Designing a Functioning Community Forest Association: A Case of Muileshi, Kakamega County, Kenya
Keywords:
designing, community forest association, Muileshi, Kakamega, KenyaAbstract
Participatory Forest Management was introduced into law with the passing of the Kenya Forest Act of 2005, which provides a legal basis for communities in Kenya, to participate in forest management. In Kenya Participatory forest management entails the involvement of the forest adjacent community members through formation of Community Forest Associations, which participates in the management of the forest with the Kenya Forest Service (KFS) and other stakeholders. This paper examines the design and functioning of Muileshi community forest Association in Kakamega Kenya to answer a key question in current participatory forest management literature on how one can design a functioning community forest association that can conserve the forest resources as well as provide sustainable livelihoods to the poor forest dependent communities. The study utilized documents and a focus group discussion with Muileshi community forest association to answer this question. All the data collected was qualitatively analyzed by putting the key themes together from both the documents and focus group discussion and using them to answer the study objective. It is conclude in the study that a well designed community forest association can contribute significantly to the conservation a community based forest as well as deliver livelihoods to the communities adjacent to the forests that depend on them for their livelihoods. It is recommended that there is need to strengthen the community forest association arrangements to enable them operate efficiently. This paper intends to answer a key question in current literature on how one can design a function CFA that can conserve forests and deliver sustainable livelihoods to communities depended on those forests?
Â
References
Adams, W. M., & Hutton, J. People, parks and poverty: political ecology and biodiversity conservation. Conservation and society, 5(2), 147, 2007,
Baumann, P. Sustainable livelihoods and political capital: Arguments and evidence from decentralization and natural resource management in India. (Working Paper No.136). London: Overseas Development Institute, 2000
Bhattarai, T. N. Community forestry development in Nepal. National Curriculum Development Workshop Paper. Kathmandu, Nepal: Ministry of Forests and Soil conservation, 1987
Brown, P. C., Lassoie, J. P., & Wolf, S. A. An analytic approach to structuring co-management of community forests in Cameroon. Progress in Development Studies, 7(2), 135-154, 2007.
Bryman, A. Social research methods (3 ed.). New York: Oxford University press, 2008. community-based natural resources management, Ecology and Society 15(4), 38, 2010.
Cox, M., Arnold, G., & Villamayor Tomás , S. A. A review of the design principles for community-based natural resources management Ecology and Society 15(4), 38, 2010
Department of Resource Surveys and Remote Sensing, & Kenya Forests Working Group (DSRS & KFWG). Changes in forest cover in Kenya’s five water towers, 2003-2005, 2006. Retrieved 17/6/2016 from http://www.undp.org/biodiversity/biodiversitycd/economic%20incentives.pdf
Geller, S., McConnell, R., & Wanyiri, J. (2007). Linking natural forest programs and poverty reduction strategies in Kenya. Nairobi: Kenya Forest Services, 2007.
Kenya Forest Service (KFS). Kakamega Forest Strategic Ecosystem management Plan 2015-2040, Kenya Forest Service, Kiambu Road, Nairobi, Kenya, 2015.
. Klooster, D. and O. Masera. Community forest management in Mexico: Carbon mitigation and biodiversity conservation through rural development. Global Environmental Change 10:259–272, 2000
. Koech, C.K., Ongugo, P.O. Mbuvi, M.T.E. and Maua, J.O. Community Forest Associations in Kenya: challenges and opportunities. Kenya Forestry Research Institute, Nairobi Kenya, 2009.
. Larson, A. M. Democratic decentralization in the forestry Sector: Lessons learned from Africa, Asia and Latin America. In: The politics of decentralization: Forests, power and people (eds. Colfer, C.J.P. and D. Capistrano). Pp. 32-62. London: Earthscan, 2005
Little, B. J. Forest communities become partners in management. Am. For. 102(3):17, 1996.
Ludeki, J.V., G. M. Wamukoya, and D. Walubengo. Environmental Management in Kenya: A Framework for Sustainable Forest Management in Kenya, Understanding the Draft Forest Policy and Forests Act 2005, 2006.
Mbuvi, M. T., Musyoki, J. K., & Ongugo, P. O. Equity Mechanisms in Traditional Forest Management Systems: A Case Study of Loita Forest in Kenya. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 34(4), 380-405, 2015.
McCay, B. J., & Acheson, J. M. The question of the commons: The culture and ecology of communal resources. Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 1987.
Ming’ate, F.L.M, Rennie H.G., Memon A. Potential for co-management approaches to strengthen livelihoods of forest dependent communities: a Kenyan Case. Land Use Policy. 41:304–312, 2014a.
Ming’ate, M.L.F., Rennie, H, G., and Memon, A. NGOs come and go but business continues: Lessons from co- management institutional arrangements for governance of the Arabuko-Sokoke forest in Kenya. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology (21)6,526-531 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2014.968237, 2014b.
Ming'ate, F. L. M., & Bollig, M. Local Rules and Their Enforcement in the Arabuko-Sokoke Forest Reserve Co- Management Arrangement in Kenya. Journal of East African Natural History, 105(1), 1-19, 2016.
Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources (MENR). Participation in sustainable forest management. 2007 draft rules and guidelines. Nairobi, Kenya, 2007.
Mogoi J, Obonyo E, Ongugo P, Oeba V, Mwangi E. Communities, property rights and forest decentralization in Kenya: Early lessons from participatory forestry management. Conservation and Society, 10:182-94, 2012.
Ostrom, E. Governing the commons. The evolution of institutions for collective action (1st ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
Pagdee, A., Kim, Y. S., & Daugherty, P. J. What makes community forest management successful: a meta- study from community forests throughout the world. Society and Natural Resources, 19(1), 33-52, 2006.
Plummer, R., & Fitzgibbon, J. Co-management of natural resources: a proposed framework.Environmental management, 33(6), 876-885, 2004.
Ribot, J.C. Choosing representation: Institutions and powers for decentralized natural resource management. In: The politics of decentralization (eds. Colfer, C.P. and D. Capistrano). London: Earthscan, 2005.
Springate-Baginski, O., Dev, O.P., Yadav, N.,and Soussan, J. Community Forest Management in the Middle Hills of Nepal: the Changing Context. Forest & Livelihoods vol.3 (1) p5-20 ,2003
Steins, N. A. All hands on deck: An interactive perspective on complex common-pool resource management based on case studies in the coastal waters of the Isle of Wight (UK), Connemara (Ireland) and the Dutch Wadden Sea. Published doctoral thesis, Wageningen University, The Nertherlands, 1999
Thenya, T. B. Wandago, and E. T. Nahama. Participatory forest management experience in Kenya (1996–2006), in Proceedings of the 1st National Participatory Forest Management Conference, KEFRI Headquarters, Nairobi, Kenya, 2003.
Thoms, C.A., Karmacharya, M.B., and Karna, B.K. Exclusion Isn't Easy: Lessons from a Leasehold Forest. Forest & Livelihoods vol.2 (2) p48-54, 2003.
Wily, L.A. Participatory Forest Management in Africa. An Overview of Progress and Issues. Community Based Natural Forest Management Network (CBNM), 2002
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
- Papers must be submitted on the understanding that they have not been published elsewhere (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, or thesis) and are not currently under consideration by another journal published by any other publisher.
- It is also the authors responsibility to ensure that the articles emanating from a particular source are submitted with the necessary approval.
- The authors warrant that the paper is original and that he/she is the author of the paper, except for material that is clearly identified as to its original source, with permission notices from the copyright owners where required.
- The authors ensure that all the references carefully and they are accurate in the text as well as in the list of references (and vice versa).
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
- The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.