Contribution or Constrain? Audience Interaction in Swedish Online Newspapers

Authors

  • Ulrika Andersson Department of Journalism, Media and Communication, SOM-Institute, University of Gothenburg

Keywords:

audience interaction, online participation, newspapers, journalists, chief editors

Abstract

A focus on audience interaction in online news media has increased rapidly during the past years. Online news media offer their audience several opportunities of interaction, for example, by submitting comments on articles or sharing pictures and videos. In addition, audience interaction has emerged as a fast growing research field: the motives for embracing online audience interaction have been analyzed and the kind of interactive opportunities offered by the news media has been mapped. Also, the question of whether audience interaction really contributes or rather constrains professional journalism has been vividly discussed. This study relates to the latter perspective as it examines professional journalists’ views on audience interaction. By focusing on the case of Swedish newspaper journalists, this study investigates how audience interaction is perceived to impact professional standards and to what extent such interaction is believed to be beneficial or rather an obstacle for journalism. Based on a representative survey of Swedish journalists, conducted in 2011-2012, and a survey of journalists working at local morning papers in Sweden, conducted in 2009, the analysis reveals certain dividing lines in media practitioners’ attitudes to audience interaction.

Author Biography

Ulrika Andersson, Department of Journalism, Media and Communication, SOM-Institute, University of Gothenburg

Department of Journalism, Media and Communication, SOM-institute

Ph.D., Senior Lecturer, Research Administrator

References

• Andersson, U. (2012). Metoddokumentation [Method]. In K. Asp (Ed.), Svenska journalister 1989–2011 [Swedish journalists 1989–2011], pp. 117-125. Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg.

• Andersson, U. (2013). Maintaining Power by Guarding the Gates. Journalism and Mass Communication, 3(1), 1-13.

• Andersson, U., & J. Wiik. (2013). Journalism Meets Management. Changing Leadership in Swedish News Organizations, Journalism Practice 7(6), 705-719.

• Bakker, P. & M. Pantii (2009). Beyond News. User-generated content on Dutch media websites. Paper presented at the Future of Journalism Conference, Cardiff, 2009.

• Blank, G. & B. C. Reisdorf (2012). The Participatory Web. Information, Communication & Society 15(4), 537-554.

• Braun, J., & Gillespie, T. (2011). Hosting the public discourse, hosting the public. Journalism Practice 5(4), 383–398.

• Bruns, A. (2006). Wikinews: The next generation of alternative online news? Scan Journal 3(1).

• Bruns, A. (2008a). The active audience: Transforming journalism from gatekeeping to gatewatching. In C. Peterson, & D. Domingo (Eds.), Making Online News: The Ethnography of New Media Production, pp. 171-184. New York: Peter Lang.

• Bruns, A. (2008b). Gatewatching, Gatecraching: Future for tactical news Media. In M. Boler (Ed.) Digital Media and Democracy: Tactics in hard times, pp. 247-270. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

• Bird, S. Elizabeth (2011). Are we all producers now? Cultural Studies 25(4-5), 502-516.

• Carpentier, N. (2012). The concept of participation, if they have access and interact, do they really participate? Communication Management Quarterly 21, 13–36.

• Chung, D. S. (2007). Profits and Perils. Online news producers’ perceptions of interactivity and uses of interactive features. Convergence 13(1), 43–61.

• Chung, D.S. (2008). Interactive features of online newspapers: Identifying patterns and predicting use of engaged readers. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13(3): 658–679.

• Chung, DS & S. Nah (2009). The effects of interactive news presentation on perceived user satisfaction of online community newspapers. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 14(4): 855–874.

• Chung, D., & J. Robinette (2008). Fast forward into the future: Trends in the interactivity of online news publications. Conference Papers - International Communication Association, 1-33.

• Deuze, M. (2005). What is journalism? Journalism 6(4), 442–464.

• Deuze, M. (2008). The professional identity of journalists in the context of convergence culture. Observatorio (OBS*) Journal 2(4), 103-117.

