367. e000367
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
- Papers must be submitted on the understanding that they have not been published elsewhere (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, or thesis) and are not currently under consideration by another journal published by any other publisher.
- It is also the authors responsibility to ensure that the articles emanating from a particular source are submitted with the necessary approval.
- The authors warrant that the paper is original and that he/she is the author of the paper, except for material that is clearly identified as to its original source, with permission notices from the copyright owners where required.
- The authors ensure that all the references carefully and they are accurate in the text as well as in the list of references (and vice versa).
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
- The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.
