Development of Agropolitan Area Based on Local Economic Potential (A Case Study: Belajen Agropolitan Area, Enrekang District)

Haeruddin Saleh, Batara Surya, Chalid Imran Musa, H. Muhammad Azis

Abstract


This research was conducted at Belajen agropolitan area, Enrekang District by analyzing the development of the agropolitan that takes advantage of the local economic potential. This paper is directed to examine and analyze the production result of horticultural commodity potential as a base sector that can be developed in order to support Belajen agropolitan area. The research method chosen was a case study using a quantitative-qualitative approach. We chose the approaches due to; (i) the growing reality is not singular but plural, (ii) this paper is intended to describe the local economic potential associated with the development of Belajen agropolitan area and (iii) Belajen agropolitan area has not been fully developed through the support facilities and infrastructures, the institutional role of community and the creation of horticultural commodity products - based rural agribusiness.

The results of the study illustrate that the implementation of agropolitan area by bottom-up approach in this case is the process of formulating public policy that starts from the bottom, meaning that all existing problems in the lower classes (regions) then are discussed by the government to look for alternative solutions appropriate policies. Through this approach the policy issued by the government is effective because it corresponds to what is needed by the community, the provision of facilities and infrastructure for production, agribusiness activity and the development of human resources. Therefore, the agricultural productivity of the community at the agropolitan area experiencing growth and by quantitative analysis, the superior products as the basis for the development of agropolitan area can be determined. Then, the determination of the model is used to see how the working process of agropolitan area which is determined by the infrastructure, human resources, institutional, policy and natural resource potential.


Keywords


Agropolitan; Rural Agribusiness; Economic Impact; Local Economic; and Superior Products.

Full Text:

PDF

References


• Arsyad, L,. (2015). Ekonomi Pembangunan. Penerbit. UPP STIM YKPN.

• Argo, Teti. A,. (2007).Menguak Keberpihakan Pada Perdesaan Di Indonesia: Membangun Hubungan Desa Kota Bagi Pembangunan Perdesaan, Jurnal Infrastruktur dan Lingkungan Binaan, Volume. I Nomor. 1, Juni 2005 http://www.infrastrukturperdesaan.org).

• Bappeda Kabupaten Enrekang.(2008). Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Daerah (RPJMD) Kabupaten Enrekang 2008-2028.

• Bappeda Propinsi Sulawesi Selatan.(2009). Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan.

• --------BPS Kabupaten Enrekang. (2014). Kabupaten Enrekang Dalam Angka 2014.

• --------BPS Kabupaten Enrekang. (2014). Kecamatan Alla Dalam Angka 2014.

• Blakely, E.J,. (1991). The Meaning of Local Economic Development in Local Economic Development: Strategis for a changing Economy (Editor R. Scott Fosler) International City Management Association (ICMA) Washinton. D.C.

• Blakely, E.J,. (1994). Planning Local Economic Development: Theory and Practice Sage Publication USA.

• BPSDM Pertanian.(2014).Pedoman Operasional Pengembangan Kawasan Agropolitan, Departemen Pertanian RI.

• BurhanBungin.(2007).AnalisisDataPenelitian Kualitatif:Pemahaman Filosofis dan Metodologiske ArahPenguasaanModel Aplikasi.Jakarta.RajaGrafindoPersada.

• Bogdan danBiklen, 1982.Qualitative ResearchforEducation. United States ofAmerica: McGraw-Hill,Inc.

• Dahliana, L,. (2009). One Village Product. Jurnal Manajemen Perkebunan. Yogyakarta.

• Friedman J,. (1975). Agropolitan Development: Towards a New Strategy for Regional Planning in Asia. London

• Galdeano, Rodriguez and Lorente, (2004).Rural Multifunctionality in Europe: The Concept and Policies (90th EAAE Seminar “Multifuncional Agriculture, Policies and Market: Understanding The Critical Linkage”-October 27-29,2004 – Rennes).