• Deuze, M. (2009). Journalism, Citizenship, and Digital Culture. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.) Journalism and Citizenship: New Agendas and Communication, pp. 15-28. New York: Routledge.

• Deuze, M., A. Bruns & C. Neuberger (2007). Preparing for an Age of Participatory News. Journalism Practice 1(3), 322–338.

• Domingo, D. (2008). Interactivity in the daily routines of online newsrooms: Dealing with an uncomfortable myth. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(3): 680-704.

• Domingo, D., T. Quandt,, A. Heinonen, S. Paulussen, J.B. Singer & M. Vujnovic (2008). Participatory journalism practices in the media and beyond. Journalism Practice 2(3), 326–342.

• Ekström, M., G. Eriksson & Å. Kroon Lundell (2013). Live co-produced news: Emerging forms of news production and presentation on the web. Media, Culture and Society, 35, 620-639.

• Fortunati, L., Sarrica, M., O’Sullivan, J., Balcytiene, A., Harro-Loit, H., Macgregor, P., Rousou, N., Salaverria, R., & De Luca, F. (2009). The influence of the Internet on European journalism. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 14(4), 928-963.

• Franquet, R., M. I. Villa & I. Bergillos (2011). Audience participation in online news websites: a comparatives analysis. Observatorio (OBS*) Journal 5(3), 223-242.

• Hayes, A. S., Singer, J. B., & Ceppos, J. (2007). Shifting roles, enduring values: The credible journalist in a digital age. Journalism of Mass Media Ethics 22(4), 262-279.

• Hedman, U. (2009). Läsarmedverkan [Audience participation]. Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg.

• Heinonen, A. (2011). The journalist´s relationship with users. New dimensions to conventional roles. In J. B Singer, A. Hermida, D. Domingo, A. Heinonen, S. Paulussen, T. Quandt, Z. Reich, & M. Vujnovic (Eds.) Participatory journalism. Guarding Open Gates at Online Newspapers, pp. 34-55. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

• Helberg, N. & De Munck, S. (2011). Caution! You are now exercising editorial control! – Exploring initiatives to raise the quality of User Created News, and their legal side-effects. Journalistica 1, 65-91.

• Hermida, A., & Thurman, N. (2008). A clash of cultures. The integration of user-generated content within professional journalistic frameworks at British newspaper websites. Journalism Practice 2(3), 343-356.

• Hermida, A. (2011). Mechanisms of participation: How audience options shape the conversation. In J. B Singer, A. Hermida, D. Domingo, A. Heinonen, S. Paulussen, T. Quandt, Z. Reich, & M. Vujnovic (Eds.) Participatory journalism. Guarding Open Gates at Online Newspapers, pp. 11-33. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

• Hujanen, J. & S. Pietikainen (2004). Interactive uses of journalism: Crossing between technological potential and young people’s news-using practices. New Media & Society 6(3): 383–401.

• Jenkins, H., & Deuze, M. (2008). Editorial: Convergence Culture. Convergence 14(1), 5–12.

• Jönsson, A-M., & Örnebring, H. (2010). User-generated content and the news. Journalism Practice 5(2), 127-144.

• Karlsson, M. (2010). Rituals of transparency. Evaluating online news outlets’ uses of transparency rituals in the United States, United Kingdom and Sweden. Journalism Studies 11(4), 235–245.

• Karlsson, M. (2012). The immediacy of online news, the visibility of journalistic processes and a restructuring of journalistic authority. Journalism 12(3), 279–295.

• Larsson, A. O. (2012). Interactivity on Swedish newspaper websites: What kind, how much and why? Convergence 18, 195-213.

• Lowery, W., & Anderson, W. (2005). The journalist behind the curtain: Participatory functions on the Internet and their impact in perceptions of the work of journalism. Journal of computermediated communication 10 (4).

• Medievärlden (2011). Hårdare regler för kommentering. [Thougher rules on commenting]. August 22nd 2013.

