E-module Development Model I Came to Facilitate Student Independence in Learning Mathematics

Authors

  • Nila Sari Latif Department of Mathematics, Universitas Negeri Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia
  • Hamzah Upu Department of Mathematics, Universitas Negeri Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia
  • Ahmad Talib Department of Mathematics, Universitas Negeri Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24203/ajas.v10i4.7037

Keywords:

e-Modul, Model I CAME, Independent Learning, Mathematics

Abstract

To help students learn independently in online learning mathematics at the junior high school level, interactive e-modules are needed. The purpose of this research is to determine the steps for developing, prototyping, and evaluating the effectiveness of the e-Module Model I CAME in facilitating the independence of students in Class VII Semester I in learning algebraic forms at the SMP/MTs level. The Dick and Carey model of research and development (R&D) includes ten stages: a preliminary study, e-Module design, validation and testing, and final product. Individual trials, as well as small group tests and field tests for teachers and students using questionnaires, observation guidelines, and interviews, have been used to validate the e-Module. To determine the effectiveness of the e-Module, the data were analyzed using qualitative and quantitative data analysis, as well as one group pre-test and post-test analysis. The results of the study found that the e-Module product model I CAME developed was feasible and effective in facilitating students to learn independently on the algebraic form of material. The e-Module I CAME model fulfils the aspects of content feasibility, presentation, language accuracy, graphics, suitability of the presentation structure with the I CAME model, and student learning independence, which can increase student learning activities with the e-Module presentation structure and syntax of the I CAME model, and received a very positive response from students so that they could achieve a value above the KKM 75 and classical completeness above the predetermined 85%.

References

Ahmed, K., Chung, E.-S., Song, J.-Y., & Shahid, S. (2017). Effective Design and Planning Specification of Low Impact Development Practices Using Water Management Analysis Module (WMAM): Case of Malaysia. Water, 9(3), 173. https://doi.org/10.3390/w9030173

Anderman, L. H., Andrzejewski, C. E., & Allen, J. (2011). How Do Teachers Support Students’ Motivation and Learning in Their Classrooms? Teachers College Record, 113(5), 969–1003.

Armiati, A., & Yanrizawati, Y. (2020). Analisis Pemanfaatan Media Daring dalam Pembelajaran Matematika Ditinjau dari Kemandirian Belajar Siswa di Kelas XI SMAN 1 Koto Balingka. JURNAL EKSAKTA PENDIDIKAN (JEP), 4(2), 197–202. https://doi.org/10.24036/jep/vol4-iss2/507

Bastable, S. B. (2003). Principles of Teaching and Learning for Nursing Practice (2nd Ed.). JONES AND BARTLETT PUBLISHERS. http://eprints.qums.ac.ir/1682/1/Principles%20of%20Teaching%20and%20Learning%20for%20Nursing%20Practice.PDF

Depdiknas. (2011). Panduan Pelaksanaan Pendidikan Karakter. Dirjend Dikdasmen.

Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. (2013). Behaviorism, Cognitivism, Constructivism. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 26(2), 43–71.

Fatihah, M. al. (2016). Hubungan Antara Kemandirian Belajar dengan Prestasi Belajar PAI Siswa Kelas III SDN Panularan Surakarta. At-Tarbawi: Jurnal Kajian Kependidikan Islam, 1(2), 197–108. https://doi.org/10.22515/attarbawi.v1i2.200

Hadi, S., & Farida, F. S. (2012). PENGARUH MINAT, KEMANDIRIAN, DAN SUMBER BELAJAR TERHADAP PRESTASI BELAJAR SISWA PADA MATA PELAJARAN IPS KELAS VII SMP NEGERI 5 UNGARAN. Dinamika Pendidikan, 7(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.15294/dp.v7i1.4913

Haythornthwaite, C., & Andrews, R. (2011). E-Learning Theory and Practice. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446288566

Hoffman, B., & Ritchie, D. (1998). Teaching and Learning Online: Tools, Templates, and Training. California State University.

Kim, C., & Pekrun, R. (2014). Emotions and motivation in learning and performance. In Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology (pp. 65–75). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_6

Kristina, M., Sari, R. N., & Nagara, E. S. (2020). MODEL PELAKSANAAN PEMBELAJARAN DARING PADA MASA PANDEMI COVID 19 DI PROVINSI LAMPUNG. Idaarah: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 4(2). https://journal.uin-alauddin.ac.id/index.php/idaarah/article/view/16945

Kuntarto, E. (2017). Keefektifan Model Pembelajaran Daring dalam Perkuliahan Bahasa Indonesia di Perguruan Tinggi (The Effectiveness of Online Learning Models in Indonesian Language Lectures in Higher Education). Indonesian Language Education and Literature, 3(1), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.24235/ileal.v3i1.1820

Kurt, S. (2015, November 23). Dick and Carey Instructional Model. Educational Technology. https://educationaltechnology.net/dick-and-carey-instructional-model/