• Hendayana, R. 2003 Aplikasi Metode Quotient (LQ) Dalam Penentuan Komoditas Unggulan Nasional. Jurnal Informatika Pertanian. Volume 12 Balai Pengkajian dan Pengembangan Teknologi Pertanian Bogor.

• Harun U.R,. (2004). Perencanaan Pengembangan Kawasan Agropolitan dalam Sistem Perkotaan Regional di Indonesia. Makalah Worshop Pengembangan Agropolitan Sebagai Strategi Pembangunan Pedesaan dan Wilayah Secara Berimbang. P4W-IPB dan P3PT. Bogor.

• Haryono, Suryono,. (2007). Gerakan Nasional Pemberdayaan Masyarakat (on-line) www.hupelita.com.

• Helmsing,.(2007).Partnership, Meso-Institution and Learning New Local and Regional Economic Development Initiatives in Latin America, Institute of Social Studies, The Hague,TheNetherlands, http://.worldbank.org/wbiep/decentralization/library15/Helmsing.pdf.

• Jhingan, M.L,. (2014). Ekonomi Pembangunan Dan Perencanaan. Penerbit. RajaGrafindo Persada.

• Kuncoro M,. (2014).Otonomi Daerah Menuju Era Baru Pembangunan Daerah Edisi 3. Penerbit. Erlangga.

• Kuncoro M,. (2014). Ekonomika Aglomerasi: Dinamika & Dimensi Spasial Kluster Industri Indonesia. Penerbit. UPP. STIM. YKPN.

• Martodireso. Suryanto,. (2002). Agribisnis Kemitraan Usaha Bersama. Penerbit Kanisius, Yogyakarta.

• Mercado, G. Ruben,.(2007).Regional Development in The Philippines: A Review of Experience, State of The Art and Agenda for Research and Action, Philippine Institute forDevelopmentStudies(PIDS), http://www3.pids.gov.ph/ris/pdf/pidsdps0203.

• Mardikanto, T,. dan Soebiato, P,. (2013). Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Dalam Perspektif Kebijakan Publik. Penerbit. Alfabeta, Bandung.

• Rivai,. (2003). Pengembangan Kawasan Agropolitan Sebagai Pendekatan Wilayah danPemberdayaanMasyarakat Pertanian,SekolahPascasarjana/S3, Institut Pertanian, Bogor.

• Sukirno, Sadono,. (2010). Ekonomi Pembangunan: Proses, Masalah dan Dasar Kebijakan. Penerbit. Prenada Media Group.

• Sarman, Muktar,. (2008). Program Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Berbasis LERD. PK2PD dan Program MSAP Unlam. Banjarbaru.

• Soenarno,. (2003).PengembanganKawasan AgropolitanDalamRangka PengembanganWilayah.

• Sugiyono,. (2013). Metode Penelitian (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Penerbit. Alfabeta. Bandung.

• Suryani, P,. dan Rahmadani, E,. (2014). Manajemen Agribisnis. Penerbit. ASWAJA PRESSINDO.

• Sjafrisal,. (2014). Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah Dalam Era Otonomi. Penerbit. PT. RAJAGRAFINDO PERSADA.

• Sutopo,. (2002).Metodologi PenelitianKualitatif: DasarTeoridanTerapannya dalam Penelitian.Surakarta: SebelasMaret University.

• Triyowono,. (2003). Emansipasi Nilai Lokal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Pasca Sentralisasi Pembangunan. Penerbit. Bayu Media.Malang.

• Tarigan, R,. (2014). Ekonomi Regional. Penerbit. PT. Bumi Aksara.

• Yusuf, M,. (2004).Strategi Pengembangan Komoditas di Kawasan Agropolitan di Kabupaten Indragiri Hilir. Sekolah Pascasarjana. Institut Pertanian Bogor.

• Yuwono, T,. et. all. (2011). Pembangunan Pertanian: Membangun Kedaulatan Pangan. Penerbit. Gadjah Mada University Press.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.