Econometrics Analysis on the Choice Preference of Farmers on Water Harvesting Technologies: A Case Study in East Gojjam Zone, Ethiopia


  • Derjew Fentie Debremarkos Unversity
  • Dagne Minalu


Water harvesting technologies, choice preference, multinomial logit model, East Gojjam zone (Ethiopia)


This study is conducted to look into the socio-economic, physical and other related factors, which can affect preferences among water storage technology groups in east Gojjam zone; Ethiopia.. To address these objectives, both quantitative and qualitative data were collected. The primary date were collected from 200 sample households who are selected three districts of East Gojjam zone of Amhara National Regional State, Ethiopia proportionately and randomly . Multinomial logit-model was used to analyze the determinants of choice of water harvesting technologies. In addition descriptive statistics were also used as deemed necessary. A total of 10 explanatory variables were included in the analysis of multinomial logit model. The result of the analysis indicated that among the 10 hypothesized explanatory variables included in the model level of education has a positive and significant effect on the choice of underground group of structures while access to credit, plot distance from home, level of plot fertility and soil type has also negatively and significantly affects the choice of underground group of structures. In the case of the aboveground group of structures, access to credit and soil type of the plot significantly and positively affect the choice decision. Whereas; the choice of  the surface group of structures, positively and significantly affected by  area of the plot (AREIM) , distance of the plot from home (DISTPLOT) and slope level of the plot (SLOP). The implication is that farmers are interested to use surface water harvesting structures on sloppy, distant and large plots. Thus, the importance recommendations which are found to be of paramount importance from the finding of this study include; any effort in promotion of water harvesting activity should recognize the socio-economic, household and technological characteristics; Promotion of water harvesting should be done in conjunction with crops, which can be sold for cash. This can be also supported by improving marketing channels for produced crops. Physical characteristics of the plot are important factors for the preference decision behavior of farm households among alternative water harvesting technology groups. Therefore, considering physical characteristics of the particular area in promoting water harvesting structure groups is paramount important.


. CTA, 2000. Managing dry land resources. A manual for Eastern and Southern Africa. 53p.

. Dasgupta, S., 1989. Diffusion of Agricultural Innovations in Village India. Department of Sociology and Anthropology,

University of Prince Edward Island. Canada. 74-86p.

. East Gojjam Zone Department of Agriculture (ZDOA). 2012. Annual plan document for the year 2012/13(in Amharic) (unpublished). East Gojjam Zone Department of Agriculture,Debremarkos, Ethiopia.

. FAO, 1994. Water harvesting for improved crop production. Proceedings of the FAO consultation. Cairo, Egypt. 31-40p.

. Green, H.W., 2000. Econometric Analysis. Fourth Edition. New York University. MacMillan Publishing Company. 857- 871p.

. Habtamu, 1999. Rainwater harvesting concepts and issues, proceedings of the annual meeting on soil and water conservation, Addis Ababa, Ethipia. (2). 24p.

. Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR 2009). Research Papers Water Harvesting.3p

. Liniger, H., Mekdaschi Studer, R., Hauert, C. and M. Gurtner. 2011. Sustainable Land Management in Practice: Guidelines and Best Practices for Sub-Saharan Africa. Terrafrica, World Overview of Conservation Approaches and Technologies (WOCAT) and Food and Agriculture Organization Of The United Nations (FAO).

. Martinson, D. Ranatunga and A. Gunarante, 2001. Reducing rainwater harvesting systemcost, Sustainable environmental sanitation and water services, 28th WEDC conference.Calcutta, India. 43p.

. Mekdaschi Studer, R. and Liniger, H. 2013. Water Harvesting: Guidelines to Good Practice. Centre fo Development and Environment (CDE), Bern; Rainwater Harvesting Implementation Network (RAIN), Amsterdam; MetaMeta, Wageningen; The International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD), Rome.

. Molla,T. 2005. Farmers’ Response and Willingness to Participate In Water Harvesting Practices: A Case Study in Dejen District / East Gojam Zone.

. NBE (National Bank of Ethiopia), 2006. National bank of Ethiopia 2005/2006 annual report.Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

. Ngigi, N., Stephen, 2003. Rainwater Harvesting for Improved Food Security. Nairobi, Kenya. 89-94, 233-244p.

. Rees, D., 2000. Partially Below Ground (PBG) tank for rain water storage. Instructions for Manufacture. Development Technology Unit, School of Engineering, University of Warwick.TR-RWH01. 5-7p.

. Reij, C., P. Mulder and L. Begemann, 1993. Water Harvesting for Plant Production. A Comprehensive Review of the Literature. Third Printing. The World Bank.Washington, D.C. 1(91). 3-13p.

. Rogers, M. and F. Shomaker, 1971. Diffusion of Innovations. Second editition. Free Press of Glencoe. NewYork. 185-187p.

. Strock, H.; Berhanu Adnew, Bezabih Emana, A.Borowiecki and Shimelis W/Hawariat,1991. Farming systems and farm management practices of smallholders in the Hararghe highlands. Farming systems and resource economics in the Tropics.Vol.II, Germany: Wissenschaftsverlag Vauk Kiel.




How to Cite

Fentie, D., & Minalu, D. (2015). Econometrics Analysis on the Choice Preference of Farmers on Water Harvesting Technologies: A Case Study in East Gojjam Zone, Ethiopia. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences, 3(5). Retrieved from