Supply Chain Risk Mapping and Analysis: A FMEA Implementation on Biofuel Downstream Supply Chain

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24203/ajas.v6i6.5648

Keywords:

supply chain, risk mapping and analysis, biofuel, failure mode and effect analysis

Abstract

The domestic biofuel program of Indonesia has been facing number of dynamics and challenges, such as: low production, uncertainty of feedstock availability, low realized consumption, price fluctuation and less competitive, unfit and viewer infrastructure, imbalance distribution. This study aims to map and analyze supply chain risks of biodiesel downstream business and offers a practical implementation of Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) in the supply chain risk analysis. It employs a qualitative approach. A semi-structured surveys and interviews applied in data collection. The research level of analysis is at corporate level. The study result shows that there are three highest risks arise related to regulation related risk, product arrival (delays) risk and transportation facilities risk with the Risk Priority Number (RPN) of 72 to 48 and the Risk Score Value (RSV) of 24 to 16. The result also shows that there is correlation between stakeholder types, locations and levels of information with their perception of biodiesel supply chain risk and risk priorities. The result may become a valuable input for developing such risk mitigation strategy to improve and enhance the effectivity and the sustainability of supply chain in both the company and the biodiesel industry.

References

• Anggara RA. 2009. The development of risk mitigation framework in supply chain risk management. Case Study: biofuel company in Indonesia [thesis]. Manchester (UK): University of Manchester.

• Aprobi. 2016. Industri biodiesel Indonesia.

• Aven T. 2015. Risk analysis. Second Edition. Norway: University of Stavanger.

• Bowman J. 2015. Strategies for mitigating supply chain disruptions [disertation]. Minneapolis (US): Walden University.

• BPDP Kelapa Sawit. 2016. Biodiesel Indonesia.

• [EBTK] Direktorat Jenderal Energi Baru Terbarukan dan Konversi Energi, Kementerian ESDM. 2015. Buku Statistik EBTKE 2015.

• Ghadge A, Dani S, Kalawsky R. 2012. Supply chain risk management: present and future scope. International Journal of Logistics Management. 23(3):313-339.

• Jüttner U. 2005. Supply chain risk management: understanding the business requirements from a practitioner perspective. International Journal of Logistics Management. 16(1):120-141.

• Jüttner U, Peck H, Christopher M. 2003. Supply chain risk management: outlining an agenda for future research. International Journal of Logistics: Research & Applications. 6(4):197-210.

• Mack O, Khare A, Kramer A, Burgartz T. 2016. Managing in a VUCA world. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

• Manuj I, Mentzer JT. 2008. Global supply chain risk management strategies. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management. 38(3):192-223.

• Nadram SS, Bindlish PK. 2017. Managing VUCA through integrative self-management. Sitzerland: Springer International Publishing AG.

• Packowski J. 2014. LEAN supply chain planning-the new supply chain management paradigm for process industries to master today’s VUCA world. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group LLC.

• Peng M, Peng Y, Chen H. 2014. Post-seismic supply chain risk management: a system dynamics disruption analysis approach for inventory and logistics planning. Computers & Operations Research. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cor. 2013.03.003.

Downloads

Published

2018-12-20

How to Cite

Wachyudi, T., Mahfud, A. D., & Arkeman, Y. (2018). Supply Chain Risk Mapping and Analysis: A FMEA Implementation on Biofuel Downstream Supply Chain. Asian Journal of Applied Sciences, 6(6). https://doi.org/10.24203/ajas.v6i6.5648

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 6 (2018): December 2018

Section

Articles

License

  • Papers must be submitted on the understanding that they have not been published elsewhere (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, or thesis) and are not currently under consideration by another journal published by any other publisher.
  • It is also the authors responsibility to ensure that the articles emanating from a particular source are submitted with the necessary approval.
  • The authors warrant that the paper is original and that he/she is the author of the paper, except for material that is clearly identified as to its original source, with permission notices from the copyright owners where required.
  • The authors ensure that all the references carefully and they are accurate in the text as well as in the list of references (and vice versa).
  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  • The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.