Enzyme Course: Contents, Coverage and Students’ Feedback on Course and Teacher

Authors

  • Kwabena Nsiah Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana

Keywords:

Enzymes, course, evaluation, syllabus, quality assurance

Abstract

This study focuses on the first semester course on Enzymes, as taught in the Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology of the Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana. The course outline and detailed course content have been provided, likewise the instructor’s mode of delivery of lectures. The study provides an avenue for students’ evaluation of one of the core courses taught  in the first semester, Enzymes I. The evaluation was done by two different final year groups of two programmes, Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology (34 students) and Department of Food Science and Technology (17 students). The respondents evaluated the course content (scope and relevance), instructor’s mode of delivery and ranking of instructor. Both groups of students found the course content to be adequate and relevant, and identified some topics as interesting or otherwise. The overall performance of the instructor was rated very high. The study has brought out the views of students on a course and its mode of delivery, which would assist in the future revision of syllabus, as part of the continuous quality assurance programme.

 

References

K. Nsiah, K., Dzogbefia, V. P. Ansong, D. Boateng, H. Ocloo, D. Osei Akoto A. “The pattern of AST and ALT changes in relation to haemolysis in sickle cell diseaseâ€, Clinical Medicine Insights; Blood Disorders, vol 4, pp 1-9, 2011

K. Nsiah, V. P. Dzogbefia, D. Ansong, H. Boateng, D. Ocloo, E. Osei-Frempong, N. Kena Frempong, A. Osei Akoto. “The incidence of malaria and the comparison of hematological and biochemical indices of Plasmodium falciparum-parasitemic and aparasitemic sickle cell disease. (SCD) patients.†Int J Lab Hematol, vol 32, pp e197-e207, 2010

K. Nsiah, E.O. Terlabi, E. Woode, D.D. Obiri, C. Ansah, M. Duwiejua. “Toxicological assessment of Parquetina nigrescens extracts in rats.†J Sci Tech. vol 26, pp 24-31, 2006

D. Dawley,D. Havelka “A curriculum development process model.†J. Coll. Teach. Learn.vol 1, pp 51–55, 2004.

H. M. Anderson,J. Cain,E. Bird “Online student course evaluations: Review of literature and a pilot study.†Am. J. Pharmaceut. Educ. vol 69, pp 34–43, 2005

Lake, D. “Helping students to go SOLO: teaching critical numeracy in the biological sciences.†Journal of Biological Education. vol 33, 191-198, 1999.

Phoenix, D. A. “Numeracy and the life scientist!†Journal of Biological Education. vol 34, 3-4, 1999.

J. G. Voet D. Voet “Student centered teaching.†Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ. vol 33, 133 2010

M. Savin-Baden “Disciplinary differences or modes of curriculum practice: Who promised to deliver what in problem-based learning?†Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ. vol 31, 338–343, 2003.

T.R. Anderson, J.M. Rogan “Bridging the educational research-teaching practice gap: Curriculum development, Part 1: Components of the curriculum and influences on the process of curriculum design.†Biochem Molec Biol Educ. vol 39, 68-76, 2011

G. Gibbs, in R.Barnett, Ed. Improving the quality of learning through course design, Learning to Effect, SRHE & OUP: Buckingham, pp. 149–165, 1992.

H.B. White “Commentary: Lecturing with stone-age technology.†Biochem Molec Biol Educ. vol 36, p 65, 2008

E.J. Kampmeier,V. Minderhout, R. S. Moog, T. Platt, P. Varma-Nelson, H. B. White “Pedagogies of engagement in science A comparison of PBL, POGIL, and PLTL.†Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ.vol 36, 262–273, 2008

Downloads

Published

2013-10-14

How to Cite

Nsiah, K. (2013). Enzyme Course: Contents, Coverage and Students’ Feedback on Course and Teacher. Asian Journal of Education and E-Learning, 1(4). Retrieved from https://ajouronline.com/index.php/AJEEL/article/view/420

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 4 (2013): October 2013

Section

Articles

License

  • Papers must be submitted on the understanding that they have not been published elsewhere (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, or thesis) and are not currently under consideration by another journal published by any other publisher.
  • It is also the authors responsibility to ensure that the articles emanating from a particular source are submitted with the necessary approval.
  • The authors warrant that the paper is original and that he/she is the author of the paper, except for material that is clearly identified as to its original source, with permission notices from the copyright owners where required.
  • The authors ensure that all the references carefully and they are accurate in the text as well as in the list of references (and vice versa).
  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  • The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.