Demand for Money in Namibia: An ARDL Bounds Testing Approach
Keywords:
Money Demand, unit root, cointegration, Bounds test, stability, real income, inflation, NamibiaAbstract
This paper examines the demand for money in Namibia. Time series techniques such as unit root test, cointegration and Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) approach were utilized on quarterly data for the period 2000:Q1 to 2012:Q4. The results based on the unit root test shows that the variables are integrated of order one. The bound testing approach to cointegration reveal that there is no cointegration among real money aggregates (M1 and M2), real income, inflation and interest rate. Therefore, the stability of demand for money function could not be established.
Â
References
Akinlo, A. E. (2006). The Stability of Money Demand in Nigeria: An Autoregressive Distributed Lag Approach. Journal of Policy Modeling, 28, 445-452.
Bahmani-Oskooee, M. (2001). How stable is M2 money demand function in Japan? Japan and the World Economy, 13(4), 455-461.
Bahmani-Oskooee, M. & Raymond Chi Wing Ng, R. (2002). Long run Demand for money in Hong Kong: An Application of the ARDL Model. International Journal of Business and Economics, 1(2), 147-155.
Bahmani-Oskooee, M. & Wang, Y. (2007). How Stable is the Demand for Money in China? Journal of Economic Development, 32(1)
BON. (2000 - 2012). Annual Reports. Windhoek.
BON. (2000 – 2012). Quarterly Bulletins. Windhoek.
Bose, S. & Rahman, H. (1996). The Demand for Money in Canada: A Cointegration Analysis. International Economic Journal, 10 (4), 29-45.
Bashier, A. & Dahlan, A. (2011). The money demand function for Jordan: An Empirical Investigation. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(5), 77-86.
Budha, B. B. (2012). Demand for Money in Nepal: An ARDL Bounds Testing Approach. NRB Working Paper
Gaurisankar, S. & Kwie-Jurgens, N. O. A. (2012). The Money Demand Function in Suriname. Presented at the 44th Annual Monetary Studies Conference Paramaribo, Suriname November 7-9, 2012
Halicioglu, F. & Ugur, M. (2005). On Stability of Money Demand for a Developing OECD Country. Global Business and Economic Review, 7(8).
Hamori, N. & Hamori, S. (1999). Stability of Money Demand Function in Germany. Applied Economics Letters, 6, 329-332.
Hendry, F. S. (1995). Dynamic Econometrics. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Ikhide, S. I. & Katjomuise, K. (1999). Estimation of the Demand for Money in Namibia. Bank of Namibia Occasional Paper, No.1.
Iyoboyi, M. & Pedro, L. M. (2013). The Demand for Money in Nigeria: Evidence from Bounds Testing Approach. Business and Economics Journal, 76.
Keynes, J. (1936). The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. New York, NY: Macmillan Cambridge University Press.
Kharel, R. M. & Koirala, T. P. (2010). Modelling Demand for Money in Nepal. NRB Working Paper
Khatiwada, Y. R. (1997). Estimating the Money Demand in Nepal: Some Empirical Issues. Economic Review, Occasional Papers, NRB No.9.
Kumar, S & Manoka, B. (2008). Testing the Stability of Demand for Money in Tonga. MPRA Paper No. 19300.
Laidler, D. E. W. (1985). The Demand for Money; Theories, Evidence, and Problems, Harper & Row, Publishers, New York.
Lungu, M., Simwaka, K., Chiumia, A., Palamuleni, A. & Jombo, W. (2012). Money Demand Function for Malawi: Implications for Monetary Policy Conduct. Banks and Bank Systems 7(1), 50-63.
Mabuku, M. M. M. (2009). Investigating the Stability of Money Demand in Namibia. Unpublished Masters Thesis. University of Namibia. Windhoek, Namibia.
Mankiw, G. (2010). Macroeconomics. New York, NY: Worth Publishers.
Mishkin, F. S. (2007). The Economics of Money, Banking and Financial Markets. Eighth Edition, Pearson Education, Columbia University, United States of America
Mishkin, F. S. (2009). The Economics of Money, Banking and Financial Markets. United States of America: Pearson Education, Inc.
Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y. & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds Testing Approaches to the Analysis of Level Relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16, 289-326.
Narayan, P. K. (2004). Reformulating Critical Values for the Bounds F-statistics Approach to Cointegration: An Application to the Tourism Demand Model for Fiji. Discussion Papers.
Sahadudheen, I. (2012). Demand for Money and Exchange rate: Evidence for Wealth in India. Undergraduate Economic Review, 8(1), 1-15.
Telyukova, I. (2008). Theories of money demand. (UBC Economics PowerPoint slides)
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
- Papers must be submitted on the understanding that they have not been published elsewhere (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, or thesis) and are not currently under consideration by another journal published by any other publisher.
- It is also the authors responsibility to ensure that the articles emanating from a particular source are submitted with the necessary approval.
- The authors warrant that the paper is original and that he/she is the author of the paper, except for material that is clearly identified as to its original source, with permission notices from the copyright owners where required.
- The authors ensure that all the references carefully and they are accurate in the text as well as in the list of references (and vice versa).
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
- The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.