Empirical Study on Online Health Information Seeking and Health App Usage
Keywords:
Mobile health, smartphone, telemedicine, health apps, online health behaviorsAbstract
Objective: This study aimed to examine Thai smartphone users in term of their online health information seeking and health apps usage behaviors.
Methods: The researchers conducted a cross-sectional survey of 203 smartphone users throughout Thailand. The 37-item survey assessed socio-demographics characteristics, multiple dimensions of people’s health-information levels, experiences in finding health information online, reasons why people are using or not using the health apps, and perception towards paying for health information online.Â
Result: Most smartphone users had used internet to search for health information (193/203, 95.1%), but less than half (82/203, 40.4%) of those users had used health-related mobile applications. The most cited reasons why Thai people did not use health apps were not trusting the medical information, thinking that the apps were not useful, and worrying that their health information was insecure. Among the people who had used health app, the most common category was fitness/exercise apps, and diet calorie calculation apps. The cost of the apps was an important factor. Only 16.57% of users were willing to pay to use health services, while 23% mentioned that they would not use the app at all.
Conclusion: While there are many health-apps available, most of Thai people still did not use health apps. The researchers believe that there are opportunities in the healthcare app services, particularly in the domain of medical knowledge providers. Developers who are interested in creating health apps should focus in medical information accuracy in order to earn users trust in the applications.References
Thailand’s Telecom Market end of 2015 [internet]. Yozzo ICT Consulting Firm; c2016 [cited 2017 Mar 12]. Available from: https://www.slideshare.net/yozzo1/thailands-telecom-market-end-of-2015
Kakihara M. Mobile Apps in APAC: 2016 Report [Internet]. Google; c2016 [cited at 2017 Mar 13]. Available from: http://apac.thinkwithgoogle.com/articles/mobile-apps-in-apac-2016-report.html
Sherry JM, Ratzan SC. Measurement and evaluation outcomes for mHealth communication: don't we have an app for that?.
IMS Institute. Patient Adoption of mHealth [Internet]. c2015 [cited at 2017 Mar 15]. Available from: http://www.imshealth.com/en/thought-leadership/quintilesims-institute/reports/patient-adoption-of-mhealth
Aitken M, Gauntlett C. Patient apps for improved healthcare: from novelty to mainstream. Parsippany, NJ: IMS Institute for Healthcare Informatics. 2013 Oct.
Stoyanov SR, Hides L, Kavanagh DJ, Zelenko O, Tjondronegoro D, Mani M. Mobile app rating scale: a new tool for assessing the quality of health mobile apps. JMIR mHealth and uHealth. 2015;3(1):e27.
Hanrahan C, Aungst TD, Cole S. Evaluating Mobile Medical Applications. 2014.
Klonoff DC. The current status of mHealth for diabetes: will it be the next big thing?. Journal of diabetes science and technology. 2013 May 1;7(3):749-58.
Leijdekkers P, Gay V. User adoption of mobile apps for chronic disease management: a case study based on myfitnesscompanion®. InInternational Conference on Smart Homes and Health Telematics 2012 Jun 12 (pp. 42-49). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Ruiz IJ, Nagappan M, Adams B, Berger T, Dienst S, Hassan AE. Examining the Rating System Used in Mobile-App Stores. IEEE Software. 2016 Nov;33(6):86-92.
Zhu H, Xiong H, Ge Y, Chen E. Ranking fraud detection for mobile apps: A holistic view. InProceedings of the 22nd ACM international conference on Information & Knowledge Management 2013 Oct 27 (pp. 619-628). ACM.
Kaplowitz MD, Hadlock TD, Levine R. A comparison of web and mail survey response rates. Public opinion quarterly. 2004 Mar 1;68(1):94-101.
Gosling SD, Vazire S, Srivastava S, John OP. Should we trust web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about internet questionnaires. American Psychologist. 2004 Feb;59(2):93.
Dutta-Bergman MJ. Primary sources of health information: Comparisons in the domain of health attitudes, health cognitions, and health behaviors. Health communication. 2004 Jul 1;16(3):273-88.
Cameron D, Harvey A. eHEALS: The eHealth Literacy Scale. J Med Internet Res. 2006;8(4):e27.
Compeau DR, Higgins CA. Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS quarterly. 1995 Jun 1:189-211.
Rusli EM, MacMillan D. Uber gets an uber-valuation [Internet]. Wall Street Journal; c2014 [cited 2017 Mar 31]. Available from: wsj.com/articles/uber-gets-uber-valuation-of-18-2-billion-1402073876
Levine B, Goldschlag D. Can telemedicine boost our ailing healthcare system? [Internet]. Modern Medicine Network; c2015 [cited at 2017 Mar 31]. Available from: http://contemporaryobgyn.modernmedicine.com/contemporary-obgyn/news/can-telemedicine-boost-our-ailing-healthcare-system-1
Fox S, Duggan M. Mobile Health 2012 [Internet]. c2012 [cited at 2017 Mar 21]. Available from: http://www.pewinternet.org/2012/11/08/mobile-health-2012/
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
- Papers must be submitted on the understanding that they have not been published elsewhere (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, or thesis) and are not currently under consideration by another journal published by any other publisher.
- It is also the authors responsibility to ensure that the articles emanating from a particular source are submitted with the necessary approval.
- The authors warrant that the paper is original and that he/she is the author of the paper, except for material that is clearly identified as to its original source, with permission notices from the copyright owners where required.
- The authors ensure that all the references carefully and they are accurate in the text as well as in the list of references (and vice versa).
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
- The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.