Latif, N. S. (2021). Upaya Meningkatkan Aktivitas Belajar Matematika Peserta Didik Kelas VII pada PJJ Melalui Leksimo. Jurnal Didaktika Pendidikan Dasar, 5(3), 843–866. https://doi.org/10.26811/didaktika.v5i3.339

Latif, S., As, U. S., Supriatna, M., & Ilfiandra, I. (2022). Developing A Cultural Intelligence Instrument for Guidance and Counseling Teachers. Journal of Educational Science and Technology (EST), 8(1), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.26858/est.v8i1.19653

Lim, C. P., Lee, S. L., & Richards, C. (2006). Developing Interactive Learning Objects for a Computing Mathematics Module. International Journal on E-Learning, 5(2), 221–244.

Livingston, K. (2012). Independent Learning. In N. M. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning (pp. 1526–1529). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_895

Maknun, J. (2015). The Implementation of Generative Learning Model on Physics Lesson to Increase Mastery Concepts and Generic Science Skills of Vocational Students. American Journal of Educational Research, 3(6), 742–748. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-3-6-12

Musriadi, Rubiah, & Jailani. (2016). THE DEVELOPMENT OF FUNGI CONCEPT MODUL USING BASED PROBLEM LEARNING AS A GUIDE FOR TEACHERS AND STUDENTS. Semantic Scholar.

Nalarita, Y., & Listiawan, T. (2018). Pengembangan E-Modul Kontekstual Interaktif Berbasis Web pada Mata Pelajaran Kimia Senyawa Hidrokarbon. MULTITEK INDONESIA, 12(2), 85–94.

Nengrum, T. A., Pettasolong, N., & Nuriman, M. (2021). Kelebihan dan Kekurangan Pembelajaran Luring dan Daring dalam Pencapaian Kompetensi Dasar Kurikulum Bahasa Arab di Madrasah Ibtidaiyah 2 Kabupaten Gorontalo. JURNAL PENDIDIKAN, 30(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.32585/jp.v30i1.1190

Oliver, M. (2000). Evaluating online teaching and learning. Information Services and Use, 20(2,3), 83–94.

Standar Proses Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah, Pub. L. No. 22 (2016). http://repositori.kemdikbud.go.id/4790/

Layanan Informasi Publik di Lingkungan Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan [JDIH BPK RI], Pub. L. No. 16 (2017). https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/163828/permendikbud-no-16-tahun-2017

Pramana, M. W. A., Jampel, I. N., & Pudjawan, K. (2020). Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Biologi Melalui E-Modul Berbasis Problem Based Learning. Jurnal Edutech Undiksha, 8(2), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.23887/jeu.v8i2.28921

Prastowo, A. (2013). Panduan kreatif membuat bahan ajar inovatif: Menciptakan metode pembelajaran yang menarik dan menyenangkan. Diva Press.

Ramadhana, A., Malik, A., & Denya, R. (2020). Studi Literatur Pada Model Pembelajaran ICARE Terhadap Keterampilam Berpikir Kreatif Peserta Didik Pada Materi Momentum&Impuls. COMPTON: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 7(1), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.30738/cjipf.v7i1.6390

Stoffova, V. (2016). The Importance of Didactic Computer Games in the Acquisition of New Knowledge. 676–688. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2016.11.70

Sugihartini, N., & Jayanta, N. L. (2017). PENGEMBANGAN E-MODUL MATA KULIAH STRATEGI PEMBELAJARAN. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Dan Kejuruan, 14(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.23887/jptk-undiksha.v14i2.11830

Syahrial, Asrial, Kurniawan, D. A., & Piyana, S. O. (2019). E-Modul Etnokontruktivisme: Implementasi Pada Kelas V Sekolah Dasar Ditinjau Dari Persepsi, Minat Dan Motivasi. JTP - Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 21(2), 165–177. https://doi.org/10.21009/jtp.v21i2.11030

Tsai, M.-J. (2009). The Model of Strategic e-Learning: Understanding and Evaluating Student e-Learning from Metacognitive Perspectives. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 12(1), 34–48.

Voithofer, R. (2005). Designing New Media Education Research: The Materiality of Data, Representation, and Dissemination. SAGE Publishing Company. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242479139_Designing_New_Media_Education_Research_The_Materiality_of_Data_Representation_and_Dissemination

Wiley, D. A., & Agency for Instructional Technology (Eds.). (2002). The instructional use of learning objects (1st ed). Agency for Instructional Technology : Association for Educational Communications & Technology.

Winne, P. H., & Jamieson-Noel, D. (2002). Exploring students’ calibration of self reports about study tactics and achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27(4), 551–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-476X(02)00006-1

Downloads

Published

2022-08-31

How to Cite

Latif, N. S., Upu, H., & Talib, A. (2022). E-module Development Model I Came to Facilitate Student Independence in Learning Mathematics. Asian Journal of Applied Sciences, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.24203/ajas.v10i4.7037