• Nel, F., Ward, G., & Rawlinson, A. (2006). Online journalism. In P. Anderson, & G. Ward (Eds.) The Future of Journalism in the Advanced Democracies, pp. 121-138. Aldershot: Ashgate.

• Newton, L. H., Hodges, L., & Keith, S. (2004). Accountability in the professions: Accountability in journalism. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 19 (3), 166–190.

• Nguyen, A. (2008). Facing “The Fabulous Monster.†The traditional media’s fearâ€driven innovation culture in the development of online news. Journalism Studies 9(1), 91–104.

• Nightingale, V. & Dwyer, T. (2007). New Media Worlds: Challenges for Convergence. Melbourne, Australia: Oxford University Press.

• Nip, J. YM. (2006). Exploring the second phase of public journalism. Journalism Studies 7(2), 212–236.

• Nip, J. YM. (2008). The Last Days of Civic Journalism. Journalism Practice 2(2): 179–196.

• OECD (2007). Participative web and userâ€created content. Paris: OECD Publications.

• Örnebring, H. (2008). The consumer as producer – of what? Journalism Studies 9(5), 771–785.

• Paulussen, S., Heinonen, A., Domingo, D., & Quandt, T. (2007). Doing it together: Citizen participation in the professional news making process. Observatorio (OBS*) Journal 1(3), 131-154.

• Paulussen, S., & Ugille, P. (2008). User generated content in the newsroom: Professional and organisational constraints on participatory journalism. Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture 5(2), 24-41.

• Phillips, A. (2010). Transparency and the new ethics of journalism. Journalism Practice 4(3), 373–382.

• Singer, J.B. (2005). The political j-blogger. ‘Normalizing’ a new media form to fit old norms and practices. Journalism, 6(2), 173-198.

• Singer, J. B. (2007). Contested autonomy. Professional and popular claims on journalistic norms. Journalism Studies, 8(1), 79–95.

• Singer, J. B., & Ashman, I. (2009). ‘Comment is free, but facts are sacred’: User-generated content and ethical constructs at the Guardian. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 24(1), 3-21.

• Singer, J. B., A. Hermida, D. Domingo, A. Heinonen, S. Paulussen,T. Quandt, Z. Reich, & M. Vujnovic (2011). Participatory journalism. Guarding Open Gates at Online Newspapers. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

• Skovsgaard, M., & Bro, P. (2011). Preference, principle and practice. Journalism Practice 5(3), 319–331.

• Thurman, N., & Lupton, B. (2008). Convergence calls: Multimedia storytelling at British news websites. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 14(4), 439-455.

• Van der Wurff, R., & Schönbach, K. (2011). Between profession and audience. Journalism Studies 12(4), 407–422.

• Verweij, P. (2009). Making Convergence Work in the Newsroom. Convergence 15(1), 75–87.

• Wardle, C., & A. Williams (2008). UGC@theBBC: Understanding its impact upon contributors, Non-contributors and BBC news. Cardiff: Cardiff School of Journalism.

• Westlund, O. (2012) Cross-media news work – sensemaking of the mobile media (r)evolution. Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg .

• Wildman, S. S. (2008). Interactive Channels and the Challenge of Content Budgeting. International Journal on Media Management 10(3), 91-101.

Downloads

Published

2013-12-14

How to Cite

Andersson, U. (2013). Contribution or Constrain? Audience Interaction in Swedish Online Newspapers. Asian Journal of Humanities and Social Studies, 1(5). Retrieved from https://ajouronline.com/index.php/AJHSS/article/view/610

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 5 (2013): December 2013

Section

Articles

License

  • Papers must be submitted on the understanding that they have not been published elsewhere (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, or thesis) and are not currently under consideration by another journal published by any other publisher.
  • It is also the authors responsibility to ensure that the articles emanating from a particular source are submitted with the necessary approval.
  • The authors warrant that the paper is original and that he/she is the author of the paper, except for material that is clearly identified as to its original source, with permission notices from the copyright owners where required.
  • The authors ensure that all the references carefully and they are accurate in the text as well as in the list of references (and vice versa).
  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  • The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.