Teachers’ Perception in Implementing Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) at Maritime English Class
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24203/ajhss.v10i2.6944Keywords:
CLT, teachers’ perception, implementing communicativeAbstract
The objectives of this research were to find out the Teachers‟ perception in implementing communicative language teaching (CLT) at Maritime English class.
This research applied qualitative description. The population were the teachers at Polytechnic Maritime Barombong. The respondent consisted of 14 teachers. The research data were collected by questionnaire and analyzed by using goggle form to see the teachers‟ perception about the implementation of Communicative Language Teaching at Maritime English class.
The results of the research was: the teachers‟ perception in implementing communicative language teaching (CLT) at Maritime English class result which disclosed familiar and understand communicative language teaching (CLT). They also believed that Communicative language teaching (CLT) can improve the students communicative competence. The Teachers‟ perception in implementing communicative language teaching (CLT) at Maritime English class the researcher conclude that overall the teachers satisfy with communicative language teaching (CLT).
References
. Abe, E. (2013). Communicative language teaching in Japan: Current practices and future prospects: Investigating students' experiences of current communicative approaches to English language teaching in schools in Japan. English Today, 29(2), 46-53. https://doi.org/10.1017/S02660784 13000163
. Alderson, J.C. & Banerjee, J. 2001. Language Testing and Assessment (Part 1). Lan-guage Teaching, 34:
-236.
. Bachman, L.F. & Palmer, A.S. 1996. Language Testing in Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
. Bax, S. (2003). „The end of CLT: a context approach to language teaching‟. English Language Teaching Journal. 57/3, 278-28.
. Breen, M.P. & Candlin, C. (2001). „The Essentials of a Communicative Curriculum in Language Teaching‟. In Hall, D.R. & Hewings, A. (eds.) Innovation in English Language Teaching. London: Routledge. 9-26.
. Brown, J. D. (1995). The elements of language curriculum. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
. Brown, H.D. 2001. Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. New York: Longman.
. Burnaby, B. & Y. Sun. (1989). „Chinese Teachers‟ Views Of Western Language Teaching: Context Informs Paradigms‟. TESOL Quarterly. 23/ 2, 219-38.
. Canale, M. 1983. From Communicative Competence to Communicative Language Pedagogy. In J.C. Richards & R.W. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and Communi-cation (pp. 2-27). New York: Longman.
. Canale, M., Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1-47.
. Celce-Murcia, M. (2001). „Language teaching approaches: An overview‟. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language. London: Heinle & Heinle
. Celce-Murcia, M., Dornyei, Z. & Thurrell,
. S. 1995. Communicative Competence: A Pedagogically Motivated Model with Content Specifications. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 6 (2): 5-35.
. Colker, L.J. (2007). Hand-on Learning. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
. Cortazzi, M. & L. Jin. (1996). „English teaching and learning in China‟. Language Teaching. 29/1, 61-80
. Ellis, G. (1996). „How culturally appropriate is the communicative approach?‟ English Language Teaching Journal. 50/3, 213–18
. Freeman, D.L. 2000. Techniques and principles in language teaching (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
. Hiep, P.H. (2007). „Communicative language teaching: unity within diversity‟. English Language Teaching Journal. 61/3, 193-201
. Holliday, A. (1994a). Appropriate Methodology and Social Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
. Holliday, A. (1994). „The house of TESEP and the communicative approach; the special needs of state English language education‟. English Language Teaching Journal. 48/1, 3-11.
. Horwitz, E.K. 2008. Becoming a language teacher; practical guide to second language learning and teaching. Boston: Pearson Education.
. Iskandar, (2018). School-Based EFL Curriculum Implementation in Indonesian Primary Schools: A Perspective of Bernstein’s Pedagogic Device. The Asian EFL Journal October 2018 Volume 20, Issue 10.
. Jeyasala, V. R. (2014). A prelude to practice: Interactive activities for effective communication in English. Alternative pedagogies in the English language & communication classroom, 164-170.
. Lange, D.L. 1990. Sketching the Crisis and Exploring Different Perspectives in For-eign Language Curriculum. In D.W. Brickbichler (Ed.), New Perspectives and New Directions in Foreign Language Education (pp. 77-109). Lincolnwood, Ill: National Textbook Co.
. Littlewood, W. (1981). Communicative Language Teaching: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
. Littlewood, W. 2000. Do Asian students really want to listen and obey? ELT Journal 54 (1), 31–36.
. Littlewood, W. 2007. Communicative and task-based language teaching in East Asian classrooms. Language teaching 40 (3), 243–249.
. McCarthy, M. 2001. Issues in Applied Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
. McKay, S.L. (2002). Teaching English as an International Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press
. Medgyes, P. (1986). „Queries from a communicative teacher'. English Language Teaching Journal. 40/2, 107-112
. Moss, D., & Ross-Feldman, L. (2003). Second language acquisition in adults: From research to practice. Retrieved from http://www.cal.org/CAELA/esl_res ources/digests/SLA.html
. Nunan, D. (1987). Communicative Language Teaching: Making it work. ELT Journal, 38(2), 136-145.
. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/41.2.136 Richards, J. C. (2006). Communicative language teaching today. SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.
. Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
. Sato, K. & Kleinsasser, R.C. 1999. Communicative Language Teaching (CLT): Prac-tical Understandings. The Modern Language Journal, 83 (4): 494-517.
. Savignon, S.J. 1991. Communicative Language Teaching (CLT): State of Art. TESOL Quarterly, 25 (2):
-277.
. Savignon, S.J. 1997. Communicative Competence: Theory and Classroom Practice. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
. Savignon, S. J. (2001). „Communicative Language Teaching for the Twenty-first Century‟, In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (pp. 13-28). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
. Scarcella, R. & Crookall, D. (1990). Simulation/gaming and language acquisition. InD. Crookall & R. L. Oxford (Eds.), Simulation, gaming, and language learning (pp. 223- 230). New York: Newbury House.
. Schubert, W.H. 1986. Curriculum: Perspective, Paradigm, and Possibility. New York: Macmillan.
. Shamim, F. (1996). „Learner resistance to innovation in classroom methodology‟. In Coleman, H. (ed.) Society and the Language Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University. 105-121
. Shohamy, E. 2001. The Power of Tests: A Critical Perspective on the Uses of Lan-guage Tests. New York: Longman Pearson Education.
. Stern, H. 1983. Fundamental Concepts of Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford Univer-sity Press.
. Sumardi, M. 1989. Pendekatan Humanistik dalam Pengajaran Bahasa. In B.K. Purwo (Ed.), PELLBA 2 Pertemuan Linguistik Lembaga Bahasa Atma Jaya: Kedua (pp. 209-223). Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
. Tudor, I. (1996). Learner-centredness as Language Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
. Waters, A. & M.L.C. Vilches. (2001). Implementing ELT innovations: a needs analysis framework‟. English Language Teaching Journal. 55/2,133-141
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Nursyam, Basri Jafar, Iskandar , Sulaiman
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
- Papers must be submitted on the understanding that they have not been published elsewhere (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, or thesis) and are not currently under consideration by another journal published by any other publisher.
- It is also the authors responsibility to ensure that the articles emanating from a particular source are submitted with the necessary approval.
- The authors warrant that the paper is original and that he/she is the author of the paper, except for material that is clearly identified as to its original source, with permission notices from the copyright owners where required.
- The authors ensure that all the references carefully and they are accurate in the text as well as in the list of references (and vice versa).
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
- The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.
