Analysing Errors among Form One Students’ Written English Composition in a Private Chinese School
Keywords:
Error analysis, English as a second language, essays in English, writing, grammatical errors.Abstract
Students’ studying in a private Chinese school have to master three languages which are Malay, English and Chinese. The first language is Chinese and English which is the second language acquired in school. Students face problems in learning the English language as they need to master the four skills; listening, speaking, reading and writing. Out of these four skills, writing is the major problem among the students. So, this study is aimed at in analyzing errors made by the form one students studying in a private Chinese school in the writing component. There were thirty seven students who wrote an essay on ‘The Hero’s Journey’. As the students are from Chinese speaking community who only speaks English language during the lessons, they find it difficult to write essays especially when there is a need to express them. All their errors in the essays were identified and classified into various categories. The results showed that the most common errors were made in mechanics, tenses, prepositions, subject-verb-agreement and word choice. This study has highlighted some aspects shared by the students and teachers who are teaching them to internalize the rules of the target language – English language. This study will enable English as second language teachers to understand the nature of the problems faced by students in writing essays and thus, prepare effective teaching materials to teach the students to write a better piece of essay.
Â
References
• Adams, K., & Keene, M. (2000). Research and writing across the disciplines (2nd ed.). California: Mayfield Publishing Company.
• Alhaison, M. (2012). An Anaysis of Article Errors among Saudi Female ELF Students: A Case Study, Asian Social Science-Canadian Centre of Science and Education, 8(12), 5566.
• Ancker, W. (2000). Errors and corrective feedback: Updated theory and classroom
• practice. English Teaching Forum, 38(4), 20-24
• Bacha, N.N. (2002). Development Learners’ Academic Writing Skills in Higher Education: A Study for Education Reform. Language & Education, 16(3), 161-177.
• Brown, H. Doughlas. 1980. Principles of Language Learning and Teaching-4th edition
• (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.L Prentice-Hall, 2000)
• Brown, C. (2000). The interrelation between speech perception and phonological acquisition from infant to adult. Great Britain: Balckwell Publishers Limited.
• Candling, R.B. (2001). Vocabulary and language teaching. New York: Longman Inc.
• Chang Feng, H.O. (2000). Mark-up based writing errors analysis model in an on-line classroom. Eric.www.Eric.com
• Chanquoy, L. (2001). How to make it easier for children to revise their writing. British journal of educational psychology printed in Great Britain.
• Corder, S.P. (1976). The Significance of learners’ errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 5(4), 161-169.
• Cristal, D. (1999). The penguin dictionary of language (2nded.). Panguin.
• Darus, S. and Subramaniam, K (2009), Error analysis of the written English essays of secondary school students in Malaysia: A case study, European Journal of Social Science, 8 (3), 483-495.
• Erdogan, V. (2005).Contribution of Error Analysis to Foreign Language Teaching.Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education. 2, 261-270
• Finnochiaro, Mary. 1974. English as a Second Language: From Theory to Practice. New York: Regents Publishing Company Inc.
• Gaudart, H. (1987), English language teaching in Malaysia: A historical account. The English Teacher Vol XV1 (Online): http://www.melta.org.my/ET/1987/main2.html (4 March 2000).
• James, C. (1988). Errors in language learning and use: Exploring error analysis. Harlow, Essex: Addispm Wesley Longman Limited.
• James, C. (2001).Errors in language learning and use: Exploring error analysis. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
• Lim Ho Peng. (1976). An error analysis of English composition written by Malaysian
• speaking high school students. Unpublished Masters Thesis, University of California Los
• Angeles.
• Mitchel, R. and Myles M. (2004). Second language learning theories. New York: Hodder Arnold.
• Pak-TaoNg. P. (2003). Effective Writing: A Guide for Social Science Students, the Chinese University of Hong Kong.
• Ramelan. 1992. Introduction to Linguistics Analysis. Semarang: IKIP Semarang Press.
• Raimes, A. (1983).Techniques in teaching writing. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Richard, J.C. (1971), Error analysis and second language strategies. Language Science
• 17:12-22
• Ridha, N. (2012). The Effect of EFL Learners' Mother Tongue on their Writings in English: An Error Analysis Study.Journal of the College of Arts. University of Basrah,60,22-45.
• Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 10, 209-231.
• Serombe, P.G. (2000). Learner language and the consideration of idiosyncracies by students of English as a second language or foreign language in the context of Brunei Darussalam. In A.M. Noor et al. (eds.) Strategising teaching and learning in the 21st century. Proceedings of the International Conference on Teaching and Learning. Faculty of Education: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi.
• Ulijn, J. and J.B. Strother (1995), Communicating in Business and Technology: From Psycholinguistic Theory to International Practice, New York/Frankfurt: Lang, ISBN nr. 3-631-43289-5, 382 p. (u.fedderies@peterlang.com) (Chapter 7)
• Vahdatinejad, S. (2008). Students’ error analysis and attitude towards teacher feedback
• using selected software: a case study. Unpublished Master thesis. University Kebangsaan
• Malaysia Bangi.
• Voon Foo, C.T. (2007). The Effects of the Process-Genre Approach to Writing Instruction on the Expository Essays of ESL Students in a Malaysia Secondary School. Unpublished PHD thesis, Universiti Sains Malaysia. Penang, Malaysia.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
- Papers must be submitted on the understanding that they have not been published elsewhere (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, or thesis) and are not currently under consideration by another journal published by any other publisher.
- It is also the authors responsibility to ensure that the articles emanating from a particular source are submitted with the necessary approval.
- The authors warrant that the paper is original and that he/she is the author of the paper, except for material that is clearly identified as to its original source, with permission notices from the copyright owners where required.
- The authors ensure that all the references carefully and they are accurate in the text as well as in the list of references (and vice versa).
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
- The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.
