Response of Amaranthus Cruentus to Some Amendments on a Sandy-Loam Alfisol Contaminated by Heavy Metals
Keywords:
Contamination, Heavy metals, Amaranth, Industrial waste, Metal uptake, FertilizersAbstract
Indiscriminate dumping of industrial wastes often leads to heavy metal accumulation in soils but organic matter amendments may ameliorate the resulting toxicity in crop production. This study evaluated the effectiveness of eight fertilizer treatments (Control; Urea, U; Organic Fertilizer, OF; Single Superphosphate, SSP; SSP+U; OF+U and OF+SSP; OF +SSP+U) in reducing heavy metal uptake by Amaranthus cruentus (L) on contaminated alfisols .Treatments were replicated three times in completely randomized design. Sole and combined treatments (organic and/or inorganic) significantly (p<0.05) enhanced crop performance while heavy metal tissue concentration and uptake by plants were low compared to Control. Plants treated with OF+U gave the least concentration of tissue Pb (647.00 mg/kg), Zn (198.50 mg/kg) and Cu (16.50 mg/kg) while control plants had the highest corresponding values of 2562.50 mg/kg, 695.00 mg/kg and 66.00 mg/kg. Mineral fertilizer-fortified organic manures have great potential in the production of amaranth plants devoid of heavy metal poisoning.
Â
References
Cao XD, Ma QY, Chen M, Singh SP, Harris WG. 2002. Impacts of phosphate amendments on lead biogeochemistry at a contaminated site. Environ Science Technology, 24: 5296–5304.
Cao XD, Ma QY, Rhue DR and Appel CS. 2004. Mechanisms of lead, copper and zinc retention by phosphate rock. Environ Pollution, 131: 435–444.
Clemente R., Escolar, A and Bernal M.P. 2006. Heavy metal fractionating and organic matter mineralization in contaminated calcareous soil amended with organic materials. Bioresourse Technology 97:1894-1901.
FAO/WHO 1978. List of maximum levels recommended for contaminants by joint FAO/WHO codex. Alimentaries Commission 3rd Series Rome, FAO/WHO.CAL/FAL 4-1978.
FEPA 1991. National interim guidelines and standards for industrial effluents, gaseous emission and hazardous wastes management in Nigeria, pp 28-30.
Kachenko, A.C. and B. Singh 2006. Heavy metal contamination in vegetables grown in urban and metal smelter contaminated sites in Australia. Water Air Soil Pollution. 169, 101 – 123.
Long X. X., Yang X. E., Ni. W. Z., Ye Z. Q., He, Z. L., Calvert D. V., Stoffella, J. P. 2003. Assessing zinc thresholds for phytotoxicity and potential dietary toxicity in selected vegetable crops. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal. 34 (9 & 10):1421–1434.
M. Mench, J. Vangronsveld, C. Beckx, and A. Ruttens, 2006. Progress in assisted natural remediation of an arsenic contaminated agricultural soil, Environmental Pollution, vol. 144, no. 1, pp. 51–61.
Nicklow, C. W., P. H. Comas-Haezebrouck and W. A. Feder, 1983. Influence of varying soil Lead levels on Lead uptake of leafy and root vegetables. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 108: 193-195.
Singh, C.M., P.K. Sharma, P. Kishor, P.K. Mishra, A.P. Singh, R. Verma and P. Raha, 2011. Impact of integrated nutrient management on growth, yield and nutrient uptake by wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Asian J. Agric. Res., 5: 76-82.
Singh, Anita, Agrawal, Madhoolika and Marshall, Fiona M., 2010. The role of organic vs. inorganic fertilizers in reducing phytoavailability of heavy metals in a wastewater-irrigated area. Ecological Engineering, 36 (12). pp. 1733-1740.
Singh, S. and M. Kumar, 2006. Heavy metal load of soil, water and vegetables in peri-urban Delhi Environ. Monitor. Assess., 120: 79-91.
XieZheng-miao, Wang Bi-ling, Sun Ye-fang, Li Jing, 2006. Field demonstration of reduction of lead availability in soil and cabbage (Brassica Chinensis L.) contaminated by mining tailings using phosphorus fertilizers .Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B Vol. 7 No. 1 p. 43-50.
Yang X. E., Long X. X., Ni W. Z, Ye Z. Q., He ZL, Stoffella P. J, Calvert D V. 2002. Assessing copper thresholds for phytotoxicity and potential dietary toxicity in selected vegetables crops. J Environ Sci Health.; B37 (6):625–635.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
- Papers must be submitted on the understanding that they have not been published elsewhere (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, or thesis) and are not currently under consideration by another journal published by any other publisher.
- It is also the authors responsibility to ensure that the articles emanating from a particular source are submitted with the necessary approval.
- The authors warrant that the paper is original and that he/she is the author of the paper, except for material that is clearly identified as to its original source, with permission notices from the copyright owners where required.
- The authors ensure that all the references carefully and they are accurate in the text as well as in the list of references (and vice versa).
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
- The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.
