Students’ Reflections from a Media Literacy and Production Approach to Unam Echo: An Online Training Publication

Authors

  • Eno Akpabio
  • Fred Mwilima Lecturer: Media Studies Department of Information and Communication Studies, University of Namibia

Keywords:

Media Literacy, Training Publication, UNAM Echo, Namibia

Abstract

In this paper we describe the students’ experiences in the implementation of the first online newspaper, UNAM Echo, produced and managed by media studies. This rewarding experience is in sync with the concept of media literacy as espoused by Brown (1998) and Zettl (1998) which has come to embrace production of traditional and new media content and away from its earlier fixation with critical analysis and appreciation of literary works and effective communication.  

References

• Banerjee, S.C., & Greene, K. (2006). ‘Analysis versus production: Adolescent cognitive and attitudinal responses to anti-smoking Interventions’, Journal of Communication, 56(4), 773-794.

• Brown, J.A. (1998). ‘Media literacy perspectives’, Journal of Communication, 48(1), 44-57.

• Carr, P.R. (2011). Does your vote count? Critical pedagogy and democracy. New York, NY: Peter Lang AG.

• Christ, W.G., & Potter, W.J. (1998). ‘Media literacy education, and the academy’, Journal of Communication, 48(1), 5-15.

• Considine, D., Horton, J., & Moorman, G. (2009). ‘Teaching and reaching the millennial generation through media literacy’, Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 52(6), 471-461.

• Cooper, C.B. (2011). ‘Media literacy as a key strategy towards improving public acceptance of climate change science’, Bioscience. 61(3), 231-237.

• Hinchey, P.H. (2003). ‘Introduction: Teaching media literacy: Not if, but why and how’, The Clearing House, 76(6), 268-270.

• Hobbs, R. (2005). ‘The state of media literacy education’, Journal of Communication, 55(4), 865-871.

• Hobbs, R. (1998). ‘The seven great debates in the media literacy movement’, Journal of Communication, 48(1), 16-32.

• Jeung, S., Cho, H., & Hwang, Y. (2012). ‘Media literacy interventions: A meta-analytic review’, Journal of Communication, 62(3), 454-472.

• Lin, T., Li, J., Deng, F., & Lee, L. (2013). ‘Understanding new media literacy: An explorative theoretical framework’, Educational Technology & Society, 16(4), 160-170.

• Meyrowitz, J. (1998). ‘Multiple media literacies’, Journal of Communication, 48(1), 96-108.

• Morrow, J. (1980). ‘Media literacy in the 80s’, The English Teacher, 69(1), 48-51.

• Paillotiet, A.W., Semali, L., Rodenberg, R.K., Giles, J.K., & Macaul, S.L. (2000). ‘Intermediality: Bridge to critical media literacy’, The Reading Teacher, 54(2), 208-219.

• Semali, L. (2003). ‘Ways with visual languages: Making the case for critical media literacy’, The Clearing House, 76(6), 271-277.

• Sperry, C. (2012). ‘Teaching critical thinking through media literacy’, Science Scope, 35(9), 56-60.

• Treadwell, D. (2014). Introducing communication research: Paths of inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Ltd.

• Wan, G., & Gut, D.M. (2008). ‘Media use by Chinese and U.S. secondary school students: Implication for media literacy education’, Theory into Practice, 47(3), 178-185.

• Wimmer, R.D., & Dominick, J.R. (2006). Mass media research: An introduction. Boston, MA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.

• Zettl, H. (1998). ‘Contextual media aesthetics as the basis for media literacy’, Journal of Communication, 48(1), 81-95.

•

Downloads

Published

2017-12-16

How to Cite

Akpabio, E., & Mwilima, F. (2017). Students’ Reflections from a Media Literacy and Production Approach to Unam Echo: An Online Training Publication. Asian Journal of Business and Management, 5(6). Retrieved from https://ajouronline.com/index.php/AJBM/article/view/5104

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 6 (2017): December 2017

Section

Articles

License

  • Papers must be submitted on the understanding that they have not been published elsewhere (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, or thesis) and are not currently under consideration by another journal published by any other publisher.
  • It is also the authors responsibility to ensure that the articles emanating from a particular source are submitted with the necessary approval.
  • The authors warrant that the paper is original and that he/she is the author of the paper, except for material that is clearly identified as to its original source, with permission notices from the copyright owners where required.
  • The authors ensure that all the references carefully and they are accurate in the text as well as in the list of references (and vice versa).
  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  • The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.