Lenition and Fortition in Shul Dialect


  • Aliyeh Kord Zafaranlu kambuzia
  • Pegah Aryaei Faculty of Humanities Linguistics department Tarbiat Modares Tehran


Shul dialect, lenition, fortition, compensatory lengthening, deletion


This study deals with lenition and fortition processes according to the theoretical framework of generative phonology to answer the cited questions: how do the data support the application of lenition and fortition processes in shul dialect? In which contexts do lenition and fortition processes apply in shul? Finally, what are the most frequent lenition and fortition processes in this dialect?

Shul is a village located in the northeast from Genave County in Bushehr province. Data were collected by interviewing 3 male and 2 female speakers aged between 20 and 60. The corpus primarily contains free conversation and life stories. This dialect is similar to Luri dialect.

Surveying phonological processes in this dialect shows that lenition and especially deletion are more active than the other processes due to ease of articulation principle. The data show that the lenition processes tend to occur in postvocalic, intervocalic and the final position has the highest frequency for lenition processes to occur. Also the fortition processes tend to occur in inter-consonantal, pre-consonantal positions and morpheme, word and syllable initial positions. These results support Kenstowicz Ò†s idea that mentions: ‘final position in the word is the typical position for lenitionâ€.




. Windfuhr Gernot., the Iranian Languages, London & New York: Routledge, 2009.

. Luschützky, Hans Christian., Sixteen possible types of natural phonological processes, in: Charles W. Kreidler (ed), 2001, 506-524.

. Crystal, David., The Language Revolution, Translated by Shahram Naghshe Tabrizi, Tehran: Qoqnous, 2008.

. Bussmann, Hadumod., Routledge dictionary of language and linguistics. London and New York: Routledge, 1996.

. Goman Roderick. David., Consonants in Natural Phonology, PhD. dissertation, the Ohio State University. (1979).

. Boersma, Paul., Functional phonology, Formalizing the interactions between articulatory and perceptual drives. Utrecht: LOT, 1998.

. Kirchner Robert, An effort-based approach to consonant lenition, PhD dissertation, UCLA, (1998).

. Burquest D.A., Phonological Analysis, A Functional Approach, Dallas: SIL International. 20012.

. Kambuzia, K.Z. Aliyeh., Phonology Rule-Based Approaches& their Application in Persian. Tehran: Samt Press, 2006.

. Sobati, Elham and Kambuzia, Aliyeh, K.Z., Kurdish varieties of Ilam, Zana(ed): Ilam, 2013.

. MacKenzie, D.N., Pahlavi Dictionary, Translated by Mirfakhrayee, Tehran: Institute for humanities and cultural studies, 2000.

. Haghshenas Alimohammad, Phonetics, 3rd edition, Tehran: Agah Publication, 1992.

. Finch, G., Linguistic Term & Concepts, London, Macmilan Press Ltd, 2000.

. SÉ‘deghi A.A., MasÉ‘Éel e tÉ‘rikhi ye zabÉ‘n e farsi, Tehran: Sokhan, 2001.

. Kenstowicz M., Phonology in Generative Grammar, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1994.

. Arlato Anthony, An introduction to Historical Linguistics, Translated by Yahya Moddaresi, 1st ed. Research center on Humanities and Culture, (1994).

.Afshar, Iraj, Bibliography of Iranian Languages and Dialects, Iranzamin Glossary, 1st ed, , 3rd Volume,(1955).

. Kambuzia.K.Z, Aliyeh., Criticism and Correction of Mohammad Reza ,2006.

. Kambuzia.K.Z, Aliyeh. and Mahmoud. Mobaraki, Lenition in Persian Phonological System, Research on humanities and social sciences, 2013, Vol 3.No.17.

. Samareh, Yadollah, Persian language Phonetics, 1st edition, Tehran, University press, 1985.




How to Cite

kambuzia, A. K. Z., & Aryaei, P. (2015). Lenition and Fortition in Shul Dialect. Asian Journal of Humanities and Social Studies, 3(4). Retrieved from https://ajouronline.com/index.php/AJHSS/article/view/2745




Most read articles by the same author(s